Alec Baldwin and gun safety

The cinematographer generally stands near the camera to see the scene at the same angle as the camera does. But regardless she and the director was obviously forward to Baldwin. Unless Baldwin shot backward. And with the dumbass Baldwin that is a possibility.

Thank you. So she was not directly in the path.

i am glad you are finally starting to comprehend and discuss. :thumbsup:
 
Thank you. So she was not directly in the path.

i am glad you are finally starting to comprehend and discuss. :thumbsup:
She was forward of Baldwin or down range. AGAIN on a gun range you are not even allowed to touch your gun while people are down range. She was directly in the path of the bullet was she not?
 
Last edited:
You have stats on that? NRA is not training people. They are a gun manufacturer's lobby. They used to be pro-registration and testing.

You have been shown many times the NRA trains both citizens and law enforcement.. It's not our fault you are blinded by stupidity.
 
Baldwin needs to shut his mouth and tell his lawyers to start handing out money.

This fucker clearly is not too bright.
 
alec-baldwin-the-reason-for-the-safety-briefing-jpg.851452
 
Can fragments scatter and bounce?
And go through one person and lodge in another? Not likely. But is that the position you want to take? Do you want to make a friendly wager it was not a ricochet or a fragment? If she was not forward of Baldwin how did the bullet totally reverse direction and strike her? Explain the physics of that for me.
 
And go through one person and lodge in another? Not likely. But is that the position you want to take? Do you want to make a friendly wager it was not a ricochet or a fragment? If she was not forward of Baldwin how did the bullet totally reverse direction and strike her? Explain the physics of that for me.

You are ignoring one important fact, probably on purpose, that it sounded like a whip.
 
Back
Top