Judge in Kyle Rittenhouse trial praises jury as 'wonderful' after it reached verdict

The kid will be a fox celebrity

Racist chicks will paw all over him


Trumpers and Russians will fill his pockets with money


His life will be miserable

No real love or respect will come to him


He has now been cursed


Hate rules his life forever



The real post someone pretended to quote
 
Evince dines on cat food

:nono:

Now, be fair. Desh shares that cat food with her furry friend

Here's proof:

NSFW

0e8a7c7a20f64c0600059a9c70181534.jpg
 
I cant wait for the pictures to come out when kyle is partying at Mar A Lago ! If you thought C-19 was bad you aint seen shit! Lefty heads will be exploding EVERYWHERE! Just BOOM! Nothing but big steaming piles of Ragoo everywhere! :laugh:
 
I cant wait for the pictures to come out when kyle is partying at Mar A Lago ! If you thought C-19 was bad you aint seen shit! Lefty heads will be exploding EVERYWHERE! Just BOOM! Nothing but big steaming piles of Ragoo everywhere! :laugh:

Trumpkins be like...

NlgDqtH.gif
 
Maybe Fuck Face Fowl will post a pic purporting to portray her prodigious PayPal payments to the GoFundMe accounts set up for the "heroes".
LOL...Good chance, I'd say...there's a "receipt" somewhere here from PP...they loved seeing that....)
 
Foul had planned on throwing a big celebration party for Rosenbloom but he couldnt really get there and she thought it would be a pretty poor idea to bring the party to where he's at ,...so......... It all just kinda took a shit I guess. Screwed again,... no party! :|
 
The evidence they were allowed to see


If they had seen him repeatedly punch a girl and then chase her down to punch her some more


And then seen him partying with proud boys while underage drinking in a bar AFTER he killed two people


Things might be different


Now they will know those facts

Those are all things that are legally irrelevant to the charges against him.

Do we know why he chased a girl and punched her? Did she provike him? Did she throw something at him? Did she spit on him?

There are very good and valid reasons why that kind of PREJUDICIAL evidence is not allowed in trials.

Just like in the excessive force trials of police officers where the jury is not allowed to see videos of the "victim" engaging in criminal activity prior to the contact with police that led up to whatever caused the trial.

The trial was about two very specifc incidents, not what happened prior to or subsequent to them.
 
The jury apparently was attentive at trial and took itself seriously spending three days to reach a verdict. Working under the constraints they had, the jurors probably deserved the judge's praise. Whether Rittenhouse
morally deserves his new found celebrity is a totally different question.
 
Back
Top