Into the Night
Contributor
He'll get all the hot Nazi chicks.
![]()
![]()
Why would he want them? Kyle is a conservative, not a socialist.
He'll get all the hot Nazi chicks.
![]()
![]()
And then there was the praise and applause for a defense witness who also happened to be a veteran. There was his cell phone ringing at different times, playing some patriotic song that is also Trump's rally song. He didn't even try to appear unbiased.
But still, the prosecution bears the responsibility for the failure to achieve a conviction. Wonder if they will appeal?
Why would he want them? Kyle is a conservative, not a socialist.
Said the hypocrite who spent weeks going after David Hogg, Parkland survivor, for his activism. "He should be in school." "Why isn't he going to college?" (Hoggs gets a Harvard scholarship.) "He'll never go to Harvard." (Hogg is a sophomore at Harvard.*) And then there was your bashing of Greta Thunberg and your smarmy commands for her to go to school.
https://dailynorthwestern.com/2021/...and-long-term-hopes-for-gun-control-movement/
They only like the Kyle like kids
That is the curse this young man bares
No one will care about him
Only the image they created out of his sad life and shitty actions as a child
He’s in hell
Rittenhouse verdict sets new legal precedent on White Privilege
[FONT=&]OPINION: The Rittenhouse Privilege has set a precedent that permits individuals to claim self-defense in the most outrageous of cases.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]Kyle Rittenhouse being found not guilty on all counts after more than 24 hours of deliberations can be summed up with one simple phrase: White privilege. It’s an all too familiar theme we witness when White defendants are on trial for killing us.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]The privilege that Rittenhouse displayed and benefited from, however, was clearly on another level.
When privilege is raised in the legal arena, it is referring to communications between certain individuals that are protected – communication between husband and wife, doctor and patient, attorney and client.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]I dare say Kyle Rittenhouse was cloaked with a privilege you cannot find in any legal precedent – The Rittenhouse Privilege. Throughout the trial there were instances in which it was quite apparent that the scales of justice tipped in favor of Kyle Rittenhouse.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]Let’s start with the jury makeup. After the jury process, 18 individuals were selected to listen to the trial. Of these 18 individuals, 12 were selected at random by the defendant, Kyle Rittenhouse, to deliberate. These individuals consisted of seven women and five men – only one was a person of color.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]The next thing to consider is the venue. The case was tried in Kenosha, which according to Census data is over 75% White. In the past, Kenosha country voted Democratic but went for Donald Trump in the 2016 election. It is also particularly important to consider the fact that Wisconsin is a gun friendly state. But we must also ask ourselves Gun Friendly toward whom?
https://news.yahoo.com/rittenhouse-verdict-sets-legal-precedent-184324203.html
[/FONT]
The kid has a miserable future ahead of him
Poor sad pEarl.
![]()
Yep, what's done is done.
So much for the pre-excuses we heard if they had come back with a guilty verdict. "(Unnamed source) said that the jurors are afraid that the rioters will burn the city down and kill them and their families if he's acquitted."![]()
The evidence they were allowed to see
If they had seen him repeatedly punch a girl and then chase her down to punch her some more
And then seen him partying with proud boys while underage drinking in a bar AFTER he killed two people
Things might be different
Now they will know those facts
Hate now rules the life of Kyle rittenhouse
ThatOwlWoman, thinks they can appeal the verdict!They can't.
The jury apparently was attentive at trial and took itself seriously spending three days to reach a verdict. Working under the constraints they had, the jurors probably deserved the judge's praise. Whether Rittenhouse
morally deserves his new found celebrity is a totally different question.
So dumb. Nomad already did an excellent job of explaining the facts to you. Do you need things drawn out in crayon or what?
Yes the video of the incident shows his intent
A girl fight where he attacks one of the girls
And seems to enjoy punching her so much that when she runs away he chased her to punch her some more
Love of violence
The proud boy Party shows he is a racist who was PROUD of the killing
Intent
What was on the audio portion of the video?
Did yu hear any verbal exchanges between them?
What transpired minutes before he video started that MIGHT have provoked him to hit this girl?
Since yiu were not there and did not witness what happened prior to a video clip, you are not in a position to make such a claim.
And again, it is not what he was on trail for.
Which of course begs the question, if he assaulted this girl, why was he not charged with assault?
But anyway, I'm not going to continue arguing with you about it because I know from past experience all you ever bring to any argument on one of these kinds of issues related to black victimhood, will be anger and emotion.
No offense intended, BTW.
I have only watched it a couple of times
It was uploaded by a few kids involved at the time so I believe there are more than one version
It was august before he killed people
Two girls are yelling at each other
They start to engage physically
He grabs the girl in the black top from the back
As he holds her he closed fist start punching her in the back
She gets pulled away from him and he goes after her so he can’t punch her more times in the back
It seems that is the agreed on take from Everyone present and the tapes
He was enjoying punching a female and didn’t want to stop
She was quite a bit smaller than he is, as well. Why didn't he get charged? My guess is he took off and no one knew who he was. The guys that took the video that I saw didn't know who he was either; they just saw a fight as they were driving and stopped and videoed it. It wasn't till after Kenosha that they realized that the kid punching the short girl was Rittenhouse.
It doesn't matter *what* went on before he attacked her. She tried to get away and he ran after her. You know, just like HE did after threatening and then shooting ppl.


She was quite a bit smaller than he is, as well. Why didn't he get charged? My guess is he took off and no one knew who he was. The guys that took the video that I saw didn't know who he was either; they just saw a fight as they were driving and stopped and videoed it. It wasn't till after Kenosha that they realized that the kid punching the short girl was Rittenhouse.
It doesn't matter *what* went on before he attacked her. She tried to get away and he ran after her. You know, just like HE did after threatening and then shooting ppl.