Students at AZ State Univ. demand Rittenhouse be EXPELLED.

Poor Excuse for a Human said:
Found in Wisconsin code under damages for libel. Deciding that a homicide is murder is one of a number of possible interpretations of that act and there can be no question that Rittenhouse committed a homicide since his defense was that he was justified in committing it. You will find that the Az code isn't much different from Wisconsin.
Click to expand...

Good luck with that defense, Counselor.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Found in Wisconsin code under damages for libel.


Deciding that a homicide is murder is one of a number of possible interpretations of that act and there can be no question that Rittenhouse committed a homicide since his defense was that he was justified in committing it.

You will find that the Az code isn't much different from Wisconsin.
Click to expand...

Rittenhouse isn't a "public figure." The head of a large corporation is. A politician in a higher position is.

A public figure is a person of great public interest or fame, such as a politician, celebrity, or sports hero. The term usually used in the context of libel and defamation actions, where the standards of proof are higher if the party claiming defamation is a public figure and therefore has to prove disparaging remarks were made with actual malice.

A person may also be considered a "limited purpose" public figure by having thrust themselves to the forefront of particular public controversies in order to influence the resolution of the issues involved. The determination is made on a case-by-case basis, taking the particular facts into account.
Click to expand...

Rittenhouse may have wide notoriety, but that doesn't make him a public figure.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Found in Wisconsin code under damages for libel.


Deciding that a homicide is murder is one of a number of possible interpretations of that act and there can be no question that Rittenhouse committed a homicide since his defense was that he was justified in committing it.
Click to expand...

you are applying the rule backwards......they called him a murderer........the issue isn't how many interpretations of homicide there are........the issue is how many interpretations of murder there are.....
 
Legion said:
I'd be inclined to initiate an asset search, and look for contingent liability.
Click to expand...

I'd go for a max lawsuit against the individuals within these groups that can be identified using small claims court. Hit them each for a $3,500 lawsuit and force them into small claims court. Hire a lawyer to run all the cases giving say 50% as their expense to do it. You win if they fail to show. If you already have good evidence and other wins, you're likely to win again. Then you can spend years harassing them to pay up.

If they go to get a job post graduation, it will be an issue with many companies that see you have open lawsuits against them as well as a bad mark on their credit score making even getting an apartment more difficult. Win like 10 to 20 cases and you're talking $35,000 and up for a total take. Easy, cheap, and once you win a few, the rest fall like dominos.

Go a step further with the most nasty of the bunch and try to get on The People's Court or Judge Judy with your case. Let the whole nation see what total assholes these radical Leftists really are.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I'd go for a max lawsuit against the individuals within these groups that can be identified using small claims court. Hit them each for a $3,500 lawsuit and force them into small claims court. Hire a lawyer to run all the cases giving say 50% as their expense to do it. You win if they fail to show. If you already have good evidence and other wins, you're likely to win again. Then you can spend years harassing them to pay up. If they go to get a job post graduation, it will be an issue with many companies that see you have open lawsuits against them as well as a bad mark on their credit score making even getting an apartment more difficult. Win like 10 to 20 cases and you're talking $35,000 and up for a total take. Easy, cheap, and once you win a few, the rest fall like dominos. Go a step further with the most nasty of the bunch and try to get on The People's Court or Judge Judy with your case. Let the whole nation see what total assholes these radical Leftists really are.
Click to expand...

Meh.

Their organizations likely have assets, and I'm certain the University that allowed them to defame Mr. Rittenhouse does.

The fact is that almost all civil litigation is settled pretrial and no public disclosure of terms is normally made.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Rittenhouse isn't a "public figure." The head of a large corporation is. A politician in a higher position is.



Rittenhouse may have wide notoriety, but that doesn't make him a public figure.
Click to expand...

A public figure is a person of great public interest
Click to expand...

So Rittenhouse has not been a person of great public interest?

In the Supreme Court ruling that defines public figure, one of the deciding factors is whether the person has access to the media. There can be little question that Rittenhouse has access to the media as he has appeared on Fox News and was followed around by Fox during the trial.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
you are applying the rule backwards......they called him a murderer........the issue isn't how many interpretations of homicide there are........the issue is how many interpretations of murder there are.....
Click to expand...

So much for convincing the jury. You just lost them with your claim that murder can only mean one thing as you murdered the English language.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Let's see...

The four student groups that want Rittenhouse gone are:

Students for Socialism
MEChA (Movimiento Estudiantil Chicanx de Aztlán)
Students for Justice in Palestine
Multicultural Solidarity Coalition

So, one tiny group of Socialists, two tiny groups that support terrorism, genocide, and racism, and one of general radical Leftist nutbags, that amount in total to probably less than 100 students (out of over 53,000 on ASU's campuses or about 1/10th of 1%) want Rittenhouse gone.

https://arizonadailyindependent.com...ittenhouse-to-be-expelled-banned-from-campus/

It'll be interesting to see how many students (and non-student Leftist crazies) show up in support of this for their protest Wednesday...
Click to expand...

Lol, I'm sure glad no Aztlan ( Mexicans) or Palestinians ever killed anybody!
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
So Rittenhouse has not been a person of great public interest?

In the Supreme Court ruling that defines public figure, one of the deciding factors is whether the person has access to the media. There can be little question that Rittenhouse has access to the media as he has appeared on Fox News and was followed around by Fox during the trial.
Click to expand...

Nope. Rittenhouse didn't set out to become a national figure. Rittenhouse got interviewed by Fox, but until he starts going on Fox or other news stations of his own volition rather than by invitation, he isn't really a public figure. He simply has wide notoriety and recognition.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Nope. Rittenhouse didn't set out to become a national figure. Rittenhouse got interviewed by Fox, but until he starts going on Fox or other news stations of his own volition rather than by invitation, he isn't really a public figure. He simply has wide notoriety and recognition.
Click to expand...

So your argument is that Rittenhouse didn't actually set out to be on Fox News but they tricked him into being on?
 
Legion said:
Meh.

Their organizations likely have assets, and I'm certain the University that allowed them to defame Mr. Rittenhouse does.

The fact is that almost all civil litigation is settled pretrial and no public disclosure of terms is normally made.
Click to expand...

YEP. SOMEONE IS FUNDING THOSE ASSHOLES...
 
Grokmaster said:
SOMEONE IS FUNDING THOSE ASSHOLES...
Click to expand...

iu
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top