cancel2 2022
Canceled
you will have to do better than an opinion piece from a publication that pushes climate change
She's a fucktard who like a turd won't flush down the crapper.
you will have to do better than an opinion piece from a publication that pushes climate change
She's a fucktard who like a turd won't flush down the crapper.
LMAO! It's not an opinion piece. it's an investigation. Try reading it, if you're not too scared.
it is opinion with no data to support it
No it's not. You didn't read it and now you're lying about reading it because all you do is lie.
Every single compulsion you have is to be untruthful.
It's like you have a behavioral disorder.
you did not read your own Article, not one piece of Exxon documentation is presented to support the opinion
Incorrect, as usual:
In their eight-month-long investigation, reporters at InsideClimate News interviewed former Exxon employees, scientists and federal officials and analyzed hundreds of pages of internal documents. They found that the company’s knowledge of climate change dates back to July 1977, when its senior scientist James Black delivered a sobering message on the topic. “In the first place, there is general scientific agreement that the most likely manner in which mankind is influencing the global climate is through carbon dioxide release from the burning of fossil fuels," Black told Exxon’s management committee. A year later he warned Exxon that doubling CO2 gases in the atmosphere would increase average global temperatures by two or three degrees—a number that is consistent with the scientific consensus today. He continued to warn that “present thinking holds that man has a time window of five to 10 years before the need for hard decisions regarding changes in energy strategies might become critical." In other words, Exxon needed to act.
that is opinion, you know the difference, right? not one piece if Exxon document to back up this opinion. Its not your fault you don't know the difference. LMAO
that is opinion, you know the difference, right? not one piece if Exxon document to back up this opinion. Its not your fault you don't know the difference. LMAO
I imagine they had plenty of hard data to back up the claims in 1977 that we have 5 - 10 years tops to act
imagining is not proof
correct, but we have proof that he was wrong about his assertions 25 years later
if we are past the point of acting what are you going on about?What proof do you think we have that he was wrong?
Even Exxon admits his data is correct, and we've clearly seen a warming of the planet (for at least twenty consecutive years), superstorms (every year now), superdroughts (lasting years), and climate population migration (Root cause of the Syrian Civil War).
Personally, I believe he was right that in 1977 we only had 5-10 years to act; I believe we are already past the point of no return on climate.
if we are past the point of acting what are you going on about?
Accountability and justice.
Those who destroyed the planet should face accountability for doing so.
we over consume - but you idiots keep wanting us to consume more by taking from the few and given to the many on the one nation on earth that already over consumes
get in line shit stain - you are the problem, not the solution
No other state did as poorly during Delta as Florida did, and it's 100% because of Anatta:
![]()
No other state did as poorly during Delta as Florida did, and it's 100% because of Anatta:
![]()
Assuming you do not live there?
What the fuck do you care how many Floridians get jabbed?