Unemployment is 3.9 percent

It is directly involved by making too much easy money available.

The Fed didn't make any easy money available to anyone during the housing bubble, and you can't show that it did.

The Fed didn't get involved until AFTER the housing market had already collapsed, and it got involved by opening its discount window to lenders...where it lent banks trillions to loan to individuals and businesses to stave off the economic collapse your shitty policies caused.
 
Yes you did...you defended Bush on this thread when you tried to blame his housing collapse on Democrats who didn't control Congress and hadn't been in the White House for 3 years.
I do not defend Bush.
I bet in about a year, if you're not dead from COVID,
Covid19 does not kill.
you're going to be saying the exact opposite after Trump costs the GOP seats in the House and Senate this year.
Speculation. No, I won't be saying that Trump is a RINO. Trump is a conservative.
 
The Fed was directly involved in the dot com crash too.

Nope...who told you that?

The dotcom bubble was caused by tax cuts:

To provide more compelling evidence that the 1997 tax cut affected volatility (and mitigate concerns about omitted correlated variables), we focus on cross-sectional tests which are designed to detect the differential responses in return volatility of stocks with different characteristics. We hypothesize that the effect of a capital gains tax change on stock return volatility should vary depending upon dividend policy and the size of the unrealized capital losses (or gains). Consistent with expectations, we find that non- and lower dividend-paying stocks experienced a larger increase in return volatility than high dividend-paying stocks. We also find that stocks with large unrealized capital losses had a larger increase in return volatility after a capital gains tax rate reduction than stocks with small unrealized capital losses. However, we do not find a similar relation with unrealized capital gains.
https://www.businessinsider.com/heres-why-the-dot-com-bubble-began-and-why-it-popped-2010-12
 
Lie. RQAA.

You jsut keep lying because you know you can't hang in this debate with me.

If I was you, I would be linking to that same post over and over again until it was addressed.

So what you do is say something dumb, then when asked to prove it, lie about already doing so, and then send everyone on a wild goose chase to find nothing.

I see right through you.
 
The Fed didn't make any easy money available to anyone during the housing bubble, and you can't show that it did.
Already have. Denial of history.
The Fed didn't get involved until AFTER the housing market had already collapsed, and it got involved by opening its discount window to lenders...where it lent banks trillions to loan to individuals and businesses to stave off the economic collapse your shitty policies caused.
It didn't make any government policy.
M1 is not the interest rate.
 
Fallacy fallacy.

"Widespread" is a buzzword you used to establish a new standard when it comes to measuring an economic collapse.

But the problem is that by establishing that in December 2008, you can't say Obama ruined the recovery because the collapse was "widespread" the moment before Obama took office.

So you just did the JPP equivalent of drinking your own piss just to own da libs.
 
The Fed didn't make any easy money available to anyone during the housing bubble, and you can't show that it did.

The Fed didn't get involved until AFTER the housing market had already collapsed, and it got involved by opening its discount window to lenders...where it lent banks trillions to loan to individuals and businesses to stave off the economic collapse your shitty policies caused.

Lie. RQAA.
 
Back
Top