Unemployment is 3.9 percent

[LV426]

RQAA. Attempted proof by Stone.

Wait a second, YOU SAID YOU POSTED THE PROOF.

But now you're changing your story to say it was Stone.

So then link to Stone's post, since you clearly didn't do the work or research here, and are relying on other people to do things you said you did.

So you didn't provide proof, you lied earlier on this thread.

And now everyone can read it and see.

 

[Into the Night]

So you're saying that the Fed, under the direction of Democrats who didn't control Congress in 2004, gave banks money to do risky subprime lending?

RQAA.

So where's that paper trail?

RQAA.

Why would the Fed or Democrats do that when Democrats and Clinton all put restrictions on GSE's in place in 2000 specifically to prevent risky lending?

He didn't. RQAA.

 

[Into the Night]

Wait a second, YOU SAID YOU POSTED THE PROOF.

But now you're changing your story to say it was Stone.

So then link to Stone's post, since you clearly didn't do the work or research here, and are relying on other people to do things you said you did.

So you didn't provide proof, you lied earlier on this thread.

And now everyone can read it and see.

Semantics fallacy. Word mangling. Trolling. No argument presented.

 

[Into the Night]

You don't seem to know what the Federal Reserve even is.

I know exactly what it is. It is an unconstitutional organization created by Congress. By nationalizing money, it is essentially communism.
It also nationalized clearing services, also communism. It regulates all banks...fascism. It is directed by Congress.

 

[Into the Night]

OK, so now's the part where you prove it by posting the part of the housing laws that you say caused the crash.

Go ahead.

Post it.

Own me with your magnificent research skills.

RQAA.

 

[Into the Night]

Repeating the mantra doesn't make it so, and it's not going to provide you with the personal comfort you seem to be seeking.

You also can't prove this, and every time it's asked of you, you fallacy yourself.

Already have shown this. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Another fallacy here...you're doing these fallacies because you're not buttoned up on the facts like I am.

Your fallacies, dude.
Buzzword fallacy. Learn what 'fact' means.

 

[Into the Night]

The argument presented is that your brain damage stems from the long-haul COVID you have because you didn't wear a mask, get vaccinated, or wash your hands.

Insult fallacies. Trolling. No argument presented. Paradox M. Paradox V. Irrational.

 

[LV426]

He didn't.

Again, you're wrong and avoiding debate:

"(In 2000) HUD restricted Freddie and Fannie, saying it would not credit them for loans they purchased that had abusively high costs or that were granted without regard to the borrower's ability to repay."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/09/AR2008060902626_2.html

In 2004, the 2000 rules were dropped and high‐risk loans were again counted toward affordable housing goals.
https://books.google.com/books?id=a...nted toward affordable housing goals.&f=false

 

[Into the Night]

In my signature is a thread where I’m trying to warn about the coming crash

All you right wing idiots were castigating me for the prediction


You are an idiot

Bigotry.

 

[LV426]

Semantics fallacy. Word mangling. Trolling. No argument presented.

You lied.

First you lied about the cause of the collapse.

Then you lied about posting proof of the cause of the collapse.

Now you're lying about Stone being the one who posted the proof.

So you're a liar.

 

[Into the Night]

The crash had already started and "widespread" means nothing here.

Denial of English. Semantics fallacy.

And you're also arguing then, that the economy was not in recovery by the time Obama was sworn in...so your stupid ass just contradicted an argument your stupid ass made earlier on this thread!

Hallucination. I made no such statement.

How could Obama have ruined the recovery when, as you just said here, the crash only became "widespread" in December 2008?

RQAA.

What a clod. You walked right into that one.

Insult fallacy. Attempted proof by Stone.

 

[LV426]

I know exactly what it is. It is an unconstitutional organization created by Congress. By nationalizing money, it is essentially communism.

How does the Fed "nationalize money"?

It also nationalized clearing services

What clearing services and how/when did it do that?

It regulates all banks...fascism.

No, the Fed doesn't necessarily "regulate" the banks. The Fed loans the banks money when the banks ask for it, for the banks to loan to consumers and businesses.

That, and establishing the interest rates are all the Fed does.

The Fed is not involved in mortgage lending and never has been.

 

[LV426]

RQAA.

You never posted it, you lied about it.

Then you changed your story to say someone else posted it, but that was a lie too because Stone never posted shit.

And if you're using Stone as your primary research, you might as well just give yourself a swift punch in the nuts.

 

[Into the Night]

According to Bush, they did.

And Bush was your guy until it became too hard to defend him and his garbage beliefs and policies.

That's why you've only NOW started calling Bush a RINO...in about 10 years you're going to call Trump a RINO too.

I never defended Bush. Bush is a RINO.
I defend Trump. Trump is not a RINO. Trump is a conservative.

 

[LV426]

Already have shown this..

Again, you're lying.

You said yourself that you didn't show this, that someone else did (stone).

But you can't even find that post you're lying about.

 

[Into the Night]

Again, you're wrong and avoiding debate:

"(In 2000) HUD restricted Freddie and Fannie, saying it would not credit them for loans they purchased that had abusively high costs or that were granted without regard to the borrower's ability to repay."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/09/AR2008060902626_2.html

In 2004, the 2000 rules were dropped and high‐risk loans were again counted toward affordable housing goals.
https://books.google.com/books?id=a...nted toward affordable housing goals.&f=false

Not about HUD. Pivot fallacy.

 

[LV426]

Learn what 'fact' means.

RQAA

 

[LV426]

Insult fallacies. Trolling. No argument presented. Paradox M. Paradox V. Irrational.

Then how come you are acting like you have brain damage on this thread?

 

[Into the Night]

The unemployment figures give no clue about the actual amount of unemployment,
but smaller unemployment figures are still better than big ones.

Paradox. Arguing both sides of a paradox is irrational.