Hard pass, Tweedle Dum.
Finally, intelligent gun regulations
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
Hard pass, Tweedle Dum.
Sure, anyone can have a pool....as long as they can afford to pay.
What does this have to do making rights only available to those who can pay?
That's nice. What do you dream about? Do you have night emissions or are you too old?
How many did Trump lose? This isn't about losing seats. This is about a massive red tsunami. Democrats brought this on because they really are that stupid.
You know this how? Oh yeah, it's because you say so right?
But alas, Trump isn't in office and as a result of reversing everything Trump did, and the Afghanistan failure and passing trillions in spending his first few months in office, we have massive inflation and supply failures.
Biden promised us he would unite us; then he divided us with his angry petulant partisan hackery.
Biden claimed he would end the pandemic; then he kicked that can to the States.
Biden declared that anyone who presided over all those Covid deaths, in a dumb partisan hack attack on Trump, should not be President; then he had more deaths in his first year.
I know how desperate you Biden supporters are to put lipstick on that pig. But it is still a pig.
People with an "attractive nuisance" like a backyard pool usually do pay more in homeowner's insurance premiums.
I don't recall anyone ever giving away free guns to the poor, do you? If you're poor and want a gun, you can expect to pay for it, and its ammo too. Consider the insurance just a price hike.
How awesome for you, Tweedle Dum.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
gay
Me neither. I do recall the idea to change annual fees and insurance. Why the conniption over doing the same for all other rights?
You can have all the rights you like as long as you pay the requisite fees, taxes and insurance. Isn't that the precedent being advocated here?
Since it is constitutional for states to ban assault weapons I think buying insurance is less of a legal issue. Some states require a class to get a license to carry a handgun which seems no less onerous than buying insurance---not that I think insurance accomplishes anything.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
"very stupid" is a good start.
Might as well give it up, toilet brush. Ain't gonna read it. 
Today, 04:15 PM
Truth Detector
Insane Level of Addiction
This message is hidden because Truth Detector is on your ignore list.
Today, 04:15 PM
Truth Detector
Insane Level of Addiction
This message is hidden because Truth Detector is on your ignore list.
Yakuda
Verified User
The reasoning is that reduced access to gun means less killing. When I applied that reasoning to obesity, a serious health issue in America, reduced access to food means reduced obesity, all the genius could muster is ...this is about obesity.
Nothing suggest failure than a slippery slope unconstitutional argument or claim.
Again, how would this make our streets safer?
Requiring classes for concealed carry is unconstitutional as well.
Again, how would that make our streets safer?
Do u think Dylan Roof or Stephen Paddock was worried about being sued?
...fucking stupid bitchYour sentence is meaningless.
And I am tired of looking at your childish posts with their ridiculous fonts and signatures in a vain attempt to get people to pay attention to them.
We are done here.