SCOTUS prediction

Dutch Uncle said:
Sure, no doubt there are a lot of dumbasses pushing the Republican Party to repeat the same mistake again. See Einstein's definition of Insanity.

Whether it's enough to get the nomination depends upon who else is running and what happens between now and November 2024. I expect a lot of investigations to be completed followed by arrests and trials. That'll alter the course of RW politics.
Click to expand...

More than two thirds of American voters never want to see trump again, but over 75% of republican primary voters want to get trump back again. There is nothing the Republican Party can do about it. The nomination is literally trump's for the taking.
 
1643407804324-png.914917
 
Walt said:
More than two thirds of American voters never want to see trump again, but over 75% of republican primary voters want to get trump back again. There is nothing the Republican Party can do about it. The nomination is literally trump's for the taking.
Click to expand...

Trump will be too busy fending off abuse via the legal system.
 
Walt said:
More than two thirds of American voters never want to see trump again, but over 75% of republican primary voters want to get trump back again. There is nothing the Republican Party can do about it. The nomination is literally trump's for the taking.
Click to expand...

About 70% of active American voters are not Republicans. Conversely, about 70% of active American voters are not Democrats. The Ops section of each party understands why but not everyone on JPP does.

Yes, Trump can take the nomination and the Republicans can lose again in 2024. The good news is that Trump is phobic about losing. Such a personality produces a form of cowardice because they are risk adversive: Trump won't run again unless he knows he can win.

OTOH, if he's crazy enough he might want to win but then he'd start looking crazy to most Americans too. He flip-flopped on vaccinations because he blows with the political winds. He's desperate to win and not be seen as a loser. He won't ever risk losing because he's a fucking chickenshit.

Besides, if the militias take a piece out of his ass, he'll be hiding in a bunker for the rest of his life. Why? Because he's a chickenshit.
 
In the real world, Hillary Clinton is not in the running for Supreme Court Justice. She is too old. She is happily retired.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
She also had zero executive experience and zero VP experience. Look at how well she's doing there. /snark

Listing Harris as a possible nominee for SCOTUS is pure, unadulterated Fox News Bullshit. The idiots pushing it are either lying/trolling or stupid. Some are both.
Click to expand...

It’s difficult to do well or poorly at the job of VP, it’s not really a job.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Interesting but confusing.

First, I still don't know who those people are.

Second, if I tell them "I'm delusional" they'll ask "what are your delusions". All I'll be able to say is that some asshole atheist on the Internet said I should ask.

Why won't you tell me what delusions I'm having?
Click to expand...

Well first of all you say you aren't a Democrat!
 
Wolverine said:
Well first of all you say you aren't a Democrat!
Click to expand...

I'm not. Never have been. Never voted for a Democratic President.

Although there was never a Democrat that I supported in other elections, after 2012, I began voting for the Libertarian candidates or, if none were there, for the challenger regardless of party. Inevitably there were Democrats and Republicans challengers who got my vote even though I don't remember them...or even who won.

You, Matt, keep proving you're a lip-service Christian, you're a liar and a bully. You're the antithesis of what being a Christian is all about. That's your problem and no one else's. By lying about me, by making claims you can't support, you prove you are not a Christian.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
I'm not. Never have been. Never voted for a Democratic President.

Although there was never a Democrat that I supported in other elections, after 2012, I began voting for the Libertarian candidates or, if none were there, for the challenger regardless of party. Inevitably there were Democrats and Republicans challengers who got my vote even though I don't remember them...or even who won.

You, Matt, keep proving you're a lip-service Christian, you're a liar and a bully. You're the antithesis of what being a Christian is all about. That's your problem and no one else's. By lying about me, by making claims you can't support, you prove you are not a Christian.
Click to expand...

I am a Liar and Bully? Look at your posts, they are some of the nastiest on the board! I could make more positive posts and you would continue to be an arse!
 
LV426 said:
Wow gee...for someone who is supposedly too busy to debate, you sure seem to have enough time to start multiple threads on the same topic.

Kinda makes your whole "it's impossible for me to respond in 5 minutes" whine a load of horseshit.

You wanted to debate, then set forth a crazy rule THAT I ACCEPTED, but then refuse to accept my rule, citing "impossibility" after posting multiple threads on the same topic within a 12 hour span.

So it sounds to me like you thought you could cheat, but are now mad at me and willing to completely run from the debate YOU WANTED because you wouldn't be able to rely on your tricks or your Nazi pals.

Fucking cheater.
Click to expand...

Baby whiner. :rofl2:
 
LV426 said:
You are the whiner...you whined that it would be impossible for you to respond within 5 minutes, but didn't say why it would be impossible for you.

I think you're just lazy, is all.
Click to expand...

I explained it to you before. Since you have no life and lots of time here, re-read my previous post. :rofl2:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top