Yakuda
Verified User
Just an umbrella topic. And, I gave you a specific example. What part did you not understand?
No you didn't.
Just an umbrella topic. And, I gave you a specific example. What part did you not understand?
An "artificial boom and bust cycle" created during a wartime economy.
You can't be that ignorant and claim to be more than a parrot.No you didn't.
I was including actually requiring the private sector to switch from peacetime production to wartime production.It's not artificial its a result of circumstances just like bottle water becomes more expensive during a hurricane. The only reason to oppose a free market economy is emotion. People attribute the high price for water during a hurricane to greed. That's lazy and stupid.
You can't be that ignorant and claim to be more than a parrot.
I was including actually requiring the private sector to switch from peacetime production to wartime production.
So what. Any parrot can talk.You're as stupid a rock but I'm talking to you.
I was including actually requiring the private sector to switch from peacetime production to wartime production.
So what. Any parrot can talk.
Not at all; it could change the entire market structure. Price action proves it.It's irrelevant. The only thing that changes is who the customer is.
You have the most fallacies. I would be more embarrassed.Which is more than a rock can do
You have the most fallacies. I would be more embarrassed.
Right-wingers are just plain lairs. Where are your better solutions at lower cost?And you have the least specific information. Youre like the hyperactive kid who uses lits of words.but doesnt say one useful fucking thing. Fucking retard
That doesn't require a suspension of free market principles.
doesn't it?
"you must create these products for the war" is free market?
bullshit.
I didn't say it didnt happen I said it wasn't required. Seenrhe difference? My suspicion is No
i guess we have a different understanding of what wartime economy means.
operation warp speed, also fascism.
I have no problem resorting to the fewest fallacies. What is your excuse?
Why institute price controls in the first place if free market economics works in all cases?