Anyone noticed how the election lies have evolved?

BartenderElite

Verified User
For the 1st year, it was all about suitcases under the tables, ballots being driven in "after midnight," rigged voting machines and all of the other "Kraken" nonsense that was thoroughly debunked.

Not hearing much of that anymore. Now, it's all about the "unconstitutional" way that states ran their elections. Which, of course, no actual court has concluded.

When historians write about this period, there will be a big clown nose on every "Big Lie" proponent (if they include pictures and illustrations).
 
For the 1st year, it was all about suitcases under the tables, ballots being driven in "after midnight," rigged voting machines and all of the other "Kraken" nonsense that was thoroughly debunked.

Not hearing much of that anymore. Now, it's all about the "unconstitutional" way that states ran their elections. Which, of course, no actual court has concluded.

When historians write about this period, there will be a big clown nose on every "Big Lie" proponent (if they include pictures and illustrations).

Pathology of lies. Always a new story.
 
For the 1st year, it was all about suitcases under the tables, ballots being driven in "after midnight," rigged voting machines and all of the other "Kraken" nonsense that was thoroughly debunked.

Not hearing much of that anymore. Now, it's all about the "unconstitutional" way that states ran their elections. Which, of course, no actual court has concluded.

When historians write about this period, there will be a big clown nose on every "Big Lie" proponent (if they include pictures and illustrations).

That's assuming that we manage to stop them in time. Otherwise, the Big Lie period will be as anathema to discuss in school as they're trying to make it illegal to talk about slavery, homosexuality, and race.
 
Anyone notice how the increasingly terrirfied left NEVER POSTS ABOUT PRES.MORON'S "ACCOMPLISHMENTS" ?
 
I have been quite consistent - the big lie is that the democrats want fair elections

you want a rigged playing field.

you want debates to be one sided - even to the point of feeding debate questions to your preferred candidates

you want to jail journalists that leak bad stuff your party does and encourage big tech to censor your opponents

you love the idea of mail in votes that are impossible to vet - even before anyone has been in a debate and articulated their position

you will fight tooth and nail to restrict ballot access when it helps you gain power (just ask the green party about that!)
 
For the 1st year, it was all about suitcases under the tables, ballots being driven in "after midnight," rigged voting machines and all of the other "Kraken" nonsense that was thoroughly debunked.

Not hearing much of that anymore. Now, it's all about the "unconstitutional" way that states ran their elections. Which, of course, no actual court has concluded.

When historians write about this period, there will be a big clown nose on every "Big Lie" proponent (if they include pictures and illustrations).

No one was allowed to investigate any of that stuff. They burned down a warehouse full of them in GA, I think.
 
For the 1st year, it was all about suitcases under the tables, ballots being driven in "after midnight," rigged voting machines and all of the other "Kraken" nonsense that was thoroughly debunked.

Not hearing much of that anymore. Now, it's all about the "unconstitutional" way that states ran their elections. Which, of course, no actual court has concluded.

When historians write about this period, there will be a big clown nose on every "Big Lie" proponent (if they include pictures and illustrations).
that may be all you heard but certainly not all that was said.
 
that may be all you heard but certainly not all that was said.

No, of course not. Righties have latched on to EVERY single conspiracy theory & false story that appears on the internet. And there are so many of them.

From the outside looking in, it's pure desperation.
 

Would that alone be enough to get together 81 million votes? I don't think it was.

That's why they had to do it some more for 2+ weeks after the election and probably employ some other methods, too.

All of that type of cheating wasn't enough to win at the regular time.
 
Would that alone be enough to get together 81 million votes? I don't think it was.

That's why they had to do it some more for 2+ weeks after the election and probably employ some other methods, too.

All of that type of cheating wasn't enough to win at the regular time.

Nothing like rampant speculation without evidence.
 
For the 1st year, it was all about suitcases under the tables, ballots being driven in "after midnight," rigged voting machines and all of the other "Kraken" nonsense that was thoroughly debunked.

Not hearing much of that anymore. Now, it's all about the "unconstitutional" way that states ran their elections. Which, of course, no actual court has concluded.

When historians write about this period, there will be a big clown nose on every "Big Lie" proponent (if they include pictures and illustrations).

I have also seen recent stories about the electoral vote never being certified because Congress was interrupted in their business by the January 6 riot. They are apparently unaware Congress went back into session and completed the electoral count that evening.
 
I have also seen recent stories about the electoral vote never being certified because Congress was interrupted in their business by the January 6 riot. They are apparently unaware Congress went back into session and completed the electoral count that evening.

They've tried every single thing. Whatever sticks. And nothing has.

It's just sour grapes.
 
Back
Top