NYT admits Jan 6 committee all about getting Trump

T. A. Gardner

T. A. Gardner

Serial Thread Killer
I've been saying this for a while now, the Jan 6 committee is all about Trump 'impeachment' #3, not about anything else much.

He had means, motive and opportunity. But did Donald J. Trump commit a crime?
A House committee explicitly declared that he did by conspiring to overturn an election. The attorney general, however, has not weighed in. And a jury of his peers may never hear the case.
For two hours on Thursday night, the House committee investigating the Capitol attack detailed what it called Mr. Trump’s “illegal” and “unconstitutional” seven-part plan to prevent the transfer of power. The panel invoked the Justice Department, citing charges of seditious conspiracy filed against some of the attackers, and seemed to be laying out a road map for Attorney General Merrick B. Garland to their central target.
Click to expand...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...pc=U531&cvid=d7849e1a1e46472eb1702c50a83b4afb

It doesn't matter what side of this you're on, whether you like Trump or hate him, but rather everyone needs to admit what this committee is really about rather than claim some diversion.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I've been saying this for a while now, the Jan 6 committee is all about Trump 'impeachment' #3, not about anything else much.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...pc=U531&cvid=d7849e1a1e46472eb1702c50a83b4afb

It doesn't matter what side of this you're on, whether you like Trump or hate him, but rather everyone needs to admit what this committee is really about rather than claim some diversion.
Click to expand...

Please cite the actual text from the NY Times substantiating your claim.
 
BidenPresident said:
You cited "msn".
Click to expand...

MSM reprinted the article, and if you'd bothered to check the link--which you now admit you didn't do--you'd have known that. I can't link directly to NYT's articles without an account and paying them money, something I'm loathe to do as it is like having to pay to visit a trash dump.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
MSM reprinted the article, and if you'd bothered to check the link--which you now admit you didn't do--you'd have known that. I can't link directly to NYT's articles without an account and paying them money, something I'm loathe to do as it is like having to pay to visit a trash dump.
Click to expand...

Ok, you have no idea what the NY Times said.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I've been saying this for a while now, the Jan 6 committee is all about Trump 'impeachment' #3, not about anything else much.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...pc=U531&cvid=d7849e1a1e46472eb1702c50a83b4afb

It doesn't matter what side of this you're on, whether you like Trump or hate him, but rather everyone needs to admit what this committee is really about rather than claim some diversion.
Click to expand...

You are fucked


The people now will have the facts



Just like the day the Nixon tapes were played in public



You are fucked


It’s over


Crawl back up putins ass
 
But just to indulge you, here's the original NYT article

Jan. 6 Committee Appears to Lay Out Road Map for Prosecuting Trump
The first prime-time hearing into the Jan. 6 attack confronted the fundamental question that has haunted Donald J. Trump since he left office: Should he be prosecuted in a criminal court?
Click to expand...
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/11/us/politics/jan-6-prosecute-trump.html

And, the exact same quote I made in the OP. How retarded do you have to be not to accept a reprint as accurate?

He had means, motive and opportunity. But did Donald J. Trump commit a crime?
A House committee explicitly declared that he did by conspiring to overturn an election. The attorney general, however, has not weighed in. And a jury of his peers may never hear the case.
For two hours on Thursday night, the House committee investigating the Capitol attack detailed what it called Mr. Trump’s “illegal” and “unconstitutional” seven-part plan to prevent the transfer of power. The panel invoked the Justice Department, citing charges of seditious conspiracy filed against some of the attackers, and seemed to be laying out a road map for Attorney General Merrick B. Garland to their central target.
Click to expand...
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I've been saying this for a while now, the Jan 6 committee is all about Trump 'impeachment' #3, not about anything else much.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...pc=U531&cvid=d7849e1a1e46472eb1702c50a83b4afb

It doesn't matter what side of this you're on, whether you like Trump or hate him, but rather everyone needs to admit what this committee is really about rather than claim some diversion.
Click to expand...

It's about Trump breaking the law. If Trump broke the law, shouldn't be be held accountable?
Seems to be an open-and-shut case.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I've been saying this for a while now, the Jan 6 committee is all about Trump 'impeachment' #3, not about anything else much.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...pc=U531&cvid=d7849e1a1e46472eb1702c50a83b4afb

It doesn't matter what side of this you're on, whether you like Trump or hate him, but rather everyone needs to admit what this committee is really about rather than claim some diversion.
Click to expand...



I just read the whole article you fart muffin



It says nothing about it being a fake investigation
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top