Greta Thunberg busted deleting 2018 tweet because it's five years later

Greta Thunberg busted deleting 2018 tweet because it's five years later and humanity has yet to be destroyed


Greta Thunberg, when she isn't cussing up a storm and faking getting arrested, likes to make bold predictions about the sky falling. One prediction she made in 2018 is getting a second look. Greta thought she could be all slick and delete her tweet, but the internet much like the ozone layer and Wu-Tang Clan is forever.

Because it's five years after she tweeted the world was going to end in five years. Look out your window.


Reminds me of this:

https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/08/us/glaciers-national-park-2020-trnd/index.html

They never get tired of looking stupid. What gets me is they laugh at preachers who claim the end of the world is coming yet they do the exact same thing. Very funny.
 
Greta Thunberg busted deleting 2018 tweet because it's five years later and humanity has yet to be destroyed


Greta Thunberg, when she isn't cussing up a storm and faking getting arrested, likes to make bold predictions about the sky falling. One prediction she made in 2018 is getting a second look. Greta thought she could be all slick and delete her tweet, but the internet much like the ozone layer and Wu-Tang Clan is forever.

Because it's five years after she tweeted the world was going to end in five years. Look out your window.


So you hate this young woman along with blacks and liberals
 
Thunberg is a visionary, and one of our leaders for the future.

And make no mistake: the environment IS the issue of our time. It's the one thing that everything else hinges on. No other issue matters if we trash our planet to the point where it is barely habitable.
 
Thunberg is a visionary, and one of our leaders for the future.

And make no mistake: the environment IS the issue of our time. It's the one thing that everything else hinges on. No other issue matters if we trash our planet to the point where it is barely habitable.

A visionary that needs corrective lenses apparently.

Maybe your right but making inaccurate claims diminishes the credibility of those making the claims. Like this:

https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/08/us/glaciers-national-park-2020-trnd/index.html

So am I supposed to believe every dire prediction made by every dire prediction maker?
 
A visionary that needs corrective lenses apparently.

Maybe your right but making inaccurate claims diminishes the credibility of those making the claims. Like this:

https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/08/us/glaciers-national-park-2020-trnd/index.html

So am I supposed to believe every dire prediction made by every dire prediction maker?

It's a fair question. It's not unlike predictions in any other area - finance, sports, technology. Some will be right, some will be wrong. With the environment, I think a lot of naysayers cherrypick the "wrong" predictions (i.e. that cover story about the 'next ice age' that came out in the '70s).

I look at predictions as being more "on the whole." And on the whole, predictors were fairly right about where we'd be right now. I don't think people realize how different our planet is today than it was just 30 years ago, because a lot of it has been gradual and we've gotten used to how it is now.
 
It's a fair question. It's not unlike predictions in any other area - finance, sports, technology. Some will be right, some will be wrong. With the environment, I think a lot of naysayers cherrypick the "wrong" predictions (i.e. that cover story about the 'next ice age' that came out in the '70s).

I look at predictions as being more "on the whole." And on the whole, predictors were fairly right about where we'd be right now. I don't think people realize how different our planet is today than it was just 30 years ago, because a lot of it has been gradual and we've gotten used to how it is now.

Maybe you're right but people are not trying to make policy decisions based on the predictions in those other areas like they are with climate change. Someone the proposed policies would have a significant impact on economies around the world. And again when they make erroneous predictions its tougher to take any of them seriously.

If the changes are that slow them maybe they aren't man made. The earth has been changing for millions of years. The assumption seems to be that what we have now wil always be. The earth will continue changing no matter what we do.
 
It's a fair question. It's not unlike predictions in any other area - finance, sports, technology. Some will be right, some will be wrong. With the environment, I think a lot of naysayers cherrypick the "wrong" predictions (i.e. that cover story about the 'next ice age' that came out in the '70s).

I look at predictions as being more "on the whole." And on the whole, predictors were fairly right about where we'd be right now. I don't think people realize how different our planet is today than it was just 30 years ago, because a lot of it has been gradual and we've gotten used to how it is now.

What predictions have been right?
 
Well, look at it this way...

It's one of Greta's earliest lies / wrong predictions in what will almost certainly be a long line of lies and wrong predictions about climate change during her career as a radical...
 
Well, look at it this way...

It's one of Greta's earliest lies / wrong predictions in what will almost certainly be a long line of lies and wrong predictions about climate change during her career as a radical...
She was 15, Terry.

7egfq3.jpg
 
She spread misinformation.

She was 15, ExLax. You claim to be a doctor and you spread misinformation about HCQ and Ivermectin that killed your BIL and God knows how many others....including some on this forum.

How many people did the 15 year old Swedish school girl kill, ExLax?
 
Back
Top