Ballroom Derangement Syndrome Now Besets the Pathetic Left

[IBDaMann]

To be fair, they were fancy port-a-potties with hand washing stations.

There is no such thing as "fancy" port-a-potties. There were plenty of those in Afghanistan, and there is nothing luxurious about them.

 

[AProudLefty]

There is no such thing as "fancy" port-a-potties. There were plenty of those in Afghanistan, and there is nothing luxurious about them.

Gold laced port-a-potties.

 

[IBDaMann]

IBDaMoron is a self aggrandizing, third rate troll.

Too funny! Add "troll" to the list of words that @Nomad uses but doesn't know what they mean.

Does anyone know what @Nomad's first language is?

Says dumb shit because he thinks he upsets people.

Too funny! @Nomad thinks his barely discernible cognitive functions can somehow read my mind. You can't make this up.

But the only way he upsets anyone is by making them realize just how fucking stupid some people (trumpers) are capable of being.

Does anyone know if @Nomad was one of the open-border crossers who entered the US under Biden's handlers' administration? His HATRED for the US and his lack of English proficiency makes that sound about right.

 

[IBDaMann]

You mock deaf people.

Nope. You are not a plural, despite your DEI indoctrination. I mock a deaf person. Can you guess who that might be?

I dont hate Trump.

You HATE Trump. You have to write "HATE" in all upper case.

I dont fawn over Trump like you do.

You are repeating yourself. I stipulate that you don't fawn over Trump. You obsess over Trump, 24/7. You may move onto the next point.

 

[AProudLefty]

Too funny! Add "troll" to the list of words that @Nomad uses but doesn't know what they mean.

Does anyone know what @Nomad's first language is?


Too funny! @Nomad thinks his barely discernible cognitive functions can somehow read my mind. You can't make this up.


Does anyone know if @Nomad was one of the open-border crossers who entered the US under Biden's handlers' administration? His HATRED for the US and his lack of English proficiency makes that sound about right.

This troll continues to prove the point. Watch as @gfm7175 and @Into the Night come to his rescue.

 

[AProudLefty]

Nope. You are not a plural, despite your DEI indoctrination.

I am not a transgender.

I mock a deaf person. Can you guess who that might be?

You? Youre mocking yourself.

You HATE Trump. You have to write "HATE" in all upper case.

Nope. Loved him in The Apprentice. YOURE FIRED! All in upper case.

You are repeating yourself. I stipulate that you don't fawn over Trump. You obsess over Trump, 24/7. You may move onto the next point.

Nope. I don't worship the floor Trump walk on.

 

[IBDaMann]

I am not a transgender.

I agree. There is no such thing.

Youre mocking yourself.

Notice how I don't become totally unhinged when you make a typo. You should practice remaining calm and avoiding major meltdowns.

Nope. I don't worship the floor Trump walk on.

Notice how I don't become totally unhinged when you make a typo. You should practice remaining calm and avoiding major meltdowns.

 

[AProudLefty]

I agree. There is no such thing.

So why bring it up?

Notice how I don't become totally unhinged when you make a typo. You should practice remaining calm and avoiding major meltdowns.

This is unhinged.

Notice how I don't become totally unhinged when you make a typo. You should practice remaining calm and avoiding major meltdowns.

Unhinged.

Mirroring tends to do that.

 

[Kurmugeon]

Wanna see?

https://x.com/i/grok/share/yU2kHswWyYYSqsAFPh3RR6F5T

https://x.com/i/grok/share/bWQkZS7qYPWO8zM7UkGkxaMIe

I looked it up. Don't you know how?



Who's "we"?



If only you'd been there to instruct the architects it'd be so much better, right?



Your aesthetic preferences weren't considered, were they, poor thing?

Thank you very much for these links. Koodoos on finding them so quickly.

This action has earned my respect.

-

 

[Earl]

If a brown person eners the US illegally, arrest and deport.

The US does not discriminate by color or race.

 

[Jarod]

No, you just love to bitch.

You love to deflect.

 

[Jarod]

You obsess over Trump 24/7. The fact that Trump is building a ballroom is currently consuming you. You didn't say word one about Obama doing rougly the same thing except with greater cost and the taxpayers footing the bill.

All of your commentary is involuntary TDS-reflex.


No you don't. There is no requirement to consult with Congress if Congress isn't being asked to fund it. You are flailing desperately for things to say. The Constitution specifically gives the President all Executive power, and Trump is renovating the White House, an Executive building, as a personal gift to We the People.

We the People say "Thank you" to Trump and We say "STFU" to you.


You always claim that everything Trump says is a lie. You are a tired, warped, broken record. Give it a rest.


There is no lack of transparency. Karoline Leavitt held a press conference to explain all details, the share the design plans and to answer all questions. Full transparency. You are desperate ... and totally dishonest.

@Donald J. Trump, thank you from We the People. Your thoughtful gift of an Executive ballroom is not only greatly appreciated, it is exactly what the White House has needed for a long time now. Thanks again. Oh, and ignore Jarod, his TDS is flaring up like a pack of hemorrhoids.

There may not be a “requirement” that Congress be consulted, that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be done.

Trump did say the East Wing would not be touched, do you deny that?

Nobody has said who is “donating” money or how much, or what threats were made to get them to “donate” that money.

You are being intentionally obtuse, or you really are that dumb.

 

[Earl]

There may not be a “requirement” that Congress be consulted, that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be done.

Trump did say the East Wing would not be touched, do you deny that?

Nobody has said who is “donating” money or how much, or what threats were made to get them to “donate” that money.

You are being intentionally obtuse, or you really are that dumb.

Diogenes has posted the link that gives the donors and amounts.

If you weren’t so uninformed, you would know this.

Post no. 249… on this page.

Who is being intentionally obtuse, or you really are that dumb?

Good grief.

 

[Damocles]

Would you have lol'd if the project had actually been started and completed during bush's term in office?

What I'm loling about is maga's naive belief that this monstrosity will cost the taxpayers nothing.

It would not have been a good example of how "the right" would act if a leftist President had done some renovations paid for with tax dollars if it had been started and ended during Bush. To be honest I would have probably been more critical considering the tax dollars we were spending.

 

[Damocles]

There is no such thing as "fancy" port-a-potties. There were plenty of those in Afghanistan, and there is nothing luxurious about them.

Congratulations, you've found the irony in my post and "exposed" it.

 

[Jarod]

It would not have been a good example of how "the right" would act if a leftist President had done some renovations paid for with tax dollars if it had been started and ended during Bush. To be honest I would have probably been more critical considering the tax dollars we were spending.

I don’t care specifically that a ballroom is being built…

1) I care that this was done without consultation with Congress.

2) That Trump lied about the destruction of the East wing.

3) That there is a lack of transparency as to who is paying, and what they are getting by doing so.

 

[Jarod]

It would not have been a good example of how "the right" would act if a leftist President had done some renovations paid for with tax dollars if it had been started and ended during Bush. To be honest I would have probably been more critical considering the tax dollars we were spending.

I prefer tax dollars be spent, these companies are not donating this money out of the kindness of their hart.

I assume they are responding to threats from Trump, that is his style.

 

[Damocles]

I don’t care specifically that a ballroom is being built…

1) I care that this was done without consultation with Congress.

2) That Trump lied about the destruction of the East wing.

3) That there is a lack of transparency as to who is paying, and what they are getting by doing so.

1. Presidents do not regularly consult congress about renovations on the White House.
2. Scope creep, not a crime.
3. The "lack of transparency" argument is weak considering we are hearing a list of the companies that have promised money.

I think you are upset because the Orange Man is going to leave a legacy that will be utilized and spoken about for decades, not for any other reason.

 

[Jake Starkey]

...and during the bush administration. Infrastructure is different than a vanity project.

Who says?

 

[Jarod]

1. Presidents do not regularly consult congress about renovations on the White House.
2. Scope creep, not a crime.
3. The "lack of transparency" argument is weak considering we are hearing a list of the companies that have promised money.

I think you are upset because the Orange Man is going to leave a legacy that will be utilized and spoken about for decades, not for any other reason.

1. Not sure that is true, it looks like they usually do.

2. Not a crime, still not ok w me. Is criminality now the bar for presidential behavior?

3. The “list” is incomplete and likely a lie, and, why they donated (if they did) is my question. What are these corporations, with a fiduciary duty to stockholders, getting in exchange? Were they threatened or bullied?