| Tier 1 Status | Yes | Yes |
| Market Value Treatment | 100% of market value | 100% of market value |
| Risk Weighting | 0% risk weighting | 0% risk weighting |
| Institutional Demand | Expected to rise | Expected to rise |
| Market Dynamics | Strengthens balance sheets | Potential for supply shocks |
When was the last time gold lost value, fucktard?Gold prices are very unstable, so make very poor tier one assets. If a bank has 10% of its deposits in gold, and gold loses half its value(very possible, if not likely), it will suddenly need to get 5% more assets.
It goes up and down almost every day. It had a huge crash back in 2013 where it lost a third of its value.When was the last time gold lost value, fucktard?
I can't fix your brand of stupid.
It goes up and down almost every day. It had a huge crash back in 2013 where it lost a third of its value.
Even your own chart says it has not always increased.Yet has it not always been increasing?
Tier 1 assets are not supposed to go up a lot, they are supposed to be extremely stable. Is gold extremely stable?Holy crappo, it's almost at $5k.
bump for the tardy.
tardy for the party.
It goes up and down almost every day. It had a huge crash back in 2013 where it lost a third of its value.
it is nonetheless the top tier asset now. the rule change is real, even if you don't agree, dumb idiot.Gold prices are very unstable, so make very poor tier one assets. If a bank has 10% of its deposits in gold, and gold loses half its value(very possible, if not likely), it will suddenly need to get 5% more assets.
"Top tier" in what sense? A tier 1 asset should be incredibly stable, without making major moves up or down. It should have no reasonable way to crash. The very fact that gold is flying high makes it not a tier 1 asset.it is nonetheless the top tier asset now.
And we will see what it brings us. You say gold cannot possible go down in value, and yet almost every day it does go down in value for at least part of the day.the rule change is real, even if you don't agree, dumb idiot.
They are? Remember it is heads the bankers win, tails the taxpayers lose. This is nothing but good news for them.our bankers are trying to slow walk walk the impact.
Do I think trillions in taxpayer backstops is meaningless? No, I think it has a huge meaning.if you think its meaningless that's just your stupidity.