Prosecutions against Comey and James…

Jarod said:
Jarod said:
Can’t get out of the starting gate, the DOJ revenge teem is ridiculously incompetent.

They couldn’t find a competent attorney who was corrupt enough to do the job.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Trump's DOJ team is loaded with actual talent. Take Lindsey Halligan, sharp as hell, made partner at a solid litigation firm, handled big federal fights, then jumped in as Trump's personal lawyer and absolutely crushed it on the tough cases like Mar-a-Lago. She's the kind of fighter your side is terrified of.

The actual problem? Activist libtard judges bending over backwards to protect their deep-state pals like Comey and James. The Clinton appointee Cameron McGowan Currie tossed the indictments on a very flimsy technicality about the appointment, basically declaring the whole thing unconstitutional to shut it down. She's pulled partisan stunts like that before, always ready to block anything conservative.

And Obama pick James Boasberg? The guy blocking Trump's deportation orders left and right, letting criminals walk while acting like it's all about the law. These judges aren't impartial, they're straight-up political hacks doing whatever it takes to shield leftist scumbags.

It's not our team dropping the ball, it's your rigged judiciary sabotaging real justice at every turn. That's obvious to sane people.

Oh, and Jarod, I know we can't all be expected to know the spelling of complicated words like team, but seriously, try harder.
 
Tobytone said:
Trump's DOJ team is loaded with actual talent. Take Lindsey Halligan, sharp as hell, made partner at a solid litigation firm, handled big federal fights, then jumped in as Trump's personal lawyer and absolutely crushed it on the tough cases like Mar-a-Lago. She's the kind of fighter your side is terrified of.

The actual problem? Activist libtard judges bending over backwards to protect their deep-state pals like Comey and James. The Clinton appointee Cameron McGowan Currie tossed the indictments on a very flimsy technicality about the appointment, basically declaring the whole thing unconstitutional to shut it down. She's pulled partisan stunts like that before, always ready to block anything conservative.

And Obama pick James Boasberg? The guy blocking Trump's deportation orders left and right, letting criminals walk while acting like it's all about the law. These judges aren't impartial, they're straight-up political hacks doing whatever it takes to shield leftist scumbags.

It's not our team dropping the ball, it's your rigged judiciary sabotaging real justice at every turn. That's obvious to sane people.

Oh, and Jarod, I know we can't all be expected to know the spelling of complicated words like team, but seriously, try harder.
Click to expand...
Lindsey Halligan might be talented in civil litigation, that is VERY different than Criminal Prosecution. Different set of rules, Different perspective... I have done both, and I did three years as a state prosecutor. I am in no way qualified to be a head ASA of a division of the Justice Department.

The woman was unable to properly handle an indictment. This is not the Judge's fault. You are blinded into idiocy. The Grand Jury actually never saw the indictment she presented to the Judge, stupid. Halligan was also never properly confirmed by the Congress. She did not have the power to sign an indictment, this is very basic stuff.
 
It is difficult to find a prosecutor who looks like she stepped out of Central Casting to do the corrupt job Trump requires. He wants to use justice to punish people. He even threatens Powell with legal action. Trump is a teenage bully and will be until his last day,
 
Jarod said:
Can’t get out of the starting gate, the DOJ revenge teem is ridiculously incompetent.

They couldn’t find a competent attorney who was corrupt enough to do the job.
Click to expand...
Waaaaaaaaaa sucks doesn't it? Fuck you asshole
 
Jarod said:
Lindsey Halligan might be talented in civil litigation, that is VERY different than Criminal Prosecution. Different set of rules, Different perspective... I have done both, and I did three years as a state prosecutor. I am in no way qualified to be a head ASA of a division of the Justice Department.

The woman was unable to properly handle an indictment. This is not the Judge's fault. You are blinded into idiocy. The Grand Jury actually never saw the indictment she presented to the Judge, stupid. Halligan was also never properly confirmed by the Congress. She did not have the power to sign an indictment, this is very basic stuff.
Click to expand...
If you are a lawyer, it's proof positive of something I've been saying for years. Too many lawyers are complete morons, and it's obvious that the Bar exam is too easy or it's been corrupted so badly that even an idiot like yourself can cheat, lol. I wouldn't hire you to fight a parking ticket. For one, you can't write a sentence as well as the average 7th grader and second, the ideas and arguments you put forward are some of the dumbest on this forum. I'd be surprised if you had an IQ higher than room temperature. I reject the idea that you graduated high school let alone graduated from law school. Your cookie cutter response to my comment is clearly straight from one of the many legal analyst that wrote click-bait articles for suckers like you. Guess what? You bought it and now you're pretending to be a lawyer just to repeat it? lmfao.

If you were an actual lawyer that wanted to explain what actually happened you'd say something like:
Judge Currie dismissed the Comey and James indictments outright, ruling Halligan's appointment unlawful under the Federal vacancies Reform Act despite DOJ precedents for interim roles, and ignored arguments that the grand jury's approval validated the charges. The only reason for this ruling? Protecting anti-Trump figures. There isn't any other possible justification, period. This had zero impact on whether or not the accused would get a fair trial. In fact, if you used the lefts reasoning, they should be happy, an incompetent person was put in charge of prosecuting their heroes. Comey and James should also be thrilled with the 'incompetence' of their prosecutors, right?

These aren't failed prosecutors, they're activist judges sabotaging accountability. The Trump administration did what they and every other administration has done many times without issue, that's how precedent is set. Try again, moron. This isn't difficult. I could list many examples of the precedent, but idiots on the left, don't understand facts, they only know what others tell them to think or play pretend lawyers like Jarod the dunce just tried.
 
Tobytone said:
If you are a lawyer, it's proof positive of something I've been saying for years. Too many lawyers are complete morons, and it's obvious that the Bar exam is too easy or it's been corrupted so badly that even an idiot like yourself can cheat, lol. I wouldn't hire you to fight a parking ticket. For one, you can't write a sentence as well as the average 7th grader and second, the ideas and arguments you put forward are some of the dumbest on this forum. I'd be surprised if you had an IQ higher than room temperature. I reject the idea that you graduated high school let alone graduated from law school. Your cookie cutter response to my comment is clearly straight from one of the many legal analyst that wrote click-bait articles for suckers like you. Guess what? You bought it and now you're pretending to be a lawyer just to repeat it? lmfao.

If you were an actual lawyer that wanted to explain what actually happened you'd say something like:
Judge Currie dismissed the Comey and James indictments outright, ruling Halligan's appointment unlawful under the Federal vacancies Reform Act despite DOJ precedents for interim roles, and ignored arguments that the grand jury's approval validated the charges. The only reason for this ruling? Protecting anti-Trump figures. There isn't any other possible justification, period. This had zero impact on whether or not the accused would get a fair trial. In fact, if you used the lefts reasoning, they should be happy, an incompetent person was put in charge of prosecuting their heroes. Comey and James should also be thrilled with the 'incompetence' of their prosecutors, right?

These aren't failed prosecutors, they're activist judges sabotaging accountability. The Trump administration did what they and every other administration has done many times without issue, that's how precedent is set. Try again, moron. This isn't difficult. I could list many examples of the precedent, but idiots on the left, don't understand facts, they only know what others tell them to think or play pretend lawyers like Jarod the dunce just tried.
Click to expand...
DOJ precedents for interim roles do not supercede the Constitution or federal laws.

These jobs require advice and consent of the Senate, you cannot run around that requirement by appointing someone interim yet without limits. The Law and the Court have found the limit.
 
Jarod said:
DOJ precedents for interim roles do not supercede the Constitution or federal laws.

These jobs require advice and consent of the Senate, you cannot run around that requirement by appointing someone interim yet without limits. The Law and the Court have found the limit.
Click to expand...
As I said, there is more than just a little precedent dumbass. Should I list a few? Why not.

  • Trump first term (2017–2021): AG Sessions appointed multiple interim US Attorneys under § 546 after firing predecessors (e.g., Geoffrey Berman initially in SDNY under § 546, later court-appointed after 120 days); AG appointed 17 current/former prosecutors as interims in 2018 under § 546.
  • Bush era (post-2005 Patriot Act changes, later repealed): AG made successive interim appointments under § 546, including disputes like South Dakota (2005–2006) where AG appointed second interim after first resigned, leading to court challenge (resolved via recess appointment).
  • Obama era: AG Lynch appointed acting/interim US Attorneys (e.g., Donald S. Boyce as acting in Southern District of Illinois 2016 under FVRA/§ 546 combo, later court-extended).
  • Recent Trump second term parallels: AG appointments like Alina Habba (NJ) and John Sarcone (NDNY) used similar maneuvers—designating as special attorney/first assistant then invoking FVRA after § 546 limits, though challenged (e.g., courts ruled against multiple successive § 546 120-day resets in some cases).
If you weren't a mouth-breathing moron, you'd realize this is standard political bias horseshit, a blatant delay tactic that is already bleeding the two defendants dry on legal fees. The judge is likely getting greased or if they're lucky she's a true-blue full-blown TDS infected hack that did it for free.

In reality, it's just a stall. We'll see those two scumbags back in court defending their crimes sometime next year unless they cough up even more cash to drag it out another year by forcing fresh charges if the Fourth Circuit appeal flops.

This is how the big boys play: the only real winners are the lawyers bleeding the defendants dry. The longer this drags on, the more they'll bleed. Part of me wants swift justice, but another part wants it to crawl on for years while it costs them millions, even if it means the greasy lawyers get fatter in the process.
 
Tobytone said:
As I said, there is more than just a little precedent dumbass. Should I list a few? Why not.

  • Trump first term (2017–2021): AG Sessions appointed multiple interim US Attorneys under § 546 after firing predecessors (e.g., Geoffrey Berman initially in SDNY under § 546, later court-appointed after 120 days); AG appointed 17 current/former prosecutors as interims in 2018 under § 546.
  • Bush era (post-2005 Patriot Act changes, later repealed): AG made successive interim appointments under § 546, including disputes like South Dakota (2005–2006) where AG appointed second interim after first resigned, leading to court challenge (resolved via recess appointment).
  • Obama era: AG Lynch appointed acting/interim US Attorneys (e.g., Donald S. Boyce as acting in Southern District of Illinois 2016 under FVRA/§ 546 combo, later court-extended).
  • Recent Trump second term parallels: AG appointments like Alina Habba (NJ) and John Sarcone (NDNY) used similar maneuvers—designating as special attorney/first assistant then invoking FVRA after § 546 limits, though challenged (e.g., courts ruled against multiple successive § 546 120-day resets in some cases).
If you weren't a mouth-breathing moron, you'd realize this is standard political bias horseshit, a blatant delay tactic that is already bleeding the two defendants dry on legal fees. The judge is likely getting greased or if they're lucky she's a true-blue full-blown TDS infected hack that did it for free.

In reality, it's just a stall. We'll see those two scumbags back in court defending their crimes sometime next year unless they cough up even more cash to drag it out another year by forcing fresh charges if the Fourth Circuit appeal flops.

This is how the big boys play: the only real winners are the lawyers bleeding the defendants dry. The longer this drags on, the more they'll bleed. Part of me wants swift justice, but another part wants it to crawl on for years while it costs them millions, even if it means the greasy lawyers get fatter in the process.
Click to expand...
None of your precedents are particularly significant because they are not substantially the same. Different offices… and different amounts of time.

None of your “precedent” has been reviewed by the court so it’s NOT, legal precedent. Even if it were the same thing that was done in the past…. That doesn’t mean it was Constitutional. The Courts are only now weighing in.
 
Tobytone said:
Trump's DOJ team is loaded with actual talent. Take Lindsey Halligan, sharp as hell, made partner at a solid litigation firm, handled big federal fights, then jumped in as Trump's personal lawyer and absolutely crushed it on the tough cases like Mar-a-Lago. She's the kind of fighter your side is terrified of.

The actual problem? Activist libtard judges bending over backwards to protect their deep-state pals like Comey and James. The Clinton appointee Cameron McGowan Currie tossed the indictments on a very flimsy technicality about the appointment, basically declaring the whole thing unconstitutional to shut it down. She's pulled partisan stunts like that before, always ready to block anything conservative.

And Obama pick James Boasberg? The guy blocking Trump's deportation orders left and right, letting criminals walk while acting like it's all about the law. These judges aren't impartial, they're straight-up political hacks doing whatever it takes to shield leftist scumbags.

It's not our team dropping the ball, it's your rigged judiciary sabotaging real justice at every turn. That's obvious to sane people.

Oh, and Jarod, I know we can't all be expected to know the spelling of complicated words like team, but seriously, try harder.
Click to expand...
Crazy Trump's gestapo DOJ you mean
 
Jarod said:
Can’t get out of the starting gate, the DOJ revenge teem is ridiculously incompetent.

They couldn’t find a competent attorney who was corrupt enough to do the job.
Click to expand...
Nobody halfway competent wants to work for tRump. He ruins their careers.
 
Jarod said:
None of your precedents are particularly significant because they are not substantially the same. Different offices… and different amounts of time.

None of your “precedent” has been reviewed by the court so it’s NOT, legal precedent. Even if it were the same thing that was done in the past…. That doesn’t mean it was Constitutional. The Courts are only now weighing in.
Click to expand...
No shit, you can't quite get your AI to lie for you, huh? LOL I knew that as soon as one knuckle dragging idiot starting using AI, the rest would follow. As I told Number Six, AI won't make you smarter, just the opposite. Your dumbass reply proves the point. 'None of your 'precedent' has been reviewed......' lol I listed them because they are exactly the kind of cases used as precedent as the courts weigh in, dumbass. If you're going to keep using AI, you have to learn what questions to ask. Unfortunately for you, a brain is needed to ask the right questions. Bummer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top