Some of the illegals arrested by ICE in Minnesota

They're fascist, hateful fucks all. Terry included now, unfortunately.
Agreed.

IMO, from a psychological perspective, they hate their lives but are too weak to do anything about it so they spend all day spreading hate and blame on others. Typically against "Leftist, Marxist, socialist fucking bitches who deserve to be shot".
 
Strawman. They are defending the innocents, not violent criminals.
No, they're not. They're defending criminals. By definition someone who is illegally in the US is a criminal. They aren't here legally. The level of criminality may be minor or extremely serious, but they are criminals.

And it isn't just illegal entry. If they have a job using a false social security number that's two more crimes. If they are not paying taxes and working under the table, that's a crime.

That's who the Left is defending, CRIMINALS.
 
No, they're not. They're defending criminals. By definition someone who is illegally in the US is a criminal. They aren't here legally. The level of criminality may be minor or extremely serious, but they are criminals.

And it isn't just illegal entry. If they have a job using a false social security number that's two more crimes. If they are not paying taxes and working under the table, that's a crime.

That's who the Left is defending, CRIMINALS.
I forgive your treason because I truly believe you are a lonely, demented and divorced geezer with nothing more to look forward to except a lonely death.

How else to explain the behavior and thought processes of a retired Navy Chief who supported the violent attack on our Capitol and continues to defend the actions of Ashli Babbitt and the others who spent hours attacking police on 1/6?

7tcprn.gif
 
Hyperbole much, T. A.?

Many of us on the left want to see this disgusting president and the goons of his ICE squads constrained a bit. That does not mean that we want killers and rapers to be allowed to rape, pillage and kill. And if your brain were working properly, you would see that and not resort to hyperbole to attempt to make points that you normally miss by miles.
What's "constrained a bit?" My bet is those are just weasel words to try and cover for your supporting criminals over the law abiding.
 
The 1A guarantees our right to protest. You actually think it's ok to murder people just for the "crime" of just disagreeing with your disgusting, evil ass.
No one was "murder(ed)... ...just for the "crime" of just disagreeing." It is not a First Amendment Right to protest by interfering with law enforcement or the government in the lawful carrying out of the law in the slightest degree.
 
Last edited:
What's "constrained a bit?" My bet is those are just weasel words to try and cover for your supporting criminals over the law abiding.
If you want to make stupid bets...fine with me.

You are just too deluded by your Fuhrer to understand,

But if your side "wins"...my guess is that you will soon regret what you helped happenl.
 
If you want to make stupid bets...fine with me.

You are just too deluded by your Fuhrer to understand,

But if your side "wins"...my guess is that you will soon regret what you helped happenl.
As usual a reasonable question for more detail is met with insults and ad hominem, and in this case veiled threats, by the Leftist that it was posed to. Telling that you can't defend your own position beyond vague generalities.
 
No one was "murder(ed)" "just for the "crime" of just disagreeing." It is not a First Amendment Right to protest by interfering with law enforcement or the government in the lawful carrying out of the law in the slightest degree.

Blocking roadways is not a First Amendment right either. What if an emergency vehicle needs to get through? Would it be OK for someone to die because an ambulance can't get to a victim? These idiot leftards don't think about anyone but themselves.
 
As usual a reasonable question for more detail is met with insults and ad hominem, and in this case veiled threats, by the Leftist that it was posed to. Telling that you can't defend your own position beyond vague generalities.
If you think my response was "telling" in any way...fine with me.

Not only are you free to make stupid bets...you are also free to "think" I am evading answering a silly question. AT LEAST FOR NOW. If your side "wins"...none of us will be free to do that.
 
Blocking roadways is not a First Amendment right either. What if an emergency vehicle needs to get through? Would it be OK for someone to die because an ambulance can't get to a victim? These idiot leftards don't think about anyone but themselves.
I am now of the opinion that those of you on the right...DO NOT THINK AT ALL.
 
Show me where I did that, because I didn't. The only distinction I've made is saying they were rioters / protesters and not "insurrectionists." That isn't "support."
Are you denying you haven't supported the attack on the Capitol and continually attack Lt. Byrd, the black cop, who shot a white woman terrorist, Terry? The fact you now support the shooting of Renee Good is the oddity. The flip-flop that proves you are a MAGAt anti-American and traitor.
 
Are you denying you haven't supported the attack on the Capitol and continually attack Lt. Byrd, the black cop, who shot a white woman terrorist, Terry? The fact you now support the shooting of Renee Good is the oddity. The flip-flop that proves you are a MAGAt anti-American and traitor.
Complex question fallacy. I don't support the Jan 6 riot or rioters. I can at the same time say the actions of Lt. Byrd were those of an incompetent coward and likely resulted in a criminal death at his hands.

I can, at the same time, say that Good's shooting was a reasonable action by a law enforcement officer.

Your use of a complex question followed by a fallacy fallacy proves only that you're an idiot, something we already knew.
 
Back
Top