GOP Is Struggling To Give 'Malaria' Tickets Away

Or you could put them in NSFW like a normal human and we wouldn't have an issue.
Over 740 "Mr. Tiny Penis" comments without a single concern expressed by you about office decorum. I post a man with hand lotion on his face and I'm threatened with banning. Weird!

Be honest, Damo: why does your alter-ego @Lionfish the Snitch Bitch get a free pass on everything?
 
The reports are that GOP organizations are buying blocks of tickets to boost the reputation of 'Malaria the Movie'

The lesson here is that Republicans do not believe in free market capitalism.
It's also highly probable that some of that money is making its way back into the Pedo President's pockets.
 
Over 740 "Mr. Tiny Penis" comments without a single concern expressed by you about office decorum. I post a man with hand lotion on his face and I'm threatened with banning. Weird!

Be honest, Damo: why does your alter-ego @Lionfish the Snitch Bitch get a free pass on everything?
Mr. Tiny Penis isn't "porn", you know it so much that you regularly write about it with no consequences. Stop your whining, put bukkake images in NSFW and move on you whinger...

I get that you are a bit embarrassed that someone called you out on how much you love to describe the images to your favorite AI and get jazzed up posting them. But now, like other big boys, you get to put your favorite images into NSFW so that images like that are not on my screen while I am at work.

It's a win-win. You get to keep getting off describing your favorite imaginary scenes, and we get to avoid them should we want to.
 
The movie had a great opening thanks to MAGA obeisance. Now watch it sink.

The only audience I can see that bit of poorly-done propaganda appealing to is subservient MAGAT females. MAGAT males like movies with sex, nudity, explosions, guns, action. I guess a typical desperate-to-get-laid MAGAT boy would take a MAGAT girl to see it in hopes of scoring later, but that's about it for appeal. lol
 
Over 740 "Mr. Tiny Penis" comments without a single concern expressed by you about office decorum. I post a man with hand lotion on his face and I'm threatened with banning. Weird!

Be honest, Damo: why does your alter-ego @Lionfish the Snitch Bitch get a free pass on everything?

Dear Mr. Tiny Penis,

I will put this in large font so one of your "buddies' can cut and paste it in a DM for you.

It was YOU who found yourself in another forced ignore position, not me or anyone else.

Next time, if you are lucky enough to have one,

1. Don't announce to everyone that you are sending out multiple pictures of your dick and then actually do it.
2. Listen when the moderators warn you multiple times to knock off your inappropriate behavior or suffer the consequences that you have brought upon yourself.

3. Stop blaming everyone/anyone else for your own stupidity.
 
The only audience I can see that bit of poorly-done propaganda appealing to is subservient MAGAT females. MAGAT males like movies with sex, nudity, explosions, guns, action. I guess a typical desperate-to-get-laid MAGAT boy would take a MAGAT girl to see it in hopes of scoring later, but that's about it for appeal. lol
Real men love them some chainsaw movies.
:magagrin:
 
Mr. Tiny Penis isn't "porn", you know it so much that you regularly write about it with no consequences. Stop your whining, put bukkake images in NSFW and move on you whinger...

I get that you are a bit embarrassed that someone called you out on how much you love to describe the images to your favorite AI and get jazzed up posting them. But now, like other big boys, you get to put your favorite images into NSFW so that images like that are not on my screen while I am at work.

It's a win-win. You get to keep getting off describing your favorite imaginary scenes, and we get to avoid them should we want to.
Agreed. The difference is that you believe anything that impugns your dear, dear friend is "porn" while nothing s/he does is porn.

To add your bias is that fact that, up to now, Forced Ignore (an anti-Libertarian action in itself) was always mutual. Now there's proof that you, once again, have protected your dear, dear friend, @Lionfish the Penis-Lover AKA Legina the Snitch Bitch, but blocking me from seeing his posts but allowing him to see my posts. Why the bias, Damo? Why the special treatment for Legina?

How can you honestly claim to be a Buddhist and a Libertarian when you are so dishonest in your behavior?

1770212435040.png
 
Agreed. The difference is that you believe anything that impugns your dear, dear friend is "porn" while nothing s/he does is porn.

To add your bias is that fact that, up to now, Forced Ignore, an anti-Libertarian action, was always mutual. Now there's proof that you, once again, have protected your dear, dear friend, @Lionfish the Penis-Lover AKA Legina the Snitch Bitch, but blocking me from seeing his posts but allowing him to see my posts. Why the bias, Damo? Why the special treatment for Legina?

How can you honestly claim to be a Buddhist and a Libertarian when you are so dishonest in your behavior?

View attachment 73278
You are the issue. You get the forced ignore. It was either this or ban you and I didn't want to ban you.

Also, this one was done by a vote. At least 2 mods agreed that this was the correct action to take.
 
Agreed. The difference is that you believe anything that impugns your dear, dear friend is "porn" while nothing s/he does is porn.

To add your bias is that fact that, up to now, Forced Ignore (an anti-Libertarian action in itself) was always mutual. Now there's proof that you, once again, have protected your dear, dear friend, @Lionfish the Penis-Lover AKA Legina the Snitch Bitch, but blocking me from seeing his posts but allowing him to see my posts. Why the bias, Damo? Why the special treatment for Legina?

How can you honestly claim to be a Buddhist and a Libertarian when you are so dishonest in your behavior?

View attachment 73278
Dear Mr. Tiny Penis,

I will put this in large font so one of your "buddies' can cut and paste it in a DM for you.

It was YOU who found yourself in another forced ignore position, not me or anyone else.

Next time, if you are lucky enough to have one,

1. Don't announce to everyone that you are sending out multiple pictures of your dick and then actually do it.
2. Listen when the moderators warn you multiple times to knock off your inappropriate behavior or suffer the consequences that you have brought upon yourself.

3. Stop blaming everyone/anyone else for your own stupidity.
 
The reports are that GOP organizations are buying blocks of tickets to boost the reputation of 'Malaria the Movie'

The lesson here is that Republicans do not believe in free market capitalism.
Quite the opposite. Purchasing thousands of tickets is capitalistic. Theaters benefit, investors benefit, and the pshchartists that the flefties are flocking to over this movie's success are making a fortune. We can also include big pharma, which has been pumping out the anxiety and anti depression pills you alt lefties eat by the handfuls.

BTW, you don't understand the fact this flick is just another Trump troll, which makes it even more delicious.
 
You are the issue. You get the forced ignore. It was either this or ban you and I didn't want to ban you.

Also, this one was done by a vote. At least 2 mods agreed that this was the correct action to take.
I've seen the tactic before; shutting a person's access off until they leave. It's a Pontius Pilate act to wash your hands of something you are responsble for doing.
 
You are the issue. You get the forced ignore. It was either this or ban you and I didn't want to ban you.
What would you have banned me for, Damo? Pissing off your dear, dear friend @Lionfish the Snitch Bitch? Being better and smarter at memes and trolling than Legina? Posting pictures of men with hand lotion on their faces?

I'm truly curious so that, when you do ban me, I'll have the facts in hand when I go elsewhere, including Twitter. LOL

 
I've seen the tactic before; shutting a person's access off until they leave. It's a Pontius Pilate act to wash your hands of something you are responsble for doing.
Sure. One step before the "crucifixion"... Comparing yourself to Christ, you and Trump have more in common than we thought.
 
What would you have banned me for, Damo? Pissing off your dear, dear friend @Lionfish the Snitch Bitch? Being better and smarter at memes and trolling than Legina? Posting pictures of men with hand lotion on their faces?

I'm truly curious so that, when you do ban me, I'll have the facts in hand when I go elsewhere, including Twitter. LOL

Rule 14, if I were wont to ban I would have used that rule.
 
Sure. One step before the "crucifixion"... Comparing yourself to Christ, you and Trump have more in common than we thought.
Nawww, just comparing you to Pontius Pilate who says one thing but the results are clear. However, thanks for the promotion!

Since you are an avowed Buddhist, where does Jesus fit on your measure against the Orange Jesus? I'm guessing one step down since you obviously put MAGA values above Christian values. You know, "Might makes Right", "Trump is above the law", "Cheating is okay as long as you win", etc.
 
Nawww, just comparing you to Pontius Pilate who says one thing but the results are clear. However, thanks for the promotion!

Since you are an avowed Buddhist, where does Jesus fit on your measure against the Orange Jesus? I'm guessing one step down since you obviously put MAGA values above Christian values. You know, "Might makes Right", "Trump is above the law", "Cheating is okay as long as you win", etc.
lol. You compared yourself to Christ... and we all saw it. You and Trump, together in one thing... You both know what it feels like to be almost crucified, you, Trump and Christ... Sympatico....

Geebus. You do entertain.
 
Rule 14, if I were wont to ban I would have used that rule.
740 "Mr. Tiny Penis" comments by your dear, dear friend @Lionfish the Snitch Bitch isn't Rule 14 much less Rule 12C, but you claim I'm guilty of both? Weird.

I actually participate in several intellectual and friendly discussion on JPP. Feel free to ask @AProudLefty@christiefan915 @Cypress @Guno צְבִי @Jade Dragon @Crepitus @LurchAddams @Number Six @ThatOwlWoman@Walt, your own mods @leaningright and @Phantasmal or I can provide links to multiple intellectual conversations on JPP in January alone.

Can your dear, dear friend @Lionfish the Snitch Bitch point out a single intellectual conversation where they were an active participant and not a troll? Damo, if anyone is guilty of violating Rule #14, it's your alter-ego Legina.

You'll trump up a charge and ban me since that's what you've threatened to do, but all JPP members should know it's a biased and wholly fraudulent contrivance since, as you've done with the Forced Ignore, you will be punishing me for something you let your friends get away with doing.

12(c) - Language that is sexually violent (e.g. rape/incest/graphic sex details that simply go 'too far') and/or is used in a manner to harass other users may be removed at moderator discretion without notice or apology, and could end up resulting in a ban if we get tired of repeatedly having to edit posts made by the same individuals over and over.

14. The treatment of Incendiary Troll accounts.
Definition: Posting solely for reaction, to harass, or stalk. Whether single or secondary, those accounts posting solely for reaction and/or harassment and not contributing to the discussion in any way post at the sole discretion of the JPP Admin Team and may be removed at any moment.
 
Back
Top