Let's see: They are wheeled or tracked on land for the most part. Walkers are experimental still. On sea they are fast small boats. In the air they are conventional aircraft using either a prop / piston or jet engine for propulsion. They are in conventional and less conventional aerodynamic shapes, but nothing really new or that hasn't been tried before.
Old, meet new. SSDD.
Any drone body could be fitted with some set of electronics. All you need is the internal volume. Many drones get electronics swapped out depending on the mission they are serving. The electronics ARE separate from the drone.
A Boeing 737 built in 1966 is not very different from one built in 2026, 60 years later in terms of the airframe. Sure, there are incremental improvements, different engines, and very much updated electronics, but either is still the same basic airframe. You could take a 737-100 and update it to a near equivalent of a 737 MAX 7 with little more than an engine swap and new electronics and avionics.
But you clearly don't get it. Iran is already finding their drones and ballistic missiles rarely getting through defense systems across the Middle East. Sure, a few leak through, but it's a tiny fraction of the whole.
Early tanks didn't have grand impact. In WW 1 they were quickly countered with both existing weapons and new specific antitank ones. The French and British didn't change their tactics. The Germans changed their tactics with the use of
stroßtruppen tactics and nearly won that war during the 1918 Kaiser's offensives.
Maybe you should actually study WW 1 tank actions. I recommend
The Fighting Tanks 1916-1933 by Jones, Rarey, and Icks. Tanks never scored the major breakthrough of enemy lines predicted.
And I'm 100% correct. It is you're myopic, amateurish view gotten from watching too much BS-NOW and CNN.
