Trump causes inflation to surge to 3.8%, its highest in three years

...cleanup on aisle four...
Grim Reaper said:
FACT CHECK: “Argument from randU fallacy. There is no data for that period. NBC is just making it up.”
Click to expand...
There is no such thing as a 'fact check'. Buzzword fallacy. Go learn what 'fact' means.
Grim Reaper said:
1. “There is no data for that period.”
False.

The April inflation report does exist, and it was published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) — the federal agency that produces the Consumer Price Index (CPI). NBC was reporting on official government data, not inventing numbers.
Click to expand...
Argument from randU fallacy. Redefinition fallacy (BLS<->M2, NBC<->government, currency<->government agency).

Random numbers are not data, Zombie. The Bureau of Labor Statistics does not monitor inflation or cause it. Buzzword fallacy (Consumer Price Index).

False authority fallacy.
 
Walt said:
The Bureau of Labor Statistics released the inflation rate of 3.8%. I doubt they are making up the number, but if they are that is on trump, not NBC. Basically, you are in denial.
Click to expand...
They are making up numbers, Wally. Argument from randU fallacy. Trump is not a government agency or NBC.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
You don't accept any such source as evidenced by your refusal to accept BLS numbers. Ergo:
Click to expand...
Correct. They are random numbers.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Argument from randU fallacy.
Random numbers are not data.
Click to expand...
Inversion fallacy.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
I see you have now started using a definition you claimed didn't exist. You are too funny with your ignorance and inability to be consistent in your positions.
Click to expand...
False authority fallacy. Redefinition fallacy (inflation<->government agency). Inversion fallacy.
 
Into the Night said:
...cleanup on aisle four...

There is no such thing as a 'fact check'. Buzzword fallacy. Go learn what 'fact' means.

Argument from randU fallacy. Redefinition fallacy (BLS<->M2, NBC<->government, currency<->government agency).

Random numbers are not data, Zombie. The Bureau of Labor Statistics does not monitor inflation or cause it. Buzzword fallacy (Consumer Price Index).

False authority fallacy.
Click to expand...
Cleanup on aisle four’? Sweetheart, the only thing spilling is your brain trying to escape the nonsense you keep typing.

You yelled ‘NO DATA EXISTS,’ got shown the data, and your comeback was to declare reality random numbers. That’s not an argument, that’s a toddler knocking over the chessboard because they don’t know how the pieces move.

You keep inventing fake fallacies like you’re speed‑running a glossary for people who failed Logic 101. randU fallacy? Please. That’s not a fallacy, that’s a cry for help wearing a trench coat.

You’re not debunking anything. You’re just allergic to evidence and breaking out in hives every time someone posts a source.
 
Grim Reaper said:
The claim is not supported by any Federal Reserve or BLS data. There is no evidence that the dollar was “devalued by 52% under Obama/Biden,” “37% under Biden/Obama,” or “only 6% under Trump.” These numbers do not appear in any Federal Reserve dataset, CPI series, or purchasing‑power metrics.
Click to expand...
Lie. Denial.
Grim Reaper said:
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Consumer Price Index - U.S. Bureau of Labor Statisticshttps://www.bls.gov/cpi/data.htm
Click to expand...
False authority fallacy. Argument from randU fallacy.
 
Into the Night said:
Argument from randU fallacy.
Click to expand...

✅ “Argument from randU fallacy.”​

Verdict: Not real. There is no such thing as an Argument from randU fallacy in logic, rhetoric, debate theory, or any academic catalog of fallacies.

Not in:

  • formal logic
  • philosophy
  • cognitive‑bias literature
  • debate handbooks
  • statistical methodology
It’s a fabricated term, used only by people who panic when real data contradicts their beliefs.
 
Ah, the fallacy clown slipped out of the mental hospital again, still wearing the paper wristband and shouting imaginary fallacies at strangers like it’s visiting hours.

Every time he types, you can practically hear the orderly sprinting down the hall yelling, Sir, get back in your room, those fallacies aren’t real!
 
Tbird19482 said:
And when ALL of the BBB takes effect AFTER the mid terms we will watch them cry like babies.
Click to expand...
The BBB is already in effect, Tball, and I'm glad it is. The only ones crying are Democrats like you.
Tbird19482 said:
As I asked before why didn't the republicans want it to go into effect right away if it is as good as they say?
Click to expand...
It's already in effect, Tball.
Tbird19482 said:
If you have tried to read it it is one hell of a mess, there are hundreds of changes in the first few pages it takes an army of lawyers to try and a mean TRY to figure it all out.
Click to expand...
I already know you can't read very well, Tball.
Tbird19482 said:
Heck some of them in the southern red states have already started to fell the effects and have already started crying about the cuts in medicare and medicaid.
Click to expand...
Yup. Democrats are already crying about it.
Illegal immigrants are no longer going to receive Medicare or Medicaid.
 
Grim Reaper said:
Cleanup on aisle four’? Sweetheart, the only thing spilling is your brain trying to escape the nonsense you keep typing.

You yelled ‘NO DATA EXISTS,’ got shown the data, and your comeback was to declare reality random numbers. That’s not an argument, that’s a toddler knocking over the chessboard because they don’t know how the pieces move.

You keep inventing fake fallacies like you’re speed‑running a glossary for people who failed Logic 101. randU fallacy? Please. That’s not a fallacy, that’s a cry for help wearing a trench coat.

You’re not debunking anything. You’re just allergic to evidence and breaking out in hives every time someone posts a source.
Click to expand...
Argument of the Stone fallacy. Inversion fallacy. Argument from randU fallacy. Denial of logic. Assumption of victory fallacy. False authority fallacy. Attempted proof by false authority.
 
Grim Reaper said:
...cleanup on aisle four...
“Argument from randU fallacy.”
Verdict:Not real. There is no such thing as an Argument from randU fallacy in logic, rhetoric, debate theory, or any academic catalog of fallacies.

Not in:

  • formal logic
  • philosophy
  • cognitive‑bias literature
  • debate handbooks
  • statistical methodology
It’s a fabricated term, used only by people who panic when real data contradicts their beliefs.
Click to expand...
Denial of logic. Buzzword fallacies (academic catalog, philosophy, cognitive-bias literature, debate, handbook, statistical methodology).
Denial of mathematics (statistical math).

You can't make your fallacies just disappear, Zombie. AI slop won't help you.
 
Grim Reaper said:
Ah, the fallacy clown slipped out of the mental hospital again, still wearing the paper wristband and shouting imaginary fallacies at strangers like it’s visiting hours.

Every time he types, you can practically hear the orderly sprinting down the hall yelling, Sir, get back in your room, those fallacies aren’t real!
Click to expand...
Mantra 1d. Lame. Denial of logic. You can't make your fallacies just disappear, Zombie.
 
Grim Reaper said:
Ah, the fallacy clown slipped out of the mental hospital again, still wearing the paper wristband and shouting imaginary fallacies at strangers like it’s visiting hours.

Every time he types, you can practically hear the orderly sprinting down the hall yelling, Sir, get back in your room, those fallacies aren’t real!
Click to expand...
Into the Scum is back with his blatant stupidity, unfortunately.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top