No one to vote for. Trump has betrayed my trust. What options do I have now?

America is not in a war.
Good lord. Can you even hear yourself, Trumptard? "We're not at war". Missiles and drones are going off all over the mid-East - some fired by us just recently. Hormuz is closed, strangling the world's economy. We're in a WAR. Quit being such a moron!
Prices will be lower in short order time.
When, "Nostradamus". And tell us how much Tariffs "brought back manufacturing" you loser!
He deports all of biden's illegals once they're found in hiding.
"Biden's illegals". You have the mind of a small child.
 
Overview
President Biden's border policy shifted from initially reversing Trump-era restrictions to implementing highly restrictive measures as border crossings hit historic highs. The administration relied heavily on enforcement, detention, and targeted legal pathways, ultimately enforcing a near-ban on asylum claims during periods of high unauthorized crossings.
Key components of his approach included:
  • Asylum Restrictions: In mid-2024, the administration issued a sweeping proclamation that temporarily suspended the right to seek asylum for migrants crossing the southern border illegally. The policy mandated that border patrol immediately turn away migrants when daily border crossings exceeded an average of 2,500 encounters per week.
  • Targeted Legal Pathways: To manage surges and promote orderly migration, the administration expanded humanitarian parole programs. This included allowing up to 30,000 migrants per month from specific countries (such as Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela) to legally fly into the US if they had established financial sponsors and utilized the CBP One App for appointments.
  • Enforcement & Removals: The administration increased deportation flights, tripled interior detention, and heavily relied on rapid removal processes to deter illegal crossings.
  • Reversal of Early Policies: Early in his term, Biden halted border wall construction and attempted to end the "Remain in Mexico" and Title 42 public health expulsion policies. However, these efforts faced prolonged legal battles and necessitated complex adjustments to border processing over his term.




Here’s some basic info on the Biden policy


So you can see now how it’s an outright lie to call it an open border policy
 
You call It an open border policy because fox told you to call it that


Yet again you were lied to

Given the facts

And now react how ?

This is your chance to get in line with the facts


We know you wont
 
Argument from randU fallacy.
You don't even know what the crap you spew means.


The "RANDU fallacy" refers to the false assumption that a computer-generated sequence of numbers is truly random just because the algorithm produces a uniform distribution. It stems from the infamous RANDU algorithm, a pseudorandom number generator widely deployed on IBM mainframes in the 1960s
 
He never promised that. Can't you people ever be honest?
Did you watch any of his campaign speeches? He promised “no new wars” on many occasions. He used those exact words.

Executive summary

Donald Trump explicitly promised during his campaigns and after his 2024 victory that he would not start new wars — phrases like “I’m not going to start wars,” “no new wars,” and pledges to end “endless” wars were central to his pitch.
 
Did you watch any of his campaign speeches? He promised “no new wars” on many occasions. He used those exact words.

Executive summary

Donald Trump explicitly promised during his campaigns and after his 2024 victory that he would not start new wars — phrases like “I’m not going to start wars,” “no new wars,” and pledges to end “endless” wars were central to his pitch <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...aign-endless-wars-iran-no-end-date-rcna261323" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">[1]</a> <a href="https://www.vanityfair.com/news/story/donald-trump-peace-president" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">[2]</a>. Yet reporting from multiple outlets says that within his current term he has ordered strikes and a major military operation against Iran and other actions critics characterize as new wars, creating a clear divergence between pledge and practice <a href="https://www.npr.org/transcripts/nx-s1-5733999" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">[3]</a> <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...aign-endless-wars-iran-no-end-date-rcna261323" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">[1]</a> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/comment...-now-hes-a-bush-style-regime-change-president" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">[4]</a>.

What @countryboy is arguing is that the US has an old and historical grievance against Cube, and thus this is the finishing of an old war and not a 'new war'.

By that logic what he is saying is that Trump on the campaign trail when saying 'Kamila will get the US into wars and i, Trump will not' actually meant, 'I Trump will go around the world and restart and finish all the historical unfinished wars (Venezuela, Cuba, Iran, etc), and Kamila will not do that. She will not fight those wars. So as the anti-War candidate, vote for me Trump'.

If that sounds absurd, it is because it is but that is exactly what countryboy is arguing. That Kamila would have been weak and not re-started and finished all the US historical wars, and that he Trump would re-start them all and have the US fight them all... as the candidate who would not take the US to war'.
 
Did you watch any of his campaign speeches? He promised “no new wars” on many occasions. He used those exact words.

Executive summary

Donald Trump explicitly promised during his campaigns and after his 2024 victory that he would not start new wars — phrases like “I’m not going to start wars,” “no new wars,” and pledges to end “endless” wars were central to his pitch.
You people always have to play this game of partial quotes and dead links. It's obvious why you do this, because you are trying to obfuscate and deflect. Why is your link not hot?
 
You people always have to play this game of partial quotes and dead links. It's obvious why you do this, because you are trying to obfuscate and deflect. Why is your link not hot?
Contextomy fallacies, Stone fallacies, insult fallacies, and inversion fallacies are the bread and butter of a Democrat.

They don't quote people. They take snippets out of context and call that a 'quote'.
They deny, deny, deny. They deny even recent history.
They blame what they are on conservatives and Trump.
They spend their time just throwing insults and have no topic, no conversation, and no argument to go with it.
Some waste hours and hours doing nothing but downvoting people that disagree with them, as if it made any difference.

He won't produce a link of anything but one of these. He will link only to propaganda, if he links at all. Democrats consider such Holy Links (if provided at all) to be a proof.

Then, of course, they blame you for doing the same thing (inversion fallacy).
 
Good lord. Can you even hear yourself, Trumptard? "We're not at war". Missiles and drones are going off all over the mid-East - some fired by us just recently. Hormuz is closed, strangling the world's economy. We're in a WAR. Quit being such a moron!
Okay, Stooge. If you want to call it a war, call it a war. It makes no difference. You are a nothing.
When, "Nostradamus". And tell us how much Tariffs "brought back manufacturing" you loser!
Guess you haven't been paying attention, like usual.
"Biden's illegals". You have the mind of a small child.
Now you deny now many illegal aliens were brought in by Biden??

That's an act of treason, Stooge.
 
Back
Top