The PP says the US is giving 10 Billion to his Board of Peace...

No, Congress has not approved $10 billion for the Board of Peace.
Lie. Denial.
Because congressional approval is still lacking
Already approved.
and international donors have withheld expected contributions, the board's official World Bank-administered fund is currently sitting entirely empty.
Irrelevant.
Though the State Department has tentatively floated reallocating roughly $1.2 billion from existing aid programs to support regional projects, congressional aides have clarified that none of those funds are being directly managed or disbursed by Trump's Board of Peace.
Irrelevant.
 
Lie. Denial. Already approved. Irrelevant. Irrelevant.

Lies. Denial.


The fund’s official account is empty


Trump has previously pledged $10 billion in taxpayer money to his slush fund. The State Department has offered $50 million to keep the board running, which has yet to be allocated.

The State Department has also promised to reallocate $1.2 billion in aid spending to the Board of Peace’s myriad projects, but apparently that money isn’t headed for the board at all.

“None of that money [has gone to the board]. None of that money is being managed by the Board of Peace. And State tells us there’s no intent to have any of that money managed by the Board of Peace,” one congressional aide told the FT.


 
@Into the Night, Bless your heart.

You’ve now posted “Already appropriated, Pretender,” “It has already been approved, moron,” and your signature gourmet word salad about a magical “contextomy fallacy”… and still not a single bill number, Public Law, Congressional Record page, vote tally, or even a screenshot of the appropriations text.

Zero.

Zilch.

Nada. The intellectual equivalent of “trust me bro, the check’s in the mail.”

Meanwhile, reality is laughing at you:
  • The PEACE Act (S. 4278) — actual legislation introduced by a sitting U.S. Senator — literally contains this finding:
    “Congress has not appropriated funds for the Board of Peace or authorized the expenditure of Federal funds for its operations.”
    That’s not my opinion. That’s the text of a bill Congress is considering because the money doesn’t exist yet.
  • Trump’s own FY2027 State Department request (April 3, 2026) is just that — a request. Not law. Congress hasn’t passed it. The vague language about “could support” is the bureaucratic version of “maybe if we’re lucky.”
  • The administration scraped together ~$1.25 billion in reallocations from other accounts and even that is getting sued and investigated as unauthorized. The official Board of Peace reconstruction fund? Still sitting at $0 in disbursed U.S. cash despite the big shiny pledge.
You don’t counter any of this with evidence.

You just screech “LIE!”, “DENIAL!”, and trot out imaginary logical fallacies you apparently invented in the shower.

“Contextomy”? Buddy, that’s not even on the fallacy list — you’re out here speed-running the Dunning-Kruger greatest hits while the adults are posting actual hyperlinks.

So let me translate your entire posting history into plain English: “I have no sources, I refuse to read any, and every fact that slaps me in the face is therefore fake, a lie, or some secret fallacy only I can see.”

That’s not argumentation. That’s performance art for people who think “nuh-uh” is a rebuttal.

Next time you want to LARP as the forum’s resident budget expert, try bringing receipts instead of throwing a tantrum and calling everyone “Pretender” like a discount Bond villain who lost his henchmen and his dignity.

The $10 billion? Still unappropriated.

Your credibility? Appropriated straight into the void the moment you typed “moron” instead of a link.

You’re not “Into The Night.”

You’re Into The Cope.

Drop the act, post a source, or enjoy the silence while the grown-ups keep posting the actual law.

Your move, genius.
 
Trump said there were immediate huge donations when he dreamed up the grift and announced it .


There could be, and we wouldn't necessarily know about it.

Instead of using the transparent World Bank channel, the Board of Peace has been routing incoming donations directly into a private corporate account held at JPMorgan.

Unlike the World Bank framework, this JPMorgan account lacks independent public transparency requirements. A Board of Peace official defended the move, stating that contributors simply opted to use "other options" and that the organization will report its financials to its own executive board "at a time deemed appropriate".
 
It happens to be common knoledge
No link no convo. Those are your standards. You surely aren't going to try to expect things of others that you won't do yourself?

Oh wait, yes you will. You are a marxist. They are always do as I say, not as I do. But........

you can go fuck yourself
 
No link no convo. Those are your standards. You surely aren't going to try to expect things of others that you won't do yourself?

Oh wait, yes you will. You are a marxist. They are always do as I say, not as I do. But........

you can go fuck yourself
We sane Republicans/Conservatives have been telling and proving that these forum dems and any other dem that votes for dems are truly Marxists. Now if only these Marxists were able to realize and accept that their graduation went from soft socialism to outright Marxism--then they'll be much better off for dong so.
 
We sane Republicans/Conservatives have been telling and proving that these forum dems and any other dem that votes for dems are truly Marxists. Now if only these Marxists were able to realize and accept that their graduation went from soft socialism to outright Marxism--then they'll be much better off for dong so.

You can't even define the terms.
 
@Into the Night, Bless your heart.

You’ve now posted “Already appropriated, Pretender,” “It has already been approved, moron,” and your signature gourmet word salad about a magical “contextomy fallacy”… and still not a single bill number, Public Law, Congressional Record page, vote tally, or even a screenshot of the appropriations text.
Random phrases. No apparent coherency.
Nada. The intellectual equivalent of “trust me bro, the check’s in the mail.”
Nope. It's already appropriated.
Meanwhile, reality is laughing at you:
Go learn what 'reality' means. It is not sentient.
...deleted AI slop and whining...
Whining gets you nowhere. Neither does AI slop.
 
There could be, and we wouldn't necessarily know about it.

Instead of using the transparent World Bank channel, the Board of Peace has been routing incoming donations directly into a private corporate account held at JPMorgan.

Unlike the World Bank framework, this JPMorgan account lacks independent public transparency requirements. A Board of Peace official defended the move, stating that contributors simply opted to use "other options" and that the organization will report its financials to its own executive board "at a time deemed appropriate".
So? Are you trying to make a point here?
 
Back
Top