Gotta love those ballot dumps if you are a marxist

Figure this out yet?
Yea, it's a motte and bailey fallacy. So?

He starts with a generalized statement. She then gives three specific examples that contradict his statement and the cartoon makes it sound like this disproves the generalized statement in the first panel.

It doesn't. Instead, it shows there are exceptions to the first statement made. That doesn't invalidate it, but rather just shows that as a generalization there are clear exceptions.
 
Yea, it's a motte and bailey fallacy. So?

He starts with a generalized statement. She then gives three specific examples that contradict his statement and the cartoon makes it sound like this disproves the generalized statement in the first panel.

It doesn't. Instead, it shows there are exceptions to the first statement made. That doesn't invalidate it, but rather just shows that as a generalization there are clear exceptions.

OMG.

:palm:
 
It's the absolute truth. Republicans know their ideas suck. The only way they can win is to suppress the vote.
11brh4.jpg
 
Yea, it's a motte and bailey fallacy. So?

He starts with a generalized statement. She then gives three specific examples that contradict his statement and the cartoon makes it sound like this disproves the generalized statement in the first panel.

It doesn't. Instead, it shows there are exceptions to the first statement made. That doesn't invalidate it, but rather just shows that as a generalization there are clear exceptions.


See if this helps.


View: https://x.com/iamyesyouareno/status/2063653580049989955?s=20
 
Beautiful? More like trivial objections fallacy. It is simply a dodge. No proof would be good enough for Cypress.
Offer any proof there was "voter fraud" in 2020. 60 cases trump and his thugs brought to try to challenge the election - some of the cases brought before judges HE appointed - all rejected.
 
Back
Top