Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
Nice try at deflection, but unfortunately for you, you are quite transparent.
Now that they rigged Pratt out who wins?
- Thread starter Teflon Don
- Start date
lol. Another great attempt at "Evangelism Through Deception"... I'm going to need to keep my definition handy. It isn't all encompassing, but you are clearly well defined within and very predictable when it is applied to you.
My best guess is you will try again at the "you just don't understand" deception. Though you will say it in some way that makes it even more stupid.
ZenMode
Well-known member
A mathematician probably wouldn't take into consideration that Dems vote by mail more than Republicans.
Socialism Def
For those who think it's easier to annoy you than to Google 'Socialism def' themselves.
The central deception that I spoke of earlier. First the left makes it so you do not get a ballot other than through the mail, then push a narrative that magically only republicans choose to vote in person, in fact republicans by their description ONLY vote in person... It's an absurdity, the vast majority of republicans mail in their ballot because that is how they are told to return it.A mathematician probably wouldn't take into consideration that Dems vote by mail more than Republicans.
But by pushing this narrative for decades they now have the True Believers convinced. However they ignore that they have centralized the mail in ballot so that every ballot is mailed in unless an effort is taken to vote in person making it so that the narrative is a simplistic and obvious lie. Right wingers vote by mail because that is how they receive their ballot.
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
that is what you guys keep trying to gaslight us on to justify the rigging of the electionA mathematician probably wouldn't take into consideration that Dems vote by mail more than Republicans.
Look, I have been very clear. Everything that they do in Commiefornistan is legal according to their laws. They legally rig the election in their favor.
Yes, they would. Again, you miss the point that Raman received the vast majority of the mail in ballots. Math says Bass and Raman should have retained a somewhat comparable proportion. Raman did not even carry her own district.A mathematician probably wouldn't take into consideration that Dems vote by mail more than Republicans.
To make it even more ridiculous, they are still counting ballots, and postmarks mean nothing. CA election laws allow any received ballot to only need a handwritten date inside the envelope.
Right, left, or in between, there is no rational person on earth who would believe this is statistically a joke.
Notice I will remove the TDS riddled lefties here who still claim there is nothing smelly in CA elections.
BTW, if it is clean, why would election officials refuse to allow the Feds to audit?
Paging QPeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
California officials have actively opposed and resisted a federal audit of voter rolls, citing "state privacy laws and other concerns", leading to an ongoing legal battle with the U.S. Department of Justice.
The DOJ has requested voter registration records under federal laws like the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), Help America Vote Act (HAVA), and Civil Rights Act to verify eligibility and maintenance compliance. This effort has been ongoing for over a year.
State officials, including the Secretary of State's office (under Shirley Weber), have refused to comply, arguing it violates "state privacy protections". This has resulted in a federal lawsuit by the DOJ against California.
Governor Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Rob Bonta have pushed back against federal involvement. In May 2026, Newsom signed SB 73, which codified resistance to federal access to voter rolls, voting systems, or ballots by law enforcement (including federal agents). Bonta called federal probes "baseless".
This is framed by California Democrats as protecting "voter privacy" and "preventing interference".
The DOJ has requested voter registration records under federal laws like the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), Help America Vote Act (HAVA), and Civil Rights Act to verify eligibility and maintenance compliance. This effort has been ongoing for over a year.
State officials, including the Secretary of State's office (under Shirley Weber), have refused to comply, arguing it violates "state privacy protections". This has resulted in a federal lawsuit by the DOJ against California.
Governor Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Rob Bonta have pushed back against federal involvement. In May 2026, Newsom signed SB 73, which codified resistance to federal access to voter rolls, voting systems, or ballots by law enforcement (including federal agents). Bonta called federal probes "baseless".
This is framed by California Democrats as protecting "voter privacy" and "preventing interference".
ADreamOfLiberty
Verified User
If the elections were real at this point in technological history you would have a link to the publicly available data. Deep faking is possible and nothing can be known for absolute certain, but that does not cut in favor of trusting a system based around paper and "trust me bro"; rather the opposite.
I have seen public record access closed and retroactively scrubbed. "official county records" may not be what was observed at the time through different channels.
I have watched court cases where election officials have lied in open court, been caught in the next session, and the psuedojudge didn't give a shit and sided with the cheaters. (Arizona miss-sized ballot long line trial)
I don't need to see more to know there is a culture (some might say an informal conspiracy) of fraud and obstruction. The fact that some claims of evidence are fabricated does not change that. It is to be expected.
There are fraudulent claims of holocaust victims and fake photos of nazi war crimes but that does not mean they didn't happen.
"one drop leaked out years ago"
If there is a hole in the gasket, there is a hole in the gasket. Survivorship bias, heard of it?
If the ONLY time we heard about a dog voting is when the person who committed the fraud admitted to it publicly (without prompting), what does that mean?
Possibly, and if I saw the dominant power in Florida resisting audits and fervently clawing to create or worsen vulnerabilities I would also have reasonable certainty that they know they are benefiting from the cheating and are acting to maintain power in betrayal of any democratic principle they claim to hold.
Almost innumerable examples, but chew on this: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/just...ates-failure-provide-voter-registration-rolls
I said "(recounts of scrambled ballots are not meaningful audits)."
There is no such thing as a full audit when the system was designed (including modifications of questionable legality) to be inauditable. It is the ongoing fierce choice to create and maintain inauditable systems that is the sufficient evidence I referred to.
A pattern of "mistakes" and "sacrifices" when sufficiently inexcusable, widespread, and consistent can be accurately called intention.
Because companies will pretend to do an impossible task if they get paid upon failure. Also "35" isn't found in this wiki, mostly irrelevant since the data needed to audit the election was never recorded or destroyed, but even the puppet show version of an audit you don't seem to be describing accurately.
2021 Maricopa County presidential ballot audit - Wikipedia
View: https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/2064492962323874068
2000 mules has not been meaningfully debunked.
The unspoken premise you hope to sneak by there is "if it's legal, it's not rigged"
That premise is rejected. Heard of Jim Crow?
I'm sure that's how the pretender regime in California would agree whole heartedly, and they would offer a plea deal for five days of community service to the person who happened to get caught paying people for ballots.
That community service would be to be raise election awareness.
They would not investigate anyone for doing the same thing. They would not charge anyone except at massive public outcry from open admission being filmed.
See what I'm describing is the "big picture". The word "systemic" comes to mind.
If I am rained on, and I see rain falling all around me, that is evidence that there is a storm cloud above me.
I DO have evidence of this happening on a scale that matters, I just relayed it to you. You can assert that it is not evidence based on the false premise that the fundamental theorem of statistics (samples inform about larger scopes) is wrong, but that is an irrational and likely dishonest claim to make.
You have no way to know that. All available evidence when correctly analyzed by factoring in likely filters supports the conclusion that the scale of the 'inaccuracy' is on the same order of magnitude as the swing in almost every election of interest.
You are not entitled to contradict the evidence with baseless appeals to ignorance. Your bar for proof is irrational, unacceptable, almost certainly hypocritical, and failure to reach it does not sway reasonable honest observers.
ZenMode
Well-known member
I think all states still allow voting in person. I know CA does. I also think that mail-in voting was probably pretty similar before Trump started telling Rs not to vote by mail. Since then, the data shows a the mail-in leans pretty heavily toward mail-in.
I remember watching the 2024 election coverage on CNN/Fox. Texas is one of the states where they're allowed to count mail-in ballots before election day so, once the polls close, Texas has the mail-in results ready to release. The early map of Texas, when the mail-in ballot results were released, had EVERY county blue. Every single one.
Texas eventually went Red for Trump once the in-person votes were tallied.
Voting by mail»
The use of mail ballots in 2024 decreased from pandemic-era levels but stayed above historical norms.»
- The percentage of voters casting ballots bymail decreased to 29%, down from 43% in2020 but up from 21% in 2016.» The partisan divide in mail voting continued, withmore Democrats than Republicans utilizing thismethod, although the gap narrowed because ofdeclining usage among Democrats.»
- Thirty-seven percent of Democrats reported voting by mail, compared to 24% of Republicans. This is a decrease from 60% for Democrats and 32% for Republicans in 2020.
I have no idea, that shit doesn’t interest me. I think you knew.
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
deception????????????
Show me the statistics?
ZenMode
Well-known member
There's no rigging. Both parties operate under the same rules.
ZenMode
Well-known member
Impossible based on what?
They have been presented over and over in the last week. Do your own research.