LOL. Good job. Exactly as predicted.
Now that they rigged Pratt out who wins?
- Thread starter Teflon Don
- Start date
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
Who made the rules? The Democrat majority party. The GOp had zero say in it
You are being deliberately obtuse
I wrote it, you idiot.
ADreamOfLiberty
Verified User
It is to help off-the-wall parties. It does not help the Dems either. The community is 87 percent Dem.https://calvoter.org/content/what-californias-%E2%80%98jungle-primary%E2%80%99-%E2%80%94-and-why-does-it-matter-so-much-governor%E2%80%99s-race
ZenMode
Well-known member
There were 14 candidates.
The reason why is below. BTW, this explanation was all over the place. A minimal amount of Google searching would have answered the question.
What happened in this case is that there was a lag in an automated update such that some candidates’ votes were added in one update and the other candidates followed about a minute later,” reads the AP statement. “Specifically, an electronic update from the Los Angeles County website pulled in votes for only one group of candidates, including Karen Bass and Nithya Raman. Exactly one minute later, the electronic update picked up the votes for another group of candidates including Spencer Pratt. Taken together, the updates included 21,870 votes for Pratt, 12,850 votes for Bass and 9,521 votes for Raman, along with votes for other candidates.”
L.A. mayoral race voter fraud claim gets debunked – by Trump’s Justice Department
Even Trump's own handpicked U.S. Attorney is disputing one widely peddled claim of voter fraud in L.A.'s mayoral primary.
www.democracydocket.com
You're ignoring complexity and patterns to proclaim what you want to believe.
Doesn't look like it:
Did dog illegally vote in California election? Sniffing out the truth
Prosecutors said a vote cast in the dog's name was counted in California's 2021 gubernatorial recall election.www.snopes.com
From YOUR link:
Prosecutors said a vote cast in the dog's name was counted in California's 2021 gubernatorial recall election.
Yes, it would counted in the 2021 local election and rejected in the 2022 mid-terms. That's what I said.
what are you talking about????
I said: "Part of the reason people don't commit voter fraud is because the legal penalties are harsh."
You said: "No, they aren't because they're never caught, because nobody in power wants them caught."
You aren't a reasonable person. You create reality as needed to reinforce what you want to believe....
Oh and, yes, I ignored the Wall Street Apes Tweet with a drug addled homeless person. Why in the hell would you put any value in that? Oh, right... it helps you believe what you want to believe.
There's no reasoning with the unreasonable. You are not a reasonable person.
ADreamOfLiberty
Verified User
Ever heard the word "camouflage"? What about Jamming with white noise?There were 14 candidates.
The reason why is below. BTW, this explanation was all over the place. A minimal amount of Google searching would have answered the question.
What happened in this case is that there was a lag in an automated update such that some candidates’ votes were added in one update and the other candidates followed about a minute later,” reads the AP statement. “Specifically, an electronic update from the Los Angeles County website pulled in votes for only one group of candidates, including Karen Bass and Nithya Raman. Exactly one minute later, the electronic update picked up the votes for another group of candidates including Spencer Pratt. Taken together, the updates included 21,870 votes for Pratt, 12,850 votes for Bass and 9,521 votes for Raman, along with votes for other candidates.”
L.A. mayoral race voter fraud claim gets debunked – by Trump’s Justice Department
Even Trump's own handpicked U.S. Attorney is disputing one widely peddled claim of voter fraud in L.A.'s mayoral primary.
If this was true then there would have been many updates with 0 change for one candidate or another. Was there? Where is the neutral party record of that?
Where is the blockchain log that could easily have been built decades ago?
So for no underlying technical reason they decided to make it look like fraud but "trust me bro". I don't trust them, for good cause.
Thanks I could actually read it in the smaller text just fine.
So you going to admit you were wrong about the dog's ballot being rejected before she went public?
Thanks for the recap. You didn't rebut or debunk anything, but you have successfully reproduced two quotes.
You're losing the debate and looking for an escape route, but there is no one to fool. I don't know why people even bother with that. Does it help you sleep? I think if you cared enough to lie about it, it will still bother you.
Yea I noticed.
Well that particular drug addled homeless person hasn't lied repeatedly in national media and in court. So that puts her ahead of democrat leadership and their goons entrenched in bureaucracy.
It's a snowflake in the avalanche of evidence. A tree in the forest that you refuse to see. Because:
I love it when you display reason and logic. It's like Kryptonite to MAGATs.
Let me know if he does, will you?
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
I may not know who is eventually going to win and be mayor of LA, Bass or Raman, but I do know who loses: The people living in LA...
BartenderElite
Verified User
Literally none of this matters. When elections don't go the exact way that MAGA's want them to go, there can only be one explanation.
Thanks again, Trump.
Last edited:
What are DSA’s?
ZenMode
Well-known member
You're still making things up
Ok, so we're just going to ignore the fact that you are so uninformed and have so little intellectual curiosity that you actually thought there were only three candidates.
You're still making things up. As the article blurb noted, and Trump's Justice department confirmed, it was a glitch. Normally all updates go at once.
Sure, why not. It's not about what is known, it's about creating doubt anywhere possible. You're a conspiracy theorist and are, therefore, great at that.
You don't trust anything because you're a conspiracy theorist who, even if every state got rid of all mail-in voting and required a government issued ID, would still distrust election results in blue states.
Nope. As the blurb noted, the first vote was counted and the second wasn't.
There is no debate because nobody can debate the unfettered imagination of a conspiracy theorist. Nothing.... really nothing....will sway your beliefs.
Right...again...you will accept ANY source that tells you what you want to believe, including some random person on Twitter questioning a drugged up homeless person.
You have no standards and you have is a thirst for confirmation bias.
Because you create a forest of trees based on your imagination.
ZenMode
Well-known member
Agree. If a Rep wins, the election was legit. If a Rep loses, it was rigged, stolen, etc.
MAGA is playing tennis without a net.
@ADreamOfLiberty
So you made up your own definition of socialism? Would certainly explain the Draconian nature of the interpretation
cawacko
Well-known member
Since much of the board is not from California, here's how the local elections work.
Los Angeles - the race is non-partisan, there are no party labels next to people's names, and if you get 50% you win. If no one gets 50% then the top two go to a run off - they have done this for a long time, well before Prop 14
San Francisco - basically did the same thing as L.A. up until the early 2000's when it went to ranked choice voting
Oakland - same as SF, changed around 2010 to ranked choice voting
Los Angeles - the race is non-partisan, there are no party labels next to people's names, and if you get 50% you win. If no one gets 50% then the top two go to a run off - they have done this for a long time, well before Prop 14
San Francisco - basically did the same thing as L.A. up until the early 2000's when it went to ranked choice voting
Oakland - same as SF, changed around 2010 to ranked choice voting
cawacko
Well-known member
democratic socialists
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Their latest--and it's openly admitted by them--is the "Red Rabbit" program to train rioters and violent protesters how to fight the police and create general mayhem.
Walk, Rabbit, Walk: Protecting the Left nonviolently - Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)
As our profile increases, so do violent provocations. DSA’s Red Rabbits are taking both security and nonviolence seriously.
www.dsausa.org
Inside the DSA’s Emerging Militant Network
The Democratic Socialists of America’s “Red Rabbits” are conducting “security trainings” that risk the group’s legally protected status.
www.city-journal.org
Democratic Socialists of America’s ‘Red Rabbits’ prep for ‘national uprising’ against police
A subgroup of the Democratic Socialists of America called the "Red Rabbits" is prepping for a "national uprising" against law enforcement.
www.bizpacreview.com
I guess Antifa has become the new "L" word so the DSA is changing the name to something new just like Liberal became Progressive...