I was WRONG! He got Murder 1, life sentnce. The appeal process probably will get little to no national coverage.
How much more wrong can you be?
I was WRONG! He got Murder 1, life sentnce. The appeal process probably will get little to no national coverage.
Hey Taich,.......Told ya,.....dumb fuck,All of this silly talk means nothing. In fact you can talk and talk and talk until you are blue in the face,........and it STILL means nothing. In the end karmelo's ass will go to prison for a VERY long time. None of us will even be alive on his release day,....if he even gets a release day which in itself is highly doubtful. So,....keep TALKING,....right up till the time they throw his little ass in the cell and slam the door shut. We all KNOW this is how it ends ,....so yeah,....have fun with that.......Welcome to reality.
![]()
Most likely will get manslaughter, 20 years. Then it goes to appeal.
Judging from how the trial went his appeals won't have much luck in changing things.I was WRONG! He got Murder 1, life sentnce. The appeal process probably will get little to no national coverage.
1. What you "consider" is irrelevant in light of the FACTS that NewsMax, First Choice, Fox News and the like ALL cover national news. A matter of history, a matter of fact that is easily proved via viewership or google of current events that appear on their broadcast.I would not consider News Max to be a 'national coverage' example
Appeals usually do not get the same attention because they are less emotional and more procedural.
nothing will stop you from crying and whining though
Hmm, does that go for the joker that shot up all those people at that Nevada concert? Or the Jan. 6th that beat up/injured/killed cops? We could trade cases all day and night, but some how I doubt if you could overcome your racial hypocrisy.Are JPP marxists still defending this animal? People have had enough.
No more white guilt.
Gonna chimp out? Gotta pay the price
bla bla bla.1. What you "consider" is irrelevant in light of the FACTS that NewsMax, First Choice, Fox News and the like ALL cover national news. A matter of history, a matter of fact that is easily proved via viewership or google of current events that appear on their broadcast.
2. You're wrong again as usual. For your education:
An appeal is a formal legal request for a higher court to review and potentially change the decision of a lower court.
www.constitutioncenter.org/blog/a-short-list-of-overturned-supreme-court-landmark-decisions
3. Major projection on your part.
Mike Howard was retained as private counsel by the family. He had prior public-defender experience, but that does not mean he was court-appointed in this case.Didn't his family have $650,000 to hire an attorney?
$650,000 is a lot of moneyMike Howard was retained as private counsel by the family. He had prior public-defender experience, but that does not mean he was court-appointed in this case.
I imagine the legal fees were very high
yep. and your point? people are free to donate to causes you do not approve of$650,000 is a lot of money
Translation: Zymurgy dodges denies, attempts to change the subject, personally attacks .. . Anything but discuss the facts and logic I presented that prove his assertions and such flat out wrong.bla bla bla.
Thank you for defining “appeal.”
Now define “non sequitur,” because that is what your reply was.
you have to be the most boring person on the face of the Earth
Appeals usually do not get the same attention because they are less emotional and more procedural. you said nothing to counter this.
"An appeal is a formal legal request for a higher court to review and potentially change the decision of a lower court."
And?
BORING
You are mistaking “I pasted a link” for “I made an argument.”Translation: Zymurgy dodges denies, attempts to change the subject, personally attacks .. . Anything but discuss the facts and logic I presented that prove his assertions and such flat out wrong.
But I expect nothing less from our maga/alt-right peanut gallery.
The chronology of the post makes you a liar, gumby. Any intellectually honest and objective reader can click back and see that. Posts #178 and 187. All you'll do now is repeat your BS ad nausea. Good luck with that.You are mistaking “I pasted a link” for “I made an argument.”
A list of landmark Supreme Court reversals does not prove that a state criminal appeal will get major national coverage. It proves that Google worked.
you are confused and a boreThe chronology of the post makes you a liar, gumby. Any intellectually honest and objective reader can click back and see that. Posts #178 and 187. All you'll do now is repeat your BS ad nausea. Good luck with that.