Poll: Should all reactions generate a positive score?
- Thread starter Damocles
- Start date
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
There's other, better, and free AI image makers.$20 app to the rescue. lol
I really don't give a shit about him. He is gone and that elevates the quality of this forum a bit.Well, if it was by trashing the forum on Twitter with his 22 followers that really aren't, I'm pretty sure we'll be OK.
This is just a hobby to Damo anyway. Me too, for that matter.
Dutch done changed his name on USMB. He's still the same cretin, though. It won't be long before he gets permed with all his pedo talk.
Pedo this, pedo that, seems he says it more than anyone I've ever seen.
Dutch's 22 X followers:
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
It only shows verified followers, and he has none.
"
@AgentX_DC doesn’t have any verified followers.
When someone verified follows this account, they’ll show up here."
High Noon!
What a town full of Chickenshits
What a town full of Chickenshits
Glengarry Glen Ross is about con artists, not producers. Somehow you got it in your mind that stealing from people who produce is the same as producing.
Like politicians who pass taxes on the people who produce wealth and then vote for spending bills that they benefit from?
Like that?
If tax money is well spent, it allows a good environment for people to produce wealth. It is hard to produce wealth without roads or schools.
Opinions differ on what constitutes "well-spent". Don't they?
And you seem to have ignored the substance of my inquiry, as well.
Do you consider politicians who pass taxes on the people who produce wealth and then vote for spending bills that they benefit from to be con artists?
Yes, which is why we have elections. Every sane person agrees we should have taxes to spend on important parts of our society. The debate is over what exactly to spend the taxes on.
See, no sane person would argue that all taxes are con artists.
As for should politicians be allowed to benefit along with the rest of society, I guess they should. Do you propose that politicians be banned from driving on roads along with other citizens?
You're dodging the issue.
I didn't say that "all taxes are con artists".
I asked a direct question. Do you consider politicians who pass taxes on the people who produce wealth and then vote for spending bills that they benefit from to be con artists?
Did you think that "driving on roads" was what I was asking you about?
