Huge '8647' etched into grass on the National Mall, aerial images show
- Thread starter Guno צְבִי
- Start date
So not voting for trump is like murdering him?
Doesn't that mean you have murdered several Presidents now?
Yes, with YOU! Your ONLY standards: Double.
Dude, you keep calling me, "hamas". You might as well call me, "plaid". Neither are true and your continued bleeting of that word is only making you look more stupid - that is - if you could be any more of an idiot! You're really setting a record here!
Actually, I have a pretty tight ass, my friend. My as cheeks are like stone!
I see you're outright lying to slander me again. Not sure how it is I can't reply to your outright fucking lies - maybe @Phantasmal can clear that up, or @Damocles ?
The fuck you are.
You are a rabid Antisemite, as nearly all Marxist democrats are.
What the fuck are you yapping about? Are you too stoned to grasp the subject of the thread?
That's why you have a contract... you really should look into more acceptable ways to win if that's your ultimate goal... you shouldn't have to change my post... i why is it impossibility to just chat around here? If you think I'm boring and stupid you should probably put me on ignore... because your replies to me are just a waste and it's time you'll never get back... life is short make the most of it ..don't waste time...
ok...good chat... . You said thousands of people right?
LOL. Well, in the same way not voting for Hillary was the same thing as murdering her....
Well, using this criteria we have all murdered several candidates.
What gives trump the right to put his name over Kennedy on the Kennedy Center?
Quit with the tantrum and answer the fucking question.
The courts said "nothing"... I'll go with nothing for $200, Alex. Final answer.
lol. I love how this makes it seem like you'd have no problem with it if he put his name after Kennedy....
You're funny.
Thanks, but I'm hoping @Uncensored2008 will quit with the deflecting and answer a legitimate question for once.
Ar! Ar! Ar! <--- remember "Mork and Mindy"?
20 or more people a week, 50 weeks per year, for 10 years... So about 10,000 times... There were a lot of repeat customers in there, so a few thousand people.
Probably quite a bit more, I once got a police order to 86 almost 500 people at once, and maybe two dozen times had to 86 more than a 100 people.
The numbers really start stacking up.
So you can support 86ing Clinton without having to go to prison?
QP!
Verified User
Trump selected the contractor who he claimed to know and have used based on their estimate of $1-2m price. He used an ILLEGAL no bid process to choose them while then signing a contract at 6X what he claimed, in public it would cost.
To say that is 'no problem' is a thing only a stupid person would say. He first LIED to choose a contractor with a false amount. He then broke the law by giving a no bid contract at a 6x inflated price.
...Cost controversy: While Trump claimed a $1.5–$2 million price, federal records show over $14.8 million in contracts for the project, sparking criticism over taxpayer spending.... cite
------------
...
The Legal Violation
Federal agencies are bound by the Competition in Contracting Act (CICA), which requires full and open competition for government contracts. To bypass this, the government used a rare "urgency" exception (usually reserved for natural disasters or war) to justify the no-bid award. Watchdogs, lawmakers, and preservationists filed lawsuits challenging this, arguing that using an emergency loophole for a non-emergency beautification project violates the law. Additionally, an internal Park Service review flagged the contractor's profit margin (20%) as inflated and excessive compared to federal norms (6%-12%), raising further legal scrutiny over the misuse of funds. [1, 2, 3, 4]
------------
...
The Legal Violation
Federal agencies are bound by the Competition in Contracting Act (CICA), which requires full and open competition for government contracts. To bypass this, the government used a rare "urgency" exception (usually reserved for natural disasters or war) to justify the no-bid award. Watchdogs, lawmakers, and preservationists filed lawsuits challenging this, arguing that using an emergency loophole for a non-emergency beautification project violates the law. Additionally, an internal Park Service review flagged the contractor's profit margin (20%) as inflated and excessive compared to federal norms (6%-12%), raising further legal scrutiny over the misuse of funds. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Whatevs... I think 8647, even from Comey, is freedom of speech. I am, if you haven't noticed, quite an advocate of the 1st Amendment. Including the religious freedom and the right to assemble... but more especially the speech part.
There is more. Street riots generally caused by police attacking calm protesters have little in common with people crapping on and busting up the Capitol building as they attempted to get their hands on politicians.
If you have ever been in protests, you would know that you are waiting for the police to attack and make things much worse. You also know there are unsavory types watching and waiting for that time so that they can loot.
If we cannot freely call for leaders to be non-violently thrown out of government, we have no other freedoms. If even Comey has to face punishment for politically opposing trump, soon none of us will have freedom.
QP!
Verified User
i doubt he gets a direct kickback, meaning they hand him a portion of the cash, but what i think he does, is what happens in contractor, developer circles often which is a Developer may give a contractor a 'winking' permission to charge a higher rate on one project, where they are acting as the General Contractor but it is not their money funding the build out, but then on the next project, where it is their money funding it, they expect and get a discount on that work.
That happens in legal circles too, where one company has to agree to pay for the diligence a second company or person is doing to 'invest' or for other reasons, and that second company gets to use their own lawyers for that diligence so they 'winkingly' give permission to 'max charge' for it, and then get a discount on their own legal needs in the next round.
Very common quid pro quo type stuff that i am sure Trump is taking advantage by giving 'no bid' contracts to his usual contractors, and allowing them to charge over normal market rates.