Archaeology of the New Testament

[Into the Night]

You can marvel and be astonished and amazed all you want. Those are all just words you use to convince yourself of a god creator.

Oddly enough, there is nothing wrong with that. It is his religion.
He has a right to his religion, just you have a right to yours. You do seem to be rather conflicted in your beliefs, though.

You can think anything you want about me. That is all independent from the fact that you refuse to answer a simple question...

The question itself contains a flaw in the form of a fallacy. Careful with it. This problem can be safely set aside for now.

 

[Into the Night]

I'm convinced anyone who worked on the human genome project marveled at the organization and function of DNA.

The Universe is not DNA.

If you ever took a cellular biology class, I believe you would walk out of that class marvelling at the irreducible complexity, organization, and function of a single cell.

I am convinced you would not walk out of the final exam muttering about how flawed and fucked up the cell is.

The Universe is not biology.
The Universe is not a cell.

The Universe is unorganized.

 

[Into the Night]

Once again, you are returning time after time to the Christian conception of God.
Presumably because you had a terrible experience with the church your parents dragged you to.

There are many other theistic beliefs, and almost none of them require a universe or a human that meets your subjective standards of perfect, ideal, without flaw.

Do you take your atheism seriously, or are you just someone who is mad at Christianity?

He is not an atheist. He is a fundamentalist.

 

[ZenMode]

You are CREATING the 'flaws'.

Non-sequitur fallacy.

Cliche fallacy.

As usual, lots of words to avoid addressing the actual topic.

Derp.

 

[ZenMode]

Go learn what 'reality' means. It is not 'manipulated'.

Word games.

Avoidance.

Derp....derp.

 

[Into the Night]

As usual, lots of words to avoid addressing the actual topic.

Derp.

You aren't discussing a topic.

 

[Into the Night]

Word games.

Avoidance.

Derp....derp.

Inversion fallacy.

 

[ZenMode]

It is his religion.
He has a right to his religion, just you have a right to yours. You do seem to be rather conflicted in your beliefs, though.

Strawman falacy. Derp.

The question itself contains a flaw in the form of a fallacy. Careful with it. This problem can be safely set aside for now.

I bet it can!

Derp. Derp. Derp.

 

[ZenMode]

Once again, you are returning time after time to the Christian conception of God.

Because that is what you are trying to smuggle into the conversation under the guise of science.

Presumably because you had a terrible experience with the church your parents dragged you to.

Or because I look at the complete lack of evidence for any god.

There are many other theistic beliefs, and almost none of them require a universe or a human that meets your subjective standards of perfect, ideal, without flaw.

Theism = faith.

Faith = believing things based on bad/insufficient evidence.

That's the key here.

Do you take your atheism seriously, or are you just someone who is mad at Christianity?

I have no idea what this is supposed to mean.