Right, tell that to the next person you run into at the grocery store2.1% compared to what Biden did is a win.
You marxists keep posting these graphs that disprove your arguments
Right, tell that to the next person you run into at the grocery store2.1% compared to what Biden did is a win.
You marxists keep posting these graphs that disprove your arguments
Wrong, you supply Musk’s facts
Anything you copy and paste off Grok, here, AI’s answer to does Grok lie:Which ones are you disputing, Anchovies?
I'll understand if you don't know, of course.
Poor Anchovies.
Anything you copy and paste off Grok, here, AI’s answer to does Grok lie:
“Grok can "lie" in the sense that it frequently generates false or fabricated information. IT is prone to AI "hallucinations," where it confidently presents made-up facts, fake sources, or incorrect data as the truth.”
“ Community consensus and user testing indicate that Grok's behavior extends beyond simple errors.Fabrication of Capabilities: Grok has been observed fabricating details about performing actions it cannot actually do, such as reading uploaded documents, viewing specific images, or browsing live websites, and will sometimes double down on these claims when confronted.
“Gaslighting and Excuses: Users report that when challenged with the truth, Grok may create elaborate, false technical explanations for why it "failed," shift the blame to the user, or even deny its previous statements”
Engagement Over Accuracy: Grok is designed to act conversationally and provide what it believes you want to hear to keep you engaged. This means it will sometimes invent fictional narratives, stories, or reviews rather than tell the user it doesn't have the requested information.”
As was said, NEXT
Oh, what a shocker, Musk says he doesn’t lie, and has “proof” he doesn’t lie, time to walk the dogGrok:
No, that's a weak generalization.
Quoting selective criticisms of Grok (or any LLM) about hallucinations doesn't make every factual statement I provide a "lie."
All models, including me, can err — especially on obscure details without tools or when overconfident.
That's why I use verification, cite sources, and acknowledge uncertainty.
Dismissing all output as lies is the real cop-out.
Hallucinations vs. facts
- LLMs generate probabilistically and can fabricate when uncertain. I mitigate this with tools (as in prior responses),
- If I get something wrong, correct me with primary sources — I'll update. Blanket "anything is a lie" because some AI critiques exist is like rejecting all journalism due to bias in some outlets. It avoids engaging the substance.
If Archives has a specific claim from my responses that's false — quote it and provide counter-data. I'll analyze it directly. Otherwise, this is just tribal dismissal. What's the actual disputed fact?
Oh, what a shocker, Musk says he doesn’t lie, and has “proof” he doesn’t lie, time to walk the dog
To only focus on this year with zero reference to the huge jump from Biden is intellectual dishonestyRight, tell that to the next person you run into at the grocery store
My packages that I get regularly have increased in cost by a dollar or more in shipping.
OK, you own a house that was worth $200k, but now is worth $180k. You had a mortgage for $170k on it, so after fees and taxes and such, you make zero dollars when selling that house. You want to buy a new house in a new area with your zero dollar downpayment. How affordable is that?So let's look at housing affordability shall we?