What have Communists unleashed?

Uncensored2008

Uncensored2008

Well-known member
Contributor
Barack Obama, as titular head of the democrat party, has used the most violent and radical elements of the left since 2008. The violence of the Floyd insurgency and the current ICE Out Insurrection are the primary political tool of Obama's democrats.

But can Obama control his Brown Shirts? The Biden Puppetcy was a thinly veiled 3rd term for Obama that fooled literally no one. The Brown Shirts recently turned on child molester and democrat darling Scott Weiner in California, and Dan Goldman.

Now the Brown Shirts have turned on Obama's puppet. Veggie Joe endured the ire of the radical fringe - which now is the mainstream of democrats.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2071036212555468937
View: https://x.com/AndrewKolvet/status/2071036212555468937?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2071036212555468937%7Ctwgr%5E026ce58407b39b3a34c897c775392cdfc174ee5c%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftownhall.com%2Ftipsheet%2Fmattvespa%2F2026%2F06%2F29%2Fjoe-why-did-you-go-to-this-event-n2678451


What Obama created and nurtured appears ready to consume it's creator.
 
 
Last edited:
Jade Dragon said:
Another special needs MAGA blurting out buzzwords they don't comprehend. Don't you have any new buzzwords?
Click to expand...

So, have you lost control of your terrorist wing? Looks like your Brown Shirts have turned on you, Comrade.

Your party created a monster, but that monster is set to consume it's creator.

Just in time for the midterms, Comrade.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Barack Obama, as titular head of the democrat party, has used the most violent and radical elements of the left since 2008. The violence of the Floyd insurgency and the current ICE Out Insurrection are the primary political tool of Obama's democrats.

But can Obama control his Brown Shirts? The Biden Puppetcy was a thinly veiled 3rd term for Obama that fooled literally no one. The Brown Shirts recently turned on child molester and democrat darling Scott Weiner in California, and Dan Goldman.

Now the Brown Shirts have turned on Obama's puppet. Veggie Joe endured the ire of the radical fringe - which now is the mainstream of democrats.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2071036212555468937
View: https://x.com/AndrewKolvet/status/2071036212555468937?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2071036212555468937%7Ctwgr%5E026ce58407b39b3a34c897c775392cdfc174ee5c%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftownhall.com%2Ftipsheet%2Fmattvespa%2F2026%2F06%2F29%2Fjoe-why-did-you-go-to-this-event-n2678451


What Obama created and nurtured appears ready to consume it's creator.
Click to expand...
Jaysus, now Obama is responsible for the protest against Ice tactics and the Social Democrats are Brown Shirts, and all along they’ve been telling us it was Antifa and George Soros

What’s a MAGA without someone to hate, and if that someone is black, bonus for them
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Barack Obama, as titular head of the democrat party, has used the most violent and radical elements of the left since 2008. The violence of the Floyd insurgency and the current ICE Out Insurrection are the primary political tool of Obama's democrats.

But can Obama control his Brown Shirts? The Biden Puppetcy was a thinly veiled 3rd term for Obama that fooled literally no one. The Brown Shirts recently turned on child molester and democrat darling Scott Weiner in California, and Dan Goldman.

Now the Brown Shirts have turned on Obama's puppet. Veggie Joe endured the ire of the radical fringe - which now is the mainstream of democrats.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2071036212555468937
View: https://x.com/AndrewKolvet/status/2071036212555468937?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2071036212555468937%7Ctwgr%5E026ce58407b39b3a34c897c775392cdfc174ee5c%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftownhall.com%2Ftipsheet%2Fmattvespa%2F2026%2F06%2F29%2Fjoe-why-did-you-go-to-this-event-n2678451


What Obama created and nurtured appears ready to consume it's creator.
Click to expand...
You are the undisputed Master of Absurdity.
 
archives said:
Jaysus, now Obama is responsible for the protest against Ice tactics and the Social Democrats are Brown Shirts, and all along they’ve been telling us it was Antifa and George Soros

What’s a MAGA without someone to hate, and if that someone is black, bonus for them
Click to expand...
What do you expect from someone with am IQ lower than 35.
 
archives said:
Jaysus, now Obama is responsible for the protest against Ice tactics and the Social Democrats are Brown Shirts, and all along they’ve been telling us it was Antifa and George Soros

What’s a MAGA without someone to hate, and if that someone is black, bonus for them
Click to expand...

Has the "establishment" party lost control of the Brown Shirts? You love them when they are assaulting police, but now they are turning on the ruling class of the party.

This is ultimately the younger Communists grasping for power from the older "establishment" wing.

I notice you avoided the subject and said not a word about the heckling and shouting down of Obama's puppet, Joe. The party organized and fomented violence by the ANTIFA and BLM mobs, assuming that violence would be aimed at federal police and Americans.

This isn't an ideological struggle, both sides are Communists. This is the young radicals vs. the establishment Stalinists.

Of course the young Commies are purging all Jews from the party as well.
 
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Has the "establishment" party lost control of the Brown Shirts? You love them when they are assaulting police, but now they are turning on the ruling class of the party.

This is ultimately the younger Communists grasping for power from the older "establishment" wing.

I notice you avoided the subject and said not a word about the heckling and shouting down of Obama's puppet, Joe. The party organized and fomented violence by the ANTIFA and BLM mobs, assuming that violence would be aimed at federal police and Americans.

This isn't an ideological struggle, both sides are Communists. This is the young radicals vs. the establishment Stalinists.

Of course the young Commies are purging all Jews from the party as well.
Click to expand...
Now we got Brown Shirts, Commies, Antifa, and BLM mobs all in one thought, is their a AM radio cliche he missed?

Let me educate a little there whoever you are, Brown Shorts were Hitler’s Fascism, the Commies Stalin, they might have taught a different thing at the Trump U you attended, but the two are not the same. By the way, Antifa is a website on the dark web

There is no ideological struggle, Bernie has been a Social Democrat for decades, even close to winning the Democrat nomination for President and the Party continued on, Murdoch is lying to you

And no Democrat ever personally invited Holocaust deniers over for dinner at their homes like your Messiah did
 
evince said:
Quoting Epstein Class neo Nazis won’t win you any elections
Click to expand...


Poor Desh.

Fact check:
https://twitter.com/x/status/2071383743408091451
View: https://x.com/ArthurMacwaters/status/2071383743408091451?s=20



The claim is broadly accurate as a well-established historical estimate, though the exact figure is an approximation subject to scholarly debate.


The Post​


The X post by @ArthurMacwaters (quoting Elon Musk's "True") states: "Communism literally killed 100,000,000 people in the 20th century alone. Never give the philosophy an inch." It includes a bar chart breaking down the toll (China 65M, USSR 20M, Cambodia/North Korea 2M each, plus smaller figures for other regions, totaling ~100M).


This is a common reference to deaths under 20th-century communist regimes (executions, famines, purges, Gulags, forced labor, etc.).


The Source and Breakdown​


The ~100 million figure originates primarily from The Black Book of Communism (1997, edited by Stéphane Courtois et al.), a compilation by historians and scholars. Key estimates from its introduction:


  • China (Mao era): ~65 million (Great Leap Forward famine, Cultural Revolution, purges).
  • USSR: ~20 million (Stalin's purges, Holodomor famine, Gulags, etc.; some estimates higher).
  • Cambodia (Khmer Rouge): ~2 million (out of a small population — ~25% death rate).
  • North Korea: ~2 million.
  • Other regions (Vietnam, Eastern Europe, Africa, Afghanistan, Latin America): Smaller totals adding up to the rest.

The book and similar works (e.g., R.J. Rummel's democide research) put the total around 85–110 million for the 20th century.


Context and Caveats​


  • "Communism" here means deaths under self-proclaimed communist regimes due to policies, repression, engineered famines, etc. — not every death in a communist country or solely from ideology in a vacuum. Many were avoidable policy disasters (e.g., forced collectivization) or deliberate terror.
  • Scholarly debate: The total is an estimate, not a precise census. Critics (often on the left) argue it:
    • Includes famine deaths where intent vs. incompetence is disputed.
    • Sometimes counts war-related deaths or double-counts.
    • Ignores context like civil wars, blockades, or pre-existing conditions.Some historians (e.g., certain contributors to the book itself) quibbled with Courtois' introduction aggregating to exactly 100M, suggesting 85–94M as more precise.
      Defenders note the scale is still unprecedented and far exceeds Nazism (~20–25M, including Holocaust and war victims) in raw body count under peacetime governance.
  • Counter-arguments (e.g., "capitalism killed more") often compare apples to oranges: poverty under market systems (not centrally directed killings), colonial eras, or indirect effects. These are not equivalent to regime-directed mass murder/famine. No serious historian disputes the scale of deaths in the USSR, China, Cambodia, etc.

The image's breakdown aligns closely with standard references. North Korea and some others are harder to verify due to secrecy, but the major cases (China/USSR) are robustly documented via archives, survivor accounts, and demographic data.


Bottom Line​


The claim holds up as a reasonable, widely cited summary of the human cost of 20th-century communist regimes. It's not "literal" in a courtroom-evidence sense for every single death, but the order of magnitude is supported by extensive historical research. The "never give an inch" part is opinion, but the death toll underscores why the ideology's track record is so heavily scrutinized. For deeper reading, start with The Black Book of Communism or archival studies on the Holodomor, Great Leap Forward, and Khmer Rouge.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top