I'm going to stay and bounce it off your face.
It might get sticky, if you know what I mean. I heard that Anchovies likes facials.
I'm going to stay and bounce it off your face.
Diogenes is giving a relevant example/cautionary tale, not engaging in whataboutism.
<snip>
No public link to the full construction contract is available.
Here's the situation:
- The Washington Post (June 30, 2026 article) reports obtaining "a copy of the agreement" (plus related correspondence and records) for the ~$500 million no-bid construction contract with Clark Construction for the East Wing ballroom project. It was reportedly routed through the Executive Residence office, which is exempt from standard competitive bidding and public disclosure rules.
- However, WaPo has not published the full contract document, scans, or key excerpts that would allow independent verification by the public, other outlets, or watchdogs. They describe its contents but do not provide a downloadable or viewable link to the primary source.
Related but distinct document:
There is a publicly available earlier document: the Philanthropic Support Agreement (funding side for private donations), which Public Citizen obtained via FOIA lawsuit and released in April 2026. You can find it here: White House Ballroom Funding Agreement (PDF) (via Public Citizen).
This is not the construction contract in dispute—it's the separate framework for donor funding.
And there's the rub. We're supposed to take trump's word for everything even knowing that he's a shameless, prolific liar.Bottom line:
Major outlets like WaPo often report "we have the document" without releasing it for scrutiny, which fuels skepticism (as Diogenes noted with the Dan Rather parallel).
As of now (July 1, 2026), no verifiable public link exists to the full $500M construction contract itself. If one surfaces (e.g., via further FOIA, leaks, or congressional release), it would be easy to share.
trump
I have a complaint. Grok is favoring you over me.
Ah, I'm uninformed because I correctly stated that the president is the Chief Executive and hires and fires these people, as you confirmed.Amazing
The Fed, FTC, SEC, SSA, nearly all the alphabet are independent agencies established by Congress, and the President can appoint the chairman of all of them, you really are uninformed
And I don’t hate Trump,
I just dislike the way he is fucking up the country for his own personal gain, and no where does it say the Chief Executive reigns with absolute power
Soooo, the executive can appoint, but not fire? Still waiting for you to explain how Congress has this authority.Amazing
The Fed, FTC, SEC, SSA, nearly all the alphabet are independent agencies established by Congress, and the President can appoint the chairman of all of them, you really are uninformed
Except that he's not.And I don’t hate Trump, I just dislike the way he is fucking up the country for his own personal gain, and no where does it say the Chief Executive reigns with absolute power
Can lead a horse to water but you can’t make it ………..Ah, I'm uninformed because I correctly stated that the president is the Chief Executive and hires and fires these people, as you confirmed.
LOL - do you read the tripe you post before hitting enter?
![]()
You are consumed with your hatred and rage. Hatred of Trump dominates every post you make on this board.
Trump is president, get over it.
Were you Stalinists REALLY expecting the SCOTUS to somehow rule that Trump is somehow not allowed to act with the power of the office he was elected to? Did you expect them to remove him and put Obama back in charge?
Well, that was the law established by Congress prior to his SCOTUS once again telling him he can do anything he wants, and at least four times I have explained and documented how Congress has this authority, can’t help those that don’t take the time toSoooo, the executive can appoint, but not fire? Still waiting for you to explain how Congress has this authority.
Except that he's not.
You never explained how Congress has the authority, even though I have asked you multiple times. You posted some references to articles and clauses, but never showed, using the actual verbiage, how these articles and clauses empower Congress to create independent Federal agencies. Stop being so dishonest.Well, that was the law established by Congress prior to his SCOTUS once again telling him he can do anything he wants, and at least four times I have explained and documented how Congress has this authority, can’t help those that don’t take the time to
process
So first what I offered was propaganda, but now it just wasn’t direct enough, in fact, both offered an exact explanation where the authority comes from even citing specific references in the ConstitutionYou never explained how Congress has the authority, even though I have asked you multiple times. You posted some references to articles and clauses, but never showed, using the actual verbiage, how these articles and clauses empower Congress to create independent Federal agencies. Stop being so dishonest.
Never said Trump wasn’t President,
Once again, never said Trump wasn’t President, nor “melting down,” in fact, having laughs reading your attempts to save face on a topic you been caught uninformedYet here you are melting down because SCOTUS confirmed that he has the same authority as every other president in history and can fire those who report to him.
"Melting down" is the correct term for what you and the other Stalinists are doing because SCOTUS said "well DUH, of course he can fire those who report to him."Once again, never said Trump wasn’t President, nor “melting down,” in fact, having laughs reading your attempts to save face on a topic you been caught uninformed
Oh, and uniformed about what, exactly?Once again, never said Trump wasn’t President, nor “melting down,” in fact, having laughs reading your attempts to save face on a topic you been caught uninformed
Just about everythingOh, and uniformed about what, exactly?
Be specific.
So you got nailed for your ignorance and are throwing a tantrum.Just about everything
The fact the Fed, FTC, SEC, SSA, nearly all the alphabet are independent agencies established by Congress, and the President can appoint the chairman of all of them,Oh, and uniformed about what, exactly?
Be specific.
So when you claimed Trump had no right to fire the chairman of the FTC, you knew you were outright lying.The fact the Fed, FTC, SEC, SSA, nearly all the alphabet are independent agencies established by Congress, and the President can appoint the chairman of all of them,
Never said Trump couldn’t fire the FTC chairman, you are lying againSo when you claimed Trump had no right to fire the chairman of the FTC, you knew you were outright lying.
Good to know.
You poor fools have to go back 100 years to find any Democrat that has an association with the Nazi meanwhile you guys are slow dancing with Nazis now.You can rant about Trump. But you and all democrats need to stop with the Nazi and KKK references. It just makes you look stupid. For example, JFK's father was a Nazi sympathizer. As a democrat appointed U.S. Ambassador! He actually had secret meetings with Nazis. And he hated Jews of course. U.S. democrats Senators and congressman were confirmed propagandists for the Nazis. And of course today all of you democrats are flocking around a Senatorial candidate Graham Platner who is a genuine Nazi. As far as the KKK and all the democrat politicians associated with that organization, the list is very, very long. And as you well know it was democrats who founded the KKK and kept electing them. So take a look at the party past and present who actually supported the KKK and Nazis. And who still do. Thanks.
Just wait until there's a Democratic president then your tiny bowels will be an uproar too you poor fool. You poor trumptards think you're going to be in power forever lol.A day ago, the alt lefties were praising the SC decisions. One goes against them, and they all get their bowels in an uproar.