Archaeology of the New Testament

[Into the Night]

That's really funny that you are so impressed with the content, information, organization, and lexicon of my posts you just assume it could only conceivably have come from artificial intelligence and sophisticated computer software.

It did.

The only time I have ever had to bring in outside corroborating sources is when you nincompoops howl that what I have written in a post is wrong.

What you have written is wrong. I've already described how.

Once you get in the habit of just accepting what I write about physics

You are denying theories of science (including physics).

and astronomy is generally correct

It isn't.

then I will have no need to find an independent source which corroborates what I have written.

Pleading fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

You cannot blame me for a loss of context when there was no context lost.

Your moronic posts will continue to get the moronic response they deserve.

No context. Void argument fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Finkle isn't Einhorn.

Oh wait... Finkle IS Einhorn.

YARP

 

[Into the Night]

Physics isn't subject to opinion here,

You aren't discussing physics.

I can only talk about electromagnetism and the theory of general relativity based on what I learned in the classroom or from text books.

There is no such thing as 'electromagnetism'.
The Theory of Relativity does not discuss magnets.

If the mouth breathers on the board don't want to believe what I write, then they're going to have to expect the appearance of an independent source corroborating what I wrote.

AI is not a source. False authority fallacy.
You didn't write it. Cut and pasting isn't writing.

 

[Jerry Mathers]

There is no absolute 'stationary'. You are ignoring the Theory of Relativity again.

Inversion fallacy.

Void argument fallacy.

Random words and phrases. No apparent coherency.

Try English. It works better.

all of you are retarded.

so dumb and so gay.

 

[Jerry Mathers]

stationary /stā′shə-nĕr″ē/

adjective​

1. Not moving.​
2. Not capable of being moved; fixed.​
3. Unchanging.
   
   "a stationary sound."​

​

 

[Jerry Mathers]

satanic neoconism has made all of you retarded.

 

[Cypress]

I am usually so disappointed with the content, information and lexicon of your posts because I can tell immediately that you are copy-pasting the errors regurgitated by an AI app trained with common misconceptions.


You only copy-paste from AI-apps and error-filled online websites, ensuring you always include all the errors.


Once you post something that is actually correct, without including all the common errors, I'll start giving you credit for making valid contributions.

It's obvious that you have never set one toe inside a high school or college introductory physics class.

You're never going to really learn physics in any adequate way by frantically Googling your way around the interweb. You are going to have to do the hard work of enrolling in classes and having your progress tested.

 

[Cypress]

There is no 'type of' acceleration. There is simply acceleration!

There is constant acceleration, non-constant acceleration, angular acceleration.
The reason we have calculus is because not all acceleration is constant acceleration.

...a vector scalar!

Now you're getting confused and just copying words you found when googling.
A vector and a scalar are not at all the same thing. A scalar has magnitude but no directional component. A vector field has both magnitude and direction. Classical gravity is a vector field, but in Einstein's General Relatively it technically becomes a tensor field.

 

[Melchizedek=Tecumseh]

Cypress does not believe the Bible.

I don't think he believes or doesn't believe the Bible, he seems to be waiting for an Epiphany!

 

[Into the Night]

all of you are retarded.

so dumb and so gay.

Elitism. Mantra 1a. Lame.

 

[Into the Night]

stationary /stā′shə-nĕr″ē/

adjective​

1. Not moving.​
2. Not capable of being moved; fixed.​
3. Unchanging.
   
   "a stationary sound."​

​

Yet another example of thinking a dictionary is science. There is no absolute 'stationary', NoName. You are still ignoring the Theory of Relativity.

 

[Into the Night]

satanic neoconism has made all of you retarded.

Try English.

 

[Into the Night]

It's obvious that you have never set one toe inside a high school or college introductory physics class.

You're never going to really learn physics in any adequate way by frantically Googling your way around the interweb. You are going to have to do the hard work of enrolling in classes and having your progress tested.

Science is not a high school.
Science is not a class.
Science is not Google.
Science is not AI.
You are still trying to discard the Theory of Relativity.
You are still trying to discard Ohm's Law.
You are still trying to discard the work of Michael Faraday.

The Universe is not a school.
The Universe is not a class.
The Universe is not Google.
The Universe is not AI.
The Universe is not any theory of science.
The Universe is not a field.
The Universe is not electricity.

The Universe is unorganized.

 

[Into the Night]

There is constant acceleration, non-constant acceleration, angular acceleration.

Nope. There is only 'acceleration'.
Acceleration is not a constant.
Acceleration is does not have to change.
Acceleration is not an angle.

The reason we have calculus is because not all acceleration is constant acceleration.

Acceleration is not calculus.

Now you're getting confused and just copying words you found when googling.

Inversion fallacy.

A vector and a scalar are not at all the same thing.

Never said they were. A vector scalar, however, does exist. Force is a vector scalar, and so is acceleration. Mass is a base scalar.

A scalar has magnitude but no directional component.

It can certainly have a directional component. This is a vector scalar.

A vector field has both magnitude and direction.

A vector is not a field.

Classical gravity is a vector field, but in Einstein's General Relatively it technically becomes a tensor field.

'Classical gravity'...is that a new rock band?
A vector is not a field.
A tensor is not a field.
Obviously, you have no idea what a 'tensor' is.
You deny mathematics just as much as you deny science and just as much as you deny logic.

 

[Into the Night]

I don't think he believes or doesn't believe the Bible, he seems to be waiting for an Epiphany!

He has stated that he does not believe the Bible.

 

[Jerry Mathers]

if general relativity denies objects at rest exist then it's retarded.

 

[Cypress]

It can certainly have a directional component.

Don't take my word for it ...

"A scalar is a quantity that is fully described by its magnitude (a numerical value) without any specific direction. Common examples include mass, temperature, volume, time, and speed. This contrasts with vectors, which require both magnitude and direction (e.g., velocity or force).'

~AI Overview​

'Classical gravity'...is that a new rock band?

classical physics includes Newtonian gravity

 

[Cypress]

He has stated that he does not believe the Bible.

Wrong. I 100 percent believe in the Bible. It has been confirmed to be faithfully transmitted to us after two thousand years in something approximating it's original authentic literary form.

That is a real, authentic literary work.

But that's the wrong question. I don't believe it's a pack of lies like many militant atheists do, nor do I believe it is supposed to be treated on the whole as literal history like the fundys do.

 

[Jerry Mathers]

Wrong. I 100 percent believe in the Bible. It has been confirmed to be faithfully transmitted to us after two thousand years in something approximating it's original authentic literary form.

That is a real, authentic literary work.

But that's the wrong question. I don't believe it's a pack of lies like many militant atheists do, nor do I believe it is supposed to be treated on the whole as literal history like the fundys do.

you're a fucking idiot.