Archaeology of the New Testament

[Into the Night]

Gravity is an acceleration of matter and energy moving along geodesics in curved spacetime, according to Einstein.

There is no gravity in Einstein's equations.
Gravity is not acceleration.
Gravity is not space.
Gravity is not time.

Isaac Newton thought it was an acceleration caused by some type of attractive force reaching out and acting over a distance.

Gravity is not acceleration.
Gravity has no arms.

Einstein's theory was a paradigm shift in how we think about this field of acceleration that every human, animal, planet, and asteroid 'feels'.

Acceleration is not a field.
A planet is not sentient.
An asteroid is not sentient.
Einstein is not describing 'feelings'.

 

[Into the Night]

"Gravity involves acceleration because it is a geometric curvature in spacetime that causes an object's velocity to change."

~AI overview​

Planets and moons aren't being "held in place".

There is no absolute stationary.

Orbits are a motion of acceleration. Any kind of curved motion or change of direction (orbital elliptical motion, parabolic motion, circular motion) is a type of acceleration.

There is no 'type of' acceleration. There is simply acceleration...a vector scalar.
A point on the rim of a bicycle wheel changes direction as the wheel rotates, even when acceleration is zero.

 

[Into the Night]

Newton spoke in terms of "gravity", that it is a force that accelerates mass.

Exactly. F=mA, probably the most important equation in science.

Einstein's General Relativity has no gravity, i.e. no force that accelerates mass.

Quite right. Thank you.

The curvature of spacetime tells matter how to move.

If you are using the term gravity, you must apply Newtonian mechanics. It is inappropriate/incorrect to mix gravity and Relativity.

He does seem to confuse a lot.

He doesn't know what gravity is.
He doesn't know what electricity is.
He doesn't know what quantum mechanics is.
He doesn't know what 'acceleration' is.

To him, everything is a magick 'field', and he uses that to try to prove his religion True.
All these side trips through is terrible understanding of physics goes back to his original argument:

The the Universe is somehow 'created' by a God that exists before the Universe provides a place for Him to exist in.

In other words, he's stuck in a paradox. His many wacky side trips through his bad physics is just trying to justify this paradox.

 

[Into the Night]

"Gravity is an acceleration. Specifically, in physics, it is the rate at which objects speed up as they fall toward a massive body, like the Earth."

Gravity is not acceleration.

~ AI overview​

AI is wrong yet again. Don't try to substitute your brain for AI, Zombie.

"Einstein’s ground-breaking realization was that gravity is indistinguishable from, and in fact the same thing as, acceleration, an idea he called the “principle of equivalence”."

~ https://www.physicsoftheuniverse.com/topics_relativity_gravity.html​

Gravity is not acceleration.
False equivalence fallacy.
Misquoting. Mantra 30a.
False authority fallacies.
Science is not a website.
Science is not AI slop.

The Universe is not gravity.
The Universe is not Einstein.
The Universe is not an acceleration.

The Universe is unorganized.

 

[IBDaMann]

Christianity is one of the only religions that is fundamentally based on historical claims.

Christianity is based on claims, yes, but you have already admitted that none of those claims are historical. In fact, you have gone so far as to insist that Alexander the Great was equally "not historical" except that you neglected to take all the first-hand accounts ... into account.

If it's not historically true that Jesus of Nazareth ministered, died, and was resurrected, then Christianity as a religion is a farce.

So here we have your error fully revealed. @Jerry Mathers is correct, i.e. that you don't understand what religion is. You falsify your own religion whenever you try to portray it as thettled thienth; by doing so you invite the scrutiny of the scientific method, and your faith can't hold up. This is the same problem with your Climate faith, i.e. you insist that it is thettled thienth and just like that, it's falsified right out of the starting gate.

The Christianity of those Christians who do not insist that their faith is somehow thettled thienth but is, in fact, completely a matter of faith, remains unsullied and unassailed. Why you work so hard to render your faith FALSE is a mystery.

 

[Melchizedek=Tecumseh]

Name something that gravity by itself causes to be stationary and immobile.

Congress?

 

[IBDaMann]

He does seem to confuse a lot.

Cypress does nothing more than copy-paste straight from an AI app. He is embarrassed to admit that he does so, mostly because he has invested so much effort into insisting that everything he posts comes directly from his studies, of great books and "college courses". Like most leftists, he peppers his posts with "credential-hinting" and "dead man name-dropping", (I call it "leftist credential-signaling") that is intended to convince other leftists to OBEY his commands of what to believe; after all, that is what works on leftists, just as it worked on Cypress.

Otherwise, Cypress doesn't know how to get around rational adults who actually understand the subject matter. Everything he copy-pastes is unreviewed because he doesn't understand what he is reading/copying, so he can't call booooooolsch't on any errors; in fact, he doesn't even recognize any errors when he sees them, so all errors, obvious and otherwise, are copy-pasted. When someone such as myself reads what he copy-pastes, the errors he includes are as obvious as shit on satin sheets, except that he can't see any errors whatsoever.

But then you'll notice that time and time again, whenever I or anyone else tries to help him by pointing out one or more of the errors he copy-pasted, Cypress kicks into a death-struggle to say that what he copy-pasted is correct, and that he learned it all in college.

He still doesn't even know what science is.

He doesn't know what gravity is.
He doesn't know what electricity is.
He doesn't know what quantum mechanics is.
He doesn't know what 'acceleration' is.

He doesn't understand what a logical contradiction is.

To him, everything is a magick 'field', and he uses that to try to prove his religion True.

That's the main issue. Whereas you are comfortable with your faith, he doesn't believe his at all, and must constantly strive to convince himself that his Christianity is thettled thienth. You'll notice his comment that if Christianity isn't thettled thienth then it is a farce. Talk about a faith being on terribly thin ice.

All these side trips through is terrible understanding of physics goes back to his original argument:
The the Universe is somehow 'created' by a God that exists before the Universe provides a place for Him to exist in.
In other words, he's stuck in a paradox. His many wacky side trips through his bad physics is just trying to justify this paradox.

I gather that he doesn't subscribe to the continuum theory. In fact, I'm not sure he can effectively subscribe to any theory that doesn't call itself "science."

 

[IBDaMann]

but there are stationary items in gravitational fields.

Not in General Relativity.

 

[Jerry Mathers]

Why you work so hard to render your faith FALSE is a mystery.

Not really. Hes a Masonic satanist on a mission to destroy all goodness.

 

[Jerry Mathers]

Not in General Relativity.

You too are playing dumb games, going all in on destroying the concept of stationary.

You're both obvious dumb and general relativity must be a retard concept.

You're destroying you're faith too.

Are you a disruptor and change agent dum dum?

 

[Cypress]

Cypress does nothing more than copy-paste straight from an AI app!

That's really funny that you are so impressed with the content, information, organization, and lexicon of my posts you just assume it could only conceivably have come from artificial intelligence and sophisticated computer software.

The only time I have ever had to bring in outside corroborating sources is when you nincompoops howl that what I have written in a post is wrong.

Once you get in the habit of just accepting what I write about physics and astronomy is generally correct then I will have no need to find an independent source which corroborates what I have written.

 

[IBDaMann]

That's really funny that you are so impressed with the content, information, and lexicon of my posts you just assume it could only conceivably have come from artificial intelligence and sophisticated computer software.

I am usually so disappointed with the content, information and lexicon of your posts because I can tell immediately that you are copy-pasting the errors regurgitated by an AI app trained with common misconceptions.

The only time I have ever had to bring in outside corroborating sources is when you nincompoops howl that what I have written in a post is wrong.

You only copy-paste from AI-apps and error-filled online websites, ensuring you always include all the errors.

Once you get in the habit of just accepting what I write about physics and astronomy is generally correct then I will have no need to find an independent source which corroborates what I have written.

Once you post something that is actually correct, without including all the common errors, I'll start giving you credit for making valid contributions.

 

[Melchizedek=Tecumseh]

That's really funny that you are so impressed with the content, information, organization, and lexicon of my posts you just assume it could only conceivably have come from artificial intelligence and sophisticated computer software.

The only time I have ever had to bring in outside corroborating sources is when you nincompoops howl that what I have written in a post is wrong.

Once you get in the habit of just accepting what I write about physics and astronomy is generally correct then I will have no need to find an independent source which corroborates what I have written.

You shy away from giving your view,and deflection to academia a lot.
Once I awhile give your unvarnished pov! Even if that pov on a subject is IDK!

 

[ZenMode]

YARP. You cannot blame your loss of context on me or anybody else, Void.

You cannot blame me for a loss of context when there was no context lost.

Your moronic posts will continue to get the moronic response they deserve.

 

[ZenMode]

A particle is not electricity.
Science is not a high school.
Science is not a class.

The Universe is not a particle.
The Universe is not a charge.
The Universe is not a field.
The Universe is not electricity.
The Universe is not a school or class.

The Universe is unorganized.

Finkle isn't Einhorn.

Oh wait... Finkle IS Einhorn.

 

[Cypress]

You shy away from giving your view,and deflection to academia a lot.
Once I awhile give your unvarnished pov! Even if that pov on a subject is IDK!

Physics isn't subject to opinion here, I can only talk about electromagnetism and the theory of general relativity based on what I learned in the classroom or from text books.

If the mouth breathers on the board don't want to believe what I write, then they're going to have to expect the appearance of an independent source corroborating what I wrote.

 

[Into the Night]

Christianity is based on claims, yes, but you have already admitted that none of those claims are historical. In fact, you have gone so far as to insist that Alexander the Great was equally "not historical" except that you neglected to take all the first-hand accounts ... into account.


So here we have your error fully revealed. @Jerry Mathers is correct, i.e. that you don't understand what religion is. You falsify your own religion whenever you try to portray it as thettled thienth; by doing so you invite the scrutiny of the scientific method, and your faith can't hold up. This is the same problem with your Climate faith, i.e. you insist that it is thettled thienth and just like that, it's falsified right out of the starting gate.

The Christianity of those Christians who do not insist that their faith is somehow thettled thienth but is, in fact, completely a matter of faith, remains unsullied and unassailed. Why you work so hard to render your faith FALSE is a mystery.

Cypress does not believe the Bible.

 

[Into the Night]

Cypress does nothing more than copy-paste straight from an AI app. He is embarrassed to admit that he does so, mostly because he has invested so much effort into insisting that everything he posts comes directly from his studies, of great books and "college courses". Like most leftists, he peppers his posts with "credential-hinting" and "dead man name-dropping", (I call it "leftist credential-signaling") that is intended to convince other leftists to OBEY his commands of what to believe; after all, that is what works on leftists, just as it worked on Cypress.

Otherwise, Cypress doesn't know how to get around rational adults who actually understand the subject matter. Everything he copy-pastes is unreviewed because he doesn't understand what he is reading/copying, so he can't call booooooolsch't on any errors; in fact, he doesn't even recognize any errors when he sees them, so all errors, obvious and otherwise, are copy-pasted. When someone such as myself reads what he copy-pastes, the errors he includes are as obvious as shit on satin sheets, except that he can't see any errors whatsoever.

But then you'll notice that time and time again, whenever I or anyone else tries to help him by pointing out one or more of the errors he copy-pasted, Cypress kicks into a death-struggle to say that what he copy-pasted is correct, and that he learned it all in college.

He still doesn't even know what science is.


He doesn't understand what a logical contradiction is.


That's the main issue. Whereas you are comfortable with your faith, he doesn't believe his at all, and must constantly strive to convince himself that his Christianity is thettled thienth. You'll notice his comment that if Christianity isn't thettled thienth then it is a farce. Talk about a faith being on terribly thin ice.

Since he doesn't even believe the Bible, can you call his religion 'Christianity'?

I gather that he doesn't subscribe to the continuum theory.

Obviously not.

In fact, I'm not sure he can effectively subscribe to any theory that doesn't call itself "science."

He's already rejected several theories of science.
He thinks AI is 'science', as you described.

 

[Into the Night]

Not really. Hes a Masonic satanist on a mission to destroy all goodness.

Masons do not worship Satan, NoName.

 

[Into the Night]

You too are playing dumb games, going all in on destroying the concept of stationary.

There is no absolute 'stationary'. You are ignoring the Theory of Relativity again.

You're both obvious dumb and general relativity must be a retard concept.

Inversion fallacy.

You're destroying you're faith too.

Void argument fallacy.

Are you a disruptor and change agent dum dum?

Random words and phrases. No apparent coherency.

Try English. It works better.