The most secure election ever and other lies.

QP! said:
And by Trumps own Administration who studied this looking for proof of interference and manipulation.

-------

The Landmark CISA / DHS Statement
On November 12, 2020, CISA and its coordinating election security partners released a highly publicized joint statement. The most famous and definitive quotes from that assessment include: [1]
  • On Overall Security:

    [1]
  • On System Manipulation:

    [1]
  • On Public Confidence:

    [1, 2, 3]
Key Quotes from Top Trump Administration Officials
In addition to the official agency press release, top leadership appointed by Trump within these departments echoed these findings:


Christopher Krebs (Director of CISA, appointed by Trump):
Shortly before being dismissed by the President for defending the vote's integrity, Krebs famously summarized the security efforts via social media:

Following his termination, Krebs stood by the agency's findings, tweeting:

[1, 2, 3]


Chad Wolf (Acting Secretary of Homeland Security):
On Election Day itself, Wolf publicly praised the cybersecurity infrastructure put in place by the administration, stating:



William Barr (Department of Justice / Attorney General):
While the Department of Justice is a distinct cabinet department from DHS, Trump’s own Attorney General explicitly commented on the administration's investigative findings into potential fraud during a December 2020 interview:


----------

Outside of Trumps Administration above, Trump also engaged many private groups to investigate...

Several private research firms and partisan groups were hired or commissioned by Donald Trump’s campaign and his allies to find evidence of widespread voter fraud. [1, 2]
The most prominent groups included Cyber Ninjas, the Berkeley Research Group (BRG), and Simpatico Software Systems.

None of these groups found evidence of large-scale voter fraud that would have changed the election outcome. [, 2, 3, 4]

1. Cyber Ninjas (Arizona State Senate Audit)
Cyber Ninjas, a Florida-based cybersecurity firm with no prior election-auditing experience, was hired by Arizona Senate Republicans to conduct a hand recount and forensic audit of 2.1 million ballots in Maricopa County. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
  • The Key Finding: Their final report confirmed Joe Biden’s victory in Maricopa County. In fact, their hand count found that Biden gained 99 votes and Trump lost 261 votes compared to the official certified results. [1, 2]
  • The Quote: In the draft report delivered to the Arizona State Senate, the executive summary concluded:

    [1]

2. Berkeley Research Group (BRG)
The Trump campaign paid the Berkeley Research Group roughly $600,000 to analyze voter data in swing states for anomalies like dead or double voters. [1, 2]
  • The Key Finding: Their analysis found only minor, routine discrepancies that were statistically insignificant and did not alter the election outcome. The campaign did not release the final report. []
  • The Quote: According to summaries of the findings, the researchers:

    []

3. Simpatico Software Systems
Expert Ken Block, representing Simpatico Software Systems, was hired to scrutinize fraud claims for the campaign. [1, 2, 3]
  • The Key Finding: Block found no evidence of large-scale fraud, directly informing White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows that the allegations were false. [1]
  • [1]
  • The Quote: In public statements, Block noted that data showed:

    [1]
Click to expand...
Our resident Maga mooks are just following the lead of their Cheeto Jeezus and acolytes ... lie, deny, repeat.

Pity for them over 70% of the country isn't buying it.
 
FastLane said:
So we all knew 2020 was not a secure election. The evidence reveals that Communist China did not want Trump to win in 2020. China hacked our election voter roles. The Dems still want to allow for fraudulent elections. Providing proof of citizenship and a photo ID is a reasonable step to reduce cheating . But of course Democrats don't want voter ID.
Click to expand...

How does voter ID stop China from hacking, if the latter is the big problem?
 
Phantasmal said:
The election was safe, proven by numerous lawsuits and recounts. The interference by foreign countries had no effect on the vote count.
Click to expand...
Most of the lawsuits were dismissed for lack of standing. You don't know if countries had any effect or not. China hacked our voter roles for SOME reason. Plus over 250,000 illegal aliens on voter roles in just 4 states is a real problem.
 
BartenderElite said:
How does voter ID stop China from hacking, if the latter is the big problem?
Click to expand...
How do you know for sure China did not hack the voting machine voter totals. Voter registration information could be used to add fictitious voters in districts where they were need.
 
FastLane said:
Most of the lawsuits were dismissed for lack of standing. You don't know if countries had any effect or not. China hacked our voter roles for SOME reason. Plus over 250,000 illegal aliens on voter roles in just 4 states is a real problem.
Click to expand...
Numerous audits prove you are wrong. The interference was through media saturation perpetrated by foreign bots. mostly Russia.

Republican studies show that very few illegals have voted over the last 40 years. DonOld’s own commissions found no voter fraud

You deny the evidence that shows our elections are safe and illegals don’t vote.

Being on the rolls, doesn’t equate to them voting.
 
HNemnWsXQAAfj-N
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
50% of Americans do NOT have a passport so never had to prove their citizenship.

This is about proving citizenship. Stating you are a US citizen is all that is required for an I9. You don't have to prove it by providing a birth certificate.

Thanks for confirming it doesn't prove citizenship.

Contractors don't have to provide a birth certificate to get their contractors license. How are you so ignorant that you think the have to? I doubt architects and doctors do either.

They may ask for your birth certificate but they only require proof of age if it isn't established already in their records. They accept many things other than a birth certificate.
Click to expand...
Apparently Democrats are just too stupid to be able to get a photo ID.
 
FastLane said:
Apparently Democrats are just too stupid to be able to get a photo ID.
Click to expand...
Apparently you are too stupid to understand a law that requires a poll tax is illegal under the US Constitution.
The requirement under the SAVE act isn't to just show an ID. It restricts what IDs can be used and requires proof of citizenship to register. Everyone will have to register to vote again since they didn't prove they were citizens when they first registered. Then every time you move to a new address you will have to prove you are a citizen all over again in order to register to vote at the new address. Getting a certified birth certificate is not free.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
It seems it is YOU that can't read. I could provide a state census record and a vaccination record to fulfill the requirement.

If we ask for proof of your age, you must show us a birth certificate or religious record showing your age that was made before you were age 5 if one was established. This is our preferred proof of age.





If a public or religious record was not made before you were age 5, you must show us at least two other documents you may have that prove your age, such as a:





  • birth certificate recorded after you were age 5,
  • school record,
  • State census record,
  • vaccination record,
  • insurance policy,
  • hospital admission record, etc.



And there you go proving you are an idiot. You claimed one had to provide proof they were a citizen in order to get a job. Now you are admitting that non-citizens can not only get jobs but can have SS numbers.
Click to expand...
Birth certified recorded after you were 5. As I said, you are a dunce. A typical uneducated, loudmouth, dumb fuck democrat. AND you do HAVE to show proof of US citizenship to get your Masters license. Fucking dunce.
 
Last edited:
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Apparently you are too stupid to understand a law that requires a poll tax is illegal under the US Constitution.
The requirement under the SAVE act isn't to just show an ID. It restricts what IDs can be used and requires proof of citizenship to register. Everyone will have to register to vote again since they didn't prove they were citizens when they first registered. Then every time you move to a new address you will have to prove you are a citizen all over again in order to register to vote at the new address. Getting a certified birth certificate is not free.
Click to expand...
Apparently Democrats are too stupid to keep track of their birth certificat.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top