False, you may be too dumb to understand the difference between a “term of art” and a common definition, but I’m not.The testimony can be anything one wishes to dream up. The jury found otherwise.
Do better.
Last edited:
False, you may be too dumb to understand the difference between a “term of art” and a common definition, but I’m not.The testimony can be anything one wishes to dream up. The jury found otherwise.
Do better.
The jury found otherwise.Look up how the judge defined sexual assault for the jury, it was, inserting anything into her vagina against her will…. AKA rape.
NopeLiar.
yes, he was not criminally convicted of rape.The jury found otherwise.
Don't give up your phone bank career.
Executive summary
Donald Trump has not been criminally convicted of sexual assault or rape in the sources provided, but a New York jury found him civilly liable for sexually abusing writer E. Jean Carroll and ordered $5 million in damages; that civil verdict was upheld by a federal appeals court on December 30, 2024 [1] [2]. Multiple outlets and timelines catalog at least two dozen women who have accused Trump of sexual assault or harassment over decades, and reporting shows civil judgments and large defamation awards tied to those allegations [3] [4]
You may be “too” dumb to determine when to use “too” and “to” but most people aren’t.False, you may be to dumb to understand the difference between a “term of art” and a common definition, but I’m not.
Was Trump found liable for raping E Jean Carrol?The jury found otherwise.
Don't give up your phone bank career.
Executive summary
Donald Trump has not been criminally convicted of sexual assault or rape in the sources provided, but a New York jury found him civilly liable for sexually abusing writer E. Jean Carroll and ordered $5 million in damages; that civil verdict was upheld by a federal appeals court on December 30, 2024 [1] [2]. Multiple outlets and timelines catalog at least two dozen women who have accused Trump of sexual assault or harassment over decades, and reporting shows civil judgments and large defamation awards tied to those allegations [3] [4]
Nope
yes, he was not criminally convicted of rape.
I don't need to ask anyone anything. The jury settled the matter.Ask your IA, if NY “sexual assault” is the same thing as rape…. Let me know! Show your question, and the answer.
LiarWas Trump found liable for raping E Jean Carrol?
yes — and the distinction turns on New York’s statutory definitions.
In May 2023, the jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse, awarding Carroll roughly $2 million on the battery claim and $3 million for defamation — Under New York Penal Law, “rape” is narrowly defined as forcible penile penetration. The jury found he forcibly penetrated her digitally, which falls under “sexual abuse” in the statute. Judge Lewis Kaplan later addressed this directly in a post-trial ruling, writing that the jury’s finding meant Trump “raped” Carroll as that word is commonly understood — the verdict was not a finding that nothing happened, but a function of the statute’s unusually narrow definition. Notably, New York amended that definition in 2024 to include other forms of penetration.
Claud AI!
AKA the court found he forced his fingers into her vagina.
That might not be rape to Trumppers, but it is to me.
And it was rape by Federal gov't and most other State statutes at the time. NYS had an old outdated law which was not revised as most others were but is revised now. That is why the Judge made his ruling after that it was 'rape' and there was no real difference to distinguish otherwise.Was Trump found liable for raping E Jean Carrol?
yes — and the distinction turns on New York’s statutory definitions.
In May 2023, the jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse, awarding Carroll roughly $2 million on the battery claim and $3 million for defamation — Under New York Penal Law, “rape” is narrowly defined as forcible penile penetration. The jury found he forcibly penetrated her digitally, which falls under “sexual abuse” in the statute. Judge Lewis Kaplan later addressed this directly in a post-trial ruling, writing that the jury’s finding meant Trump “raped” Carroll as that word is commonly understood — the verdict was not a finding that nothing happened, but a function of the statute’s unusually narrow definition. Notably, New York amended that definition in 2024 to include other forms of penetration.
Claud AI!
AKA the court found he forced his fingers into her vagina.
That might not be rape to Trumppers, but it is to me.
I never said he was convicted, are you that illiterate?Finally, you admit Trump was not convicted of rape.
I don't need to ask anyone anything. The jury settled the matter.
Trump was not convicted of rape.
Now you can stop wishing.
Now you can stop lying.
And it’s Rape!And it was rape by Federal gov't and most other State statutes at the time. NYS had an old outdated law which was not revised as most others were but is revised now. That is why the Judge made his ruling after that it was 'rape' and there was no real difference to distinguish otherwise.
Trump himself bragged about grabbing women by the pussy without consent as his go to move. It is EXACTLY what he did to E Jean.
And?The so-called “sexual assault” was so important to the gold-digger that she could not recall the year that it happened.
And it was rape by Federal gov't and most other State statutes at the time. NYS had an old outdated law which was not revised as most others were but is revised now. That is why the Judge made his ruling after that it was 'rape' and there was no real difference to distinguish otherwise.
Trump himself bragged about grabbing women by the pussy without consent as his go to move. It is EXACTLY what he did to E Jean.

Who was talking to you?I never said he was convicted, are you that illiterate?
Argument from randU fallacy. Made up numbers are not data, Phanty.61% of rape victims do not report their rape.
Psychoquackery.Do your research on rape and recall, memory loss is a real thing that happens to rape victims.
RQAA.As to your other claims in this meme, please provide evidence.
Attempted negative proof fallacy.No, again you provide no evidence
Argument from randU fallacy. Made up numbers are not data.and again, a majority of women never report their rape.
None. You cannot defend a kangaroo court.A jury and several judges have found her believable.
Inversion fallacy.What you post is just a lot of![]()
What 'assault'??Cope!
A jury and several judges believe E. Jean. I do as well because she is not the only one DonOld has assaulted.
I believe the women.
I am not you.Don't project, Larry. It just makes you look silly.
What 'trauma', Kewpie?And?
Do you think clear memory of events is the norm after any big trauma?
LIF. Grow up.You always project your dishonesty onto others.