Archaeology of the New Testament

[IBDaMann]

Yes! He meant God doesn't play dice with the Universe!

I knew you had no idea.

 

[IBDaMann]

its just a theory.

Have you found any errors?

 

[Jerry Mathers]

Have you found any errors?

ok. nothing is stationary. brilliant.

not.

 

[ZenMode]

You believe that CO2 brings bad luck to whatever climate you're in.

I don't believe that CO2 brings luck.

 

[IBDaMann]

ok. nothing is stationary. brilliant.

Are you aware of anything that is stationary?

What is obvious is that "stationary" is meant in an absolute sense, while you are assuming a relative sense.

 

[IBDaMann]

I don't believe that CO2 brings luck.

You don't call it "luck". You have your own vocabulary to address the magical superpowers you believe CO2 to have.

 

[Jerry Mathers]

Are you aware of anything that is stationary?

What is obvious is that "stationary" is meant in an absolute sense, while you are assuming a relative sense.

objects at rest, tend to stay at rest, objects in motion tend to stay in motion.

you deny science, bitchtard.

 

[Into the Night]

Your too dumb to recognize sarcasm. Not surprising.

Hey...it's YOUR god.

Your too much of a liar admit I'm atheist.

You are not an atheist. You are a religious fundamentalist.

The sun warms the earth. Fail.

But carbon dioxide cannot.

Liar.

DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

I believe that a cloth/paper mask will stop some amount of water vapor that is exhaled. That is a fact, which is why the mask gets damp.

It does not stop water vapor either. A virus is not water vapor, Void.

That sounds you hear is reality slapping you in the face.

Buzzword fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.

I have no religion.

Yes you do. You are a fundamentalist.

Not believing in astrology isn't a religion.

I never said you believed in astrology. Strawman fallacy.

Not believing in alchemy isn't religion.

I never said you believed in alchemy. Strawman fallacy.

Not believing in the gods of Christianity, Islam, etc isn't religion.

But your religions ARE a religions.

 

[Into the Night]

its just a theory.

It happens to be a theory of science.
You just want to discard it.

 

[Into the Night]

Over your head!

Inversion fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

objects at rest, tend to stay at rest, objects in motion tend to stay in motion.

you deny science, bitchtard.

There is no absolute 'stationary', NoName. You are still ignoring the Theory of Relativity.

 

[Into the Night]

ok. nothing is stationary. brilliant.

not.

Not an error. Try again.

 

[Into the Night]

objects at rest, tend to stay at rest, objects in motion tend to stay in motion.

Do you know what this means, NoName?

you deny science, bitchtard.

Inversion fallacy. It is YOU denying a theory of science.

 

[Jerry Mathers]

Do you know what this means, NoName?

Inversion fallacy. It is YOU denying a theory of science.

you don't.

science acknowledges objects being at rest.

Call me a fig Newton, I don't care.

you people are high on dumb juice.

 

[Cypress]

Yep, for as long as man has existed, he's been suspeptible to superstition.

Einstein is using abductive logic, not superstition. Either the order and rationality Einstein saw in the laws of nature are a random chance result of inanimate and irrational processes -- or their not.

 

[Jerry Mathers]

Einstein is using abductive logic, not superstition. Either the order and rationality Einstein saw in the laws of nature are a random chance result of inanimate and irrational processes -- or their not.

false dichotomy fallacy.

 

[Cypress]

I feel sorry for you. The only way you can cope is to pretend to speak for others!

I love how militant atheists start slowly backing away from the label atheist when one starts asking probing questions about the atheist worldview.

 

[Cypress]

false dichotomy fallacy.

Feel free to explain a third option for the origin of the rational laws of nature, besides them having either a rational cause, or an irrational cause.

 

[Jerry Mathers]

Feel free to explain a third option for the origin of the rational laws of nature, besides them having either a rational cause, or an irrational cause.

option c unknown.

 

[Cypress]

option c unknown.

In other words, you can't even think of any third option other than either a rational cause, or an irrational cause for the rational laws of nature.