Archaeology of the New Testament

[IBDaMann]

Now you are resorting to just being disparaging.

He's not the one referring to humans as "meat robots".

We know that an immaterial reality exists

Too funny! So this is "what we know"? Who confirmed this unconfirmable thing? Way too funny.

... and we already know that particles can blink into existence from nowhere ...

Give me a moment to catch my breath. Not only can energy, in the form of matter, blink into existence from nothing, in violation of the 1st Law of Thermo, but it's also "what we know"!

I take it that this is all part of your "random dust clouds are well ordered" argument. Too funny.

, as long as they self-annihilate before laws of conservation are violated.

They wouldn't be able to "self-annihilate" until coming into existence and violating conservation. You've thought this through all the way from start to beginning.

You can insinuate that we already know everything there is to know about the universe, but I don't agree with that.

It would appear that you are the one claiming to be omniscient in everything about the universe and in your ability to predict everything about it.

 

[Cypress]

He's not the one referring to humans as "meat robots".


Too funny! So this is "what we know"? Who confirmed this unconfirmable thing? Way too funny.


Give me a moment to catch my breath. Not only can energy, in the form of matter, blink into existence from nothing, in violation of the 1st Law of Thermo, but it's also "what we know"!

I take it that this is all part of your "random dust clouds are well ordered" argument. Too funny.


They wouldn't be able to "self-annihilate" until coming into existence and violating conservation. You've thought this through all the way from start to beginning.


It would appear that you are the one claiming to be omniscient in everything about the universe and in your ability to predict everything about it.

Matter and energy are interchangeable, changing energy into matter does not violate the concept of conservation.

Virtual particles pop into existence from nothing, but they don't violate principles of conservation because their time of existence is strictly governed by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.

Now, let the frantic Googling by IBDumbass begin!

 

[IBDaMann]

Matter and energy are interchangeable,

Too funny! We've been over this. You are simply regurgitating another embarrassing rookie error that you don't understand.

Nope, matter and non-matter energy are not interchangeable. I feel sorry for you.

changing energy into matter does not violate the concept of conservation.

1. That never happens
2. This isn't what you wrote previously, i.e. you are desperately trying to pivot into something correct.

Virtual particles pop into existence from nothing,

There is no such thing as a "virtual particle." As such, none have ever popped into existence.

 

[Noking]

Too funny! We've been over this. You are simply regurgitating another embarrassing rookie error that you don't understand.

Nope, matter and non-matter energy are not interchangeable. I feel sorry for you.


1. That never happens
2. This isn't what you wrote previously, i.e. you are desperately trying to pivot into something correct.


There is no such thing as a "virtual particle." As such, none have ever popped into existence.

We are getting a lecture on physics from the brilliant Professor from the Funny Farm.

 

[Cypress]

He's not the one referring to humans as "meat robots".

He has openly stated that we do not have free will, our actions are predetermined, and the concept of an autonomous individual we think of as 'me' is just an illusion.

That's a meat robot

 

[Cypress]

Too funny!
There is no such thing as a "virtual particle."

Any reputable physicist will tell you there are, and that it's been experimentally demonstrated.

 

[Cypress]

Nope, matter and non-matter energy are not interchangeable. I feel sorry for you

Matter is a highly concentrated form of energy, and they are interchangeable as shown by E = MC^2

 

[ZenMode]

Now you are resorting to just being disparaging.

Tell me how I'm wrong?

You can insinuate that we already know everything there is to know about the universe, but I don't agree with that.

I have already said, multiple times, that it's much more honest to say "I don't know" than manufacturer fairytale creatures.

 

[Jerry Mathers]

So agnosticism is the most logical position, not atheism, which is fundamentallly a belief system.

no.

religion is not about science.

 

[IBDaMann]

He has openly stated that we do not have free will, our actions are predetermined, and the concept of an autonomous individual we think of as 'me' is just an illusion.

Don't you think you should provide this quote that forms the basis of your claim?

That's a meat robot

Is that your definition?

 

[IBDaMann]

Any reputable physicist will tell you there are, and that it's been experimentally demonstrated.

You sure enjoy your "No True Scotsman" fallacies. No one has ever demonstrated such.

 

[IBDaMann]

Matter is a highly concentrated form of energy, and they are interchangeable as shown by E = MC^2

You'll notice that the word "interchangeable" does not appear anywhere in that equation.

One has to be extremely stupid to believe that light and matter are interchangeable.

 

[Jerry Mathers]

Tell me how I'm wrong?

I have already said, multiple times, that it's much more honest to say "I don't know" than manufacturer fairytale creatures.

totalitarians cannot admit the unknown.

their paranoid quest for power is too fragile to admit they don't know something.

 

[Into the Night]

So the inverse square relationship of electricity

No such relationship or equation.

never existed until 300 years ago when Europeans discovered it? That shouldn't make any sense to you.

No such relationship or equation.

The relationships of universal natural laws are proportional, inverse, geometric, exponential, derivative, logarithmic - independent of whether we base 10 or base 3 numerical systems. These universal laws are discoverable by alien Civilizations who can express these universal relationships in their own mathematical systems.

There is not such thing as 'universal natural laws'.
Random words discarded.
There is no such thing as a 'universal law'.
You don't get to speak for aliens. Omniscience fallacy.
There is no such thing as a 'universal relationship'.

The Universe is not buzzwords.
The Universe is not a law.
The Universe is not an alien.
The Universe is not sentient.
The Universe is not mathematics.
The Universe is not a relationship.

The Universe is unorganized.

I don't believe a wizard, witch, magician, or sorcerer created the universe.

The Universe has no known origin.

The Universe is unorganized.

 

[Into the Night]

There are forces in the universe. The way man tries to explain or define them says nothing about their origin


Yes you do. You are clearly implying that there was some kind of conscious decision to weave these forces and rules and laws into the fabric of the universe.

You are tonight yet because you are trying to pull a bait and switch.

The Universe is not a force.
The Universe is not a fabric.
The Universe is not sentient.

The Universe is unorganized.

 

[ZenMode]

The Universe is not a force.

Saying something is apart of something else isn't saying something IS the thing. Stop being dumb.

Derp.

All other nonsense is ignored.

 

[Jerry Mathers]

You'll notice that the word "interchangeable" does not appear anywhere in that equation.

One has to be extremely stupid to believe that light and matter are interchangeable.

yeah. my friend said turn on the light and so a i threw a brick at him, and told him light and matter were interchangeable.

 

[Jerry Mathers]

Saying something is apart of something else isn't saying something IS the thing. Stop being dumb.

Derp.

All other nonsense is ignored.

yes. compositional error.

is a.. has a....

object oriented ....

 

[Into the Night]

The fundamental forces and universal constants existed since 13.8 billion years ago. Humans didn't create them. Humans discovered them.

There is no such thing as a 'universal constant'.
The Universe is not mathematics.
The Universe is not a constant.
The Universe is not a force.
The Universe has no known age.
The Universe has no known origin.

The Universe is unorganized.

Nature had the concepts of quantity, proportion, momentum, and number embedded within it 13 billion years before humans appeared.

The Universe is not sentient.
The Universe is not a quantity.
The Universe is not a proportion.
The Universe is not a momentum.
The Universe is not a number.
The Universe is not a bed.
The Universe has no known age.
The Universe has no known origin.
The Universe is not mathematics.

The Universe is unorganized.

You are rapidly losing credibility in claiming humans just subjectively invented mathematical relationships and natural laws.

You don't get to declare 'credibility' for anyone. Omniscience fallacy.
Mathematics was created by Man.
Every theory of science was create by Man.
The Universe is not sentient.
The Universe is not credibility.
The Universe is not subjective.
The Universe is an object.
The Universe is not mathematics.
The Universe is not a relationship.
The Universe is not a law.

The Universe is unorganized.

That is not a wizard or a witch. I'm sure it sounds good to your ear to claim that's what I believe. Yes, I think the evidence points to some higher transcendent reality beyond matter and energy.

Strawman fallacy.
Mantra 30a. Don't speak for another.
The Universe is not sentient.
The Universe is not a mode.

The Universe is unorganized.

As an atheist, you believe there is nothing by quarks and electrons bumping into each other in your brain; i.e., there is no free will, there is no autonomous "you", there is no genuine love freely-given, there is no objectively real right and wrong. We are essentially meat robots. That is a steep price to pay to be an atheist.

He is not an atheist. Go learn what 'atheist' means.
The Universe is not a quark.
The Universe is not an electron.
The Universe is not a bumper cars ride.
The Universe is not sentient.
The Universe is not a word game.
The Universe is not love.
The Universe is not right.
The Universe is not wrong.
The Universe is not meat.
The Universe is not a robot.
Atheism has no price.

The Universe is unorganized.

 

[Cypress]

You'll notice that the word "interchangeable" does not appear anywhere in that equation!

"Matter is a concentrated form of energy, and the two are interchangeable."

~European Center for Nuclear Research (CERN)​

​

Accelerators – Home | CERN

home.cern

One has to be extremely stupid to believe that light and matter are interchangeable!

In high energy conditions, photons can convert to an electron and a positron.
.