Archaeology of the New Testament

[IBDaMann]

Physics noobs playing word games carries no weight.

Correct.

We have known for nine decades that E=MC^2 means matter can can be converted to energy.

1. Who is this "we" who is so egregiously mistaken and misinformed? Are you using the Marxist "we" to once again speak about yourself?
2. Are you saying that all this time, you thought you were reading mc² ⇒ E ? You should have gotten a second opinion.

I think it's pretty clear that you are one of the stupidest people on the internet.

That's the basis of nuclear fission in atomic bombs and nuclear fusion in stars.

So you confused ²³⁵U + ¹n → ¹⁴¹Ba + ⁹²Kr + 3·¹n + E and ²H + ³H → ⁴He + ¹n + E for the mc² ⇒ E that you mistakenly thought was E =mc² ?

The equation also implies the reverse reaction; that energy can be converted to matter,

Nope. The equivalence of values does not imply interchangeability of energy and matter. Who took advantage of your gullibility and got you to believe that without question such that you would humiliate yourself posting such on the internet?

and this has been experimentally confirmed ...

I suppose that it was an easy matter to get you to believe this?

because high energy photons can be converted to electrons and positrons.

I hate to splash you with cold water, but only the world's stupidest people fall for this. Once they see that you are a leftist who will fall for Global Warming, they know that you will fall for anything.

 

[Into the Night]

So wrapping up:

Obscure message board poster and notorious physics noob IBDumbass claims matter and energy aren't interchangeable, and that light cannot convert to matter.​

He is not a noob, He is correct.
Matter and energy are not interchangeable.
Light cannot be converted into matter.

​

But the premier European physics research lab CERN states that matter and energy are interchangeable,​

Science is not a government agency.
Your statement ignores theories of science.

and the U.S. national physics lab at Brookhaven showed experimentally that high energy quanta of light can be converted into matter and anti-matter.​

Science is not a government agency.
Light cannot be converted into matter.

Courtier's fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

We don't and there isn't a way we could.

Denial of self fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

There isn't. The way our brains would have to work, to make free will possible, isn't how they work.

Denial of self fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Oh, so this is one of your elaborate and disingenuous word games, where the equal sign in E = MC^2 does not mean energy can convert or change into matter.

I guess you don't know what an equals' sign is after all.
You also don't know the theory of special relativity, and deny it.
Matter cannot be converted to energy. Energy cannot be converted to matter.
Nothing in E=mc^2 says it does.

The U.S. National physics lab at Brookhaven demonstrated experimentally that high energy light quanta can convert to matter and anti-matter.
.

Never happened. It is not possible.
Science is not a government agency.

 

[Cypress]

You might very well be the stupidest poster on the internet!

It obviously makes you angry and embarrassed that what I wrote about matter and energy is supported and corroborated by the premier European nuclear physics lab CERN, and the U.S. national physics lab at Brookhaven.

 

[ZenMode]

Denial of self fallacy.

Yes, nowhere in your brain is the self. There's no part of you that thinks thoughts or feels feelings or intends intentions, etc. Your thoughts appear in consciousness. You don't know what you're going to think next and you can't stop the next thought from coming because there is no self that sits outside of the stream of consciousness that is creating thoughts.

 

[Cypress]

Matter cannot be converted to energy. Energy cannot be converted to matter!
Nothing in E=mc^2 says it does!

Never happened. It is not possible!

E=mc^2 was the foundational principle that led scientists to believe nuclear fission was possible, and that enormous amounts of energy could be released from matter.

Matter is just a highly concentrated form of energy, as implied by E=mc^2.

 

[ZenMode]

Never happened. It is not possible.

Not possible according to who?

 

[Cypress]

So you confused ²³⁵U + ¹n → ¹⁴¹Ba + ⁹²Kr + 3·¹n + E and ²H + ³H → ⁴He + ¹n + E for the mc² ⇒ E that you mistakenly thought was E =mc² ?

Frantically Googling again?
Mass is lost in radioactive decay, Mr. Copy and Paste.

The daughter products of a radioactive decay chain have less combined mass than the mass of the original atomic nuclei.

Where did the mass go? It was converted to energy, specifically gamma radiation and kinetic energy

 

[Jerry Mathers]

Yes, nowhere in your brain is the self. There's no part of you that thinks thoughts or feels feelings or intends intentions, etc. Your thoughts appear in consciousness. You don't know what you're going to think next and you can't stop the next thought from coming because there is no self that sits outside of the stream of consciousness that is creating thoughts.

I disagree. so does thousands of years of all humans religions. not that that;s proof. we can call it anecdotal or cherry-picking, but it;s something.

 

[Jerry Mathers]

and we're back at the crux again, the nazis and their nihilism.

the crux, get it?

 

[ZenMode]

I disagree. so does thousands of years of all humans religions. not that that;s proof. we can call it anecdotal or cherry-picking, but it;s something.

You can disagree, but that doesn't change the fact that you don't know what your next thought is going to be until you think it and you can prevent that next thought from arising.

There's no self that is creating thoughts. There's no self that is sitting outside of your stream of consciousness.

There's only the stream of consciousness.

 

[Jerry Mathers]

You can disagree, but that doesn't change the fact that you don't know what your next thought is going to be until you think it and you can prevent that next thought from arising.

There's no self that is creating thoughts. There's no self that is sitting outside of your stream of consciousness.

There's only the stream of consciousness.

I often plan my thoughts.

you have no control of your thoughts.

your thoughts can be controlled. even by you,

 

[Cypress]

It's funny how MAGA morons complain about worthless humanities and liberal arts degrees are - but then none of these trolls seem have a STEM degree, let alone show any evidence of even having taken high-school physics.

 

[ZenMode]

I often plan my thoughts.

you have no control of your thoughts.

your thoughts can be controlled. even by you,

What do you mean "plan your thoughts"?

 

[Into the Night]

It obviously makes you angry and embarrassed that what I wrote about matter and energy is supported and corroborated by the premier European nuclear physics lab CERN, and the U.S. national physics lab at Brookhaven.

Science is not a government agency.
Matter is not energy. Energy is not matter.
Courtier's fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Yes, nowhere in your brain is the self. There's no part of you that thinks thoughts or feels feelings or intends intentions, etc. Your thoughts appear in consciousness. You don't know what you're going to think next and you can't stop the next thought from coming because there is no self that sits outside of the stream of consciousness that is creating thoughts.

Denial of self fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

E=mc^2 was the foundational principle that led scientists to believe nuclear fission was possible,

No, it isn't. Nuclear fission was known before that.

and that enormous amounts of energy could be released from matter.

Matter is not energy.

Matter is just a highly concentrated form of energy, as implied by E=mc^2.

Matter is not energy. Nothing in E=mc^2 says it is.

 

[Into the Night]

Not possible according to who?

Attempted proof by negation.
Courtier's fallacy.