I don't believe in witches
You provided no support.I gave you links to Europe's premier nuclear physics research Institute and to the United States National physics lab at Brookhaven corroborating that matter and energy are interchangeable, and that light quanta can be converted to matter and anti-matter.
I didn't use Google, Cyborg. These instances show that fission was known before 1900.I'm not interested in how frantically you can Google for tidbits of information.
You don't understand it even today. I have already shown it was known as early as the late 1800's.This is irrelevant and extraneous information to my post you are responding to. Nuclear fission was not understood until the 20th century.
Not the Special Theory of Relativity, Cyborg.E=mc^2 was a direct consequence of Einstein's special theory of relativity.
You believe in the male equivalent that answers your $64,000 question. If you don't believe in a deity, then what was it that injected the universe with all the laws and reason you claim exist?
I don't believe in witches
A single universe would be odd. When the theory was Oscillating Universe, it was easier to take.You believe in the male equivalent that answers your $64,000 question. If you don't believe in a deity, then what was it that injected the universe with all the laws and reason you claim exist?
Are we to believe that all matter existed, but not influenced by any laws of physics, until your being wiggled its nose?
Cite any myth or fairytale story where a witch created the universe and the laws of physics.You believe in the male equivalent that answers your $64,000 question. If you don't believe in a deity, then what was it that injected the universe with all the laws and reason you claim exist?
Are we to believe that all matter existed, but not influenced by any laws of physics, until your being wiggled its nose?
When it comes to physics, CERN and the US national physics lab at Brookhaven are gold standard sources of reliable information about particle physics.You provided no support!
Of course you did.I didn't use Google, Cyborg.
These instances show that fission was known before 1900!!
No worse than your Sky Daddy or your Farting Rainbow Unicorn.You believe in the male equivalent that answers your $64,000 question. If you don't believe in a deity, then what was it that injected the universe with all the laws and reason you claim exist?
Are we to believe that all matter existed, but not influenced by any laws of physics, until your being wiggled its nose?
The Universe is not an oscillation, Sybil.A single universe would be odd. When the theory was Oscillating Universe, it was easier to take.
Go find out what 'uni-' means.Multi-verses would explain the anomaly: infinite universes randomly formed. Some would be dead universes due to have laws that don't allow life. Others would have rules that do allow life. We happen to be in one that allows life albeit rarely.
There are none.Cite any myth or fairytale story where a witch created the universe and the laws of physics.
CERN is not physics.When it comes to physics, CERN and the US national physics lab at Brookhaven are gold standard sources of reliable information about particle physics.
Nope. These terms were CREATED by Man. They are not observations.Of course you did.
Knowing about electrons and radioactivity are observations.
There is no Theory of Nuclear Fission.They are not a theory of nuclear fission anymore than watching apples fall is an theory for gravity.
Nuclear fission is not a process.Nuclear fission wasn't fully understood as a physical process until the 1930s.
It's like you try to sound as dumb as possible.No worse than your Sky Daddy or your Farting Rainbow Unicorn.
Again, it's the celestial equivalent of a witch, not a literal witch.Cite any myth or fairytale story where a witch created the universe and the laws of physics.
Okay, so you have no examples from anywhere in human myth, story, or legend about witches being the cause of the universe and the laws of physics.Again, it's the celestial equivalent of a witch, not a literal witch.
Thanks for this contribution. But a speculative multiverse still is not an explanation for the origin of it all. The BGV theorem proved mathematically 20 years ago that there has to be a finite spacetime boundary somewhere in the past. In other words, an origin. Multiverse also does not explain the origin of the laws of physics and the fundamental forces.A single universe would be odd. When the theory was Oscillating Universe, it was easier to take.
Multi-verses would explain the anomaly: infinite universes randomly formed. Some would be dead universes due to have laws that don't allow life. Others would have rules that do allow life. We happen to be in one that allows life albeit rarely.
The multiverse is a theoretical concept that the universe as perceived by humans is just one of many universes—perhaps an infinite number—that exist in reality. Also known as parallel universes, the meta-universe, or the Many Worlds theory, the idea has long been a staple of science fiction. Scientists, however, believe multiple universes may be a very real possibility and have cited evidence for their existence. Theories on the multiverse range from matching universes arranged like a patchwork quilt to bubble-shaped universes bumping into one another. One exotic idea holds that each choice made by humans in this universe creates an alternate branch of existence where a different choice becomes the reality. In that scenario, alternate earths may exist where the dinosaurs did not become extinct or Christopher Columbus did not sail to the New World.![]()
Multiverse (meta-universe) | Physics | Research Starters | EBSCO Research
<p>The multiverse, often referred to as the meta-universe or parallel universes, is a theoretical concept proposing that our observable universe is just one of potentially infinite universes that coexist in reality. This idea has been a prominent theme in science fiction, but scientists suggest...www.ebsco.com
1. They might be, but you are not. You still do not speak for them.When it comes to physics, CERN and the US national physics lab at Brookhaven are gold standard sources of reliable information about particle physics.
Agreed it doesn't explain how it all started, but undercuts where ZM keeps going with his complaints. LOLThanks for this contribution. But a speculative multiverse still is not an explanation for the origin of it all. The BGV theorem proved mathematically 20 years ago that there has to be a finite spacetime boundary somewhere in the past.
In other words, an origin. Multiverse also does not explain the origin of the laws of physics and the fundamental forces.
Does matter have intrinsic properties? You haven't shown that those were ever created. Did you want to explain how your deity was created?legend about witches being the cause of the universe and the laws of physics.
FTFY. Who created your deity?So when we talk about the cause of the universe and the origin of the laws of physics, it really is quite silly to be bringing Chrisitan deities or witches, warlocks, and sorcerers into the discussion.