Archaeology of the New Testament

giphy.gif
☝️
I don't believe in witches​
 
I gave you links to Europe's premier nuclear physics research Institute and to the United States National physics lab at Brookhaven corroborating that matter and energy are interchangeable, and that light quanta can be converted to matter and anti-matter.
You provided no support.
1. The opinions of others who are equally mistaken are not any more authoritative than your own errors.
2. Those organizations do not misunderstand science as you claim they do.
 
I'm not interested in how frantically you can Google for tidbits of information.
I didn't use Google, Cyborg. These instances show that fission was known before 1900.
This is irrelevant and extraneous information to my post you are responding to. Nuclear fission was not understood until the 20th century.
You don't understand it even today. I have already shown it was known as early as the late 1800's.
E=mc^2 was a direct consequence of Einstein's special theory of relativity.
Not the Special Theory of Relativity, Cyborg.
I already described that theory to you, AND the equation that goes with it. Go back and read it.

Matter is not energy.
Energy is not matter.
You cannot convert matter to energy.
You cannot convert energy to matter.
You cannot destroy matter into nothing.
You cannot create matter out of nothing.
You cannot destroy energy into nothing.
You cannot create energy out of nothing.
 
☝️
I don't believe in witches​
You believe in the male equivalent that answers your $64,000 question. If you don't believe in a deity, then what was it that injected the universe with all the laws and reason you claim exist?

Are we to believe that all matter existed, but not influenced by any laws of physics, until your being wiggled its nose?
 
You believe in the male equivalent that answers your $64,000 question. If you don't believe in a deity, then what was it that injected the universe with all the laws and reason you claim exist?

Are we to believe that all matter existed, but not influenced by any laws of physics, until your being wiggled its nose?
A single universe would be odd. When the theory was Oscillating Universe, it was easier to take.

Multi-verses would explain the anomaly: infinite universes randomly formed. Some would be dead universes due to have laws that don't allow life. Others would have rules that do allow life. We happen to be in one that allows life albeit rarely.

The multiverse is a theoretical concept that the universe as perceived by humans is just one of many universes—perhaps an infinite number—that exist in reality. Also known as parallel universes, the meta-universe, or the Many Worlds theory, the idea has long been a staple of science fiction. Scientists, however, believe multiple universes may be a very real possibility and have cited evidence for their existence. Theories on the multiverse range from matching universes arranged like a patchwork quilt to bubble-shaped universes bumping into one another. One exotic idea holds that each choice made by humans in this universe creates an alternate branch of existence where a different choice becomes the reality. In that scenario, alternate earths may exist where the dinosaurs did not become extinct or Christopher Columbus did not sail to the New World.
 
You believe in the male equivalent that answers your $64,000 question. If you don't believe in a deity, then what was it that injected the universe with all the laws and reason you claim exist?

Are we to believe that all matter existed, but not influenced by any laws of physics, until your being wiggled its nose?
Cite any myth or fairytale story where a witch created the universe and the laws of physics.
 
You believe in the male equivalent that answers your $64,000 question. If you don't believe in a deity, then what was it that injected the universe with all the laws and reason you claim exist?

Are we to believe that all matter existed, but not influenced by any laws of physics, until your being wiggled its nose?
No worse than your Sky Daddy or your Farting Rainbow Unicorn.
 
A single universe would be odd. When the theory was Oscillating Universe, it was easier to take.
The Universe is not an oscillation, Sybil.
Multi-verses would explain the anomaly: infinite universes randomly formed. Some would be dead universes due to have laws that don't allow life. Others would have rules that do allow life. We happen to be in one that allows life albeit rarely.
Go find out what 'uni-' means.
 
When it comes to physics, CERN and the US national physics lab at Brookhaven are gold standard sources of reliable information about particle physics.
CERN is not physics.
The US national physics lab at Brookhaven is not physics.

Science is not a government agency.
Courtier's fallacy.
False authority fallacy.
 
Of course you did.


Knowing about electrons and radioactivity are observations.
Nope. These terms were CREATED by Man. They are not observations.
They are not a theory of nuclear fission anymore than watching apples fall is an theory for gravity.
There is no Theory of Nuclear Fission.
There is no Theory of Gravity.
Nuclear fission wasn't fully understood as a physical process until the 1930s.
Nuclear fission is not a process.
You still don't understand nuclear fission, what it is, or how it occurs.
You are still denying theories of science.
 
Again, it's the celestial equivalent of a witch, not a literal witch.
Okay, so you have no examples from anywhere in human myth, story, or legend about witches being the cause of the universe and the laws of physics.

So when we talk about the cause of the universe and the origin of the laws of physics, it really is quite silly to be bringing witches, warlocks, and sorcerers into the discussion.
 
A single universe would be odd. When the theory was Oscillating Universe, it was easier to take.

Multi-verses would explain the anomaly: infinite universes randomly formed. Some would be dead universes due to have laws that don't allow life. Others would have rules that do allow life. We happen to be in one that allows life albeit rarely.

The multiverse is a theoretical concept that the universe as perceived by humans is just one of many universes—perhaps an infinite number—that exist in reality. Also known as parallel universes, the meta-universe, or the Many Worlds theory, the idea has long been a staple of science fiction. Scientists, however, believe multiple universes may be a very real possibility and have cited evidence for their existence. Theories on the multiverse range from matching universes arranged like a patchwork quilt to bubble-shaped universes bumping into one another. One exotic idea holds that each choice made by humans in this universe creates an alternate branch of existence where a different choice becomes the reality. In that scenario, alternate earths may exist where the dinosaurs did not become extinct or Christopher Columbus did not sail to the New World.
Thanks for this contribution. But a speculative multiverse still is not an explanation for the origin of it all. The BGV theorem proved mathematically 20 years ago that there has to be a finite spacetime boundary somewhere in the past. In other words, an origin. Multiverse also does not explain the origin of the laws of physics and the fundamental forces.
 
When it comes to physics, CERN and the US national physics lab at Brookhaven are gold standard sources of reliable information about particle physics.
1. They might be, but you are not. You still do not speak for them.
2. Lay administrators at such places are notorious for spouting common misconceptions, just as you are. An idiot managing a website isn't an engineer designing CERN.


The fact that you refuse to ever apply any critical reasoning, or to accept critical reasoning from others who are trying to help you, is what keeps you in the running for "stupidest person on the internet."
 
Thanks for this contribution. But a speculative multiverse still is not an explanation for the origin of it all. The BGV theorem proved mathematically 20 years ago that there has to be a finite spacetime boundary somewhere in the past.

In other words, an origin. Multiverse also does not explain the origin of the laws of physics and the fundamental forces.
Agreed it doesn't explain how it all started, but undercuts where ZM keeps going with his complaints. LOL

Nothing explains it. :)
 
legend about witches being the cause of the universe and the laws of physics.
Does matter have intrinsic properties? You haven't shown that those were ever created. Did you want to explain how your deity was created?

So when we talk about the cause of the universe and the origin of the laws of physics, it really is quite silly to be bringing Chrisitan deities or witches, warlocks, and sorcerers into the discussion.
FTFY. Who created your deity?
 
Back
Top