Buzzword fallacies (logic, inference, mathematical, rational, lawful, timeless, immaterial, organize, agency, principle, witch).
You can't blame your problem on anybody else, Sybil.
Whining.
Atheism is not a race.
Since ^^^^ this ^°^^post....
The funny part is that you keep tap dancing around my belief that this is all related to your Christian sky wizard, yet you keep bringing up atheism.
The Sky Wizard is YOUR god, Void. It has nothing to do with Christ or Christianity.
What is the bait?
He just called his god a nothing. You're complaining?
Neither of you are discussing Christianity at all.
So, In multiple discussions where I have expressed the fact that I don't believe in any gods and am, by definition, an atheist, you believe that my referencing a sky wizard is suddenly a reference to a God that I believe in and not used to mock the Christian God?
That's all fine since no one can prove why or how the Universe came to be. I'm disagree with people who believe the Bible is 100% true and I disagree with people like you who mock it and claim it's 100% fabrication.
You are not an atheist.
DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!
Assumption of victory fallacy.
You are not an atheist.
How do you know it 'came to be'?
Then you disagree with everyone.
Fair enough.
Ok, so you’re dumb. Got it.
I'm dumb because I pointed out your gods and your own posts to you??
You're dumb because you are too dense to recognize mocking/sarcasm when you see it.
You didn't post any science to support your assertion. You posted words that a lay administrator told a web developer to write, possibly obtained from a hallucinating AI application. You have yet to discuss any science. This is because you wouldn't be able to enter a conversation about relevant science. All you are capable of doing is finding web sites that contain the same mistaken beliefs as yours.
Nope, not when you are either misquoting or accurately quoting someone who is mistaken. What you need to do is to support your assertions, not point to error on the internet that you believe "must be true" because you read them on the internet. Not only are you stupid, but you are gullible as well, and expect everyone elese to be as gullible as you, which corroborates you being one of the stupidest people on the internet.
You completely EVADED my question, probably because you cannot read. I asked you if matter has intrinsic properties. That would be answered with a 'yes' or a 'no'.
That does not necessarily follow. Has @Into the Night agreed to this?
You just explained why the universe could not have been created.
You haven't shown that any such thing with said impossible properties exists.
Nope. Non-existant. You just described the non-existant.
What 'mocking sarcasm'? You are the only one mentioning a Sky Wizard as a god. You are the only one mentioning a Farting Rainbow Unicorn as a god.
Whooooaaah, easy there Tiger, you worship the Climate goddess, precluding atheism.
Let's see ... you think that it is foolish to believe that a great flood occurred in which the waters prevailed 15 cubits, and that extreme weather killed all life on the planet, because that's impossible ... but that we are foolish to not believe that in 30 years, or by the end of the century, that the world's waters will prevail 15 cubits, and that extreme weather will kill all life on the planet, because that is an absolute certainty once we reach the "tipping point", and it might already be too late.
On a side note, no matter how you respond, you lose. If you admit to your profound devotion to your Climate faith, you lose your title of "atheist"; if you disavow your religious Climate beliefs, you acknowledge the religious nature of the Climate faith, which you fight tooth-and-nail to keep concealed (even though everyone already knows).
Organized Religion chases away as many as it brings in!
Again, thanks for confirming.