Fires rage near Moscow after Ukrainian drone strikes

Terry does not believe technology ever improves or changes anything. He is 100% consistent in that position.

In another thread he claims the drones now, in terms of impact on battle field are really no different than the ones he references from 1994 despite todays AI driven smart drones being considered by all first militaries as a real game changer on the world stage and something they all are quickly trying to add to their arsenals while adapting to the different threat they pose.
More proof that MAGAts are traitors. They support Russia attacking the West.

axd0rj.jpg
 
Then he probably really supports Trump's idea of rebooting the archaic era of massive battleships and dreadnoughts.
No, I don't. The battleship, even one like the Kirov

Kirov%2BClass%2B3.jpg


Is simply too much ship for too little return value. They are expensive targets.

A big gun battleship, sort of like what Trump wants is a complete waste of money and effort.
 
Then he probably really supports Trump's idea of rebooting the archaic era of massive battleships and dreadnoughts.
Yup.

That is exactly who @T. A. Gardner is.

Look at his post reply to me above where he does not give a single thought to the curve of IMPROVEMENT that drones are on and will tell you there are no better than ones from a 100 years ago based on where he sees them today and in the past.

His mind is unable to assess PROGRESS of technology.

There simply is no denying that AI drones are one of, if not the singles biggest battlefield development of the modern age, in terms of reshaping the battlefield and how armies, especially those of smaller and weaker countries, can engage and fight with bigger powers. Perhaps we see bigger powers adapt and negate that with their own focus on drones but that still means drones are core.

And yet Terry will deny all of that and will speak to the past and what he sees now while be incapable of seeing the trajectory.

And guys like Terry are not unique. We all have worked with them over the years and they are the guys who fight any change and denied any technology improvement in the work place when it was in its early stages the improvements were smaller as they simply could not project out and see the progression curve.

Mostly you ignore them in the work place but if they get in to a position of decision making they can really hurt a company.
 
I thought about that too every time some Trump dick sucker hollers in frustration that we should just bomb Iran back to the Stone Age. Ukraine is the model that you can't just bomb a committed enemy into submission.
Not when losing for them means the loss of their regime, the loss of their country and death.

In both Ukraine and Iran, if they lose those wars they are completely done.

You put peoples back up against the wall like that and of course they will fight to the last person,
 
No, I don't. The battleship, even one like the Kirov

Kirov%2BClass%2B3.jpg


Is simply too much ship for too little return value. They are expensive targets.

A big gun battleship, sort of like what Trump wants is a complete waste of money and effort.
So Trump is an idiot for trying to bring back the age of the battleship.
That kind of idiocy is extremely rare in a president of the United States.
 
Yup.

That is exactly who @T. A. Gardner is.

Look at his post reply to me above where he does not give a single thought to the curve of IMPROVEMENT that drones are on and will tell you there are no better than ones from a 100 years ago based on where he sees them today and in the past.

His mind is unable to assess PROGRESS of technology.

There simply is no denying that AI drones are one of, if not the singles biggest battlefield development of the modern age, in terms of reshaping the battlefield and how armies, especially those of smaller and weaker countries, can engage and fight with bigger powers. Perhaps we see bigger powers adapt and negate that with their own focus on drones but that still means drones are core.

And yet Terry will deny all of that and will speak to the past and what he sees now while be incapable of seeing the trajectory.

And guys like Terry are not unique. We all have worked with them over the years and they are the guys who fight any change and denied any technology improvement in the work place when it was in its early stages the improvements were smaller as they simply could not project out and see the progression curve.

Mostly you ignore them in the work place but if they get in to a position of decision making they can really hurt a company.
The tactical and strategic lessons of the Ukraine war are going to be taught at military academies and war colleges for the next generation. I don't see how anyone with a passing interest in military history can be oblivious to that.
 
The tactical and strategic lessons of the Ukraine war are going to be taught at military academies and war colleges for the next generation. I don't see how anyone with a passing interest in military history can be oblivious to that.
Agreed. Ergo, it's not about history or military knowledge, but about pushing a political ideology.
 
Agreed. Ergo, it's not about history or military knowledge, but about pushing a political ideology.
Almost five years ago, Stone claimed Putin was in total control of Ukraine and could unilaterally impose his will on them, lol

February 2022 - Putin... is in Ukraine now and controls its fate totally. If he chooses to he can grind it into the dust if he wants to,...He can do whatever he wants.
 
The battleship, even one like the Kirov

Kirov%2BClass%2B3.jpg
That is clearly not a battleship. It does not have the big guns of a battleship, so it is about as much a battleship as it is a aircraft carrier. Not to mention it is half the size of a battleship and lightly armored. The armor and guns of a battleship makes it look four times the weight of that, even though it is only two times the weight.

trump wants something physically impressive, and a battlecruiser will just not be that.
 
Almost five years ago, Stone claimed Putin was in total control of Ukraine and could unilaterally impose his will on them, lol
Well, most people realize that Stone was born with a silver spoon in his mouth and grew up with a mother and older brothers protecting his fat ass. As such, he never developed a brain nor a personality.

Anyone who accepts advice from such a person shouldn't be allowed to drive. LOL
 
  • Haha
Reactions: QP!
The tactical and strategic lessons of the Ukraine war are going to be taught at military academies and war colleges for the next generation. I don't see how anyone with a passing interest in military history can be oblivious to that.
The Ukrainians are already legends in military history

For centuries they have had a record of defeating larger aggressors

It’s why so many American retired military immediately flew there to join them


They have saved their nation from larger foreboding forces all throughout their exsistence
 
That is clearly not a battleship. It does not have the big guns of a battleship, so it is about as much a battleship as it is a aircraft carrier. Not to mention it is half the size of a battleship and lightly armored. The armor and guns of a battleship makes it look four times the weight of that, even though it is only two times the weight.

trump wants something physically impressive, and a battlecruiser will just not be that.
8169949-Groucho-Marx-Quote-He-may-look-like-an-idiot-and-talk-like-an-idiot-but-don-t-let-that.jpg
 
The Ukrainians are already legends in military history

For centuries they have had a record of defeating larger aggressors

It’s why so many American retired military immediately flew there to join them


They have saved their nation from larger foreboding forces all throughout their exsistence
For the last five years, many Trump dick suckers were hollering at Ukraine to just give up and surrender. That gives you some idea of how committed MAGA morons would be to defend America against a powerful adversary.
 
Back
Top