Into the Night
Contributor
Argument of the Stone fallacy. Bulverism fallacy.
The most secure election ever and other lies.
- Thread starter FastLane
- Start date
ZenMode
Well-known member
Again, the ball is in your court, dans la nuit.
Into the Night
Contributor
RQAA
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
One can't fight delusion.
You're trying to turn eyewitness testimony into an opinion. Observations are not opinions. Empirical evidence is not an opinion. Why you believe it is is your clue that you are enslaved by delusion. You already think you see Global Warming everywhere. A critical reasoner you are not.
No State is a person, despite your attempts at anthropomorphism. No State is "looking" for anything. The election workers who observed the election fraud are people who observed election fraud and provided sworn affidavits detailing the election fraud. Yet here you sit, in your little echo chamber, OBEYING orders to deny everything they observed.
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
If I recall correctly, you didn't offer any sort of support for your claim beyond your usual delusional omniscience fallacy that has you dismissing even mountainous eyewitness testimony to the contrary for no reason other than ... your delusion.
So, no, you need to show that your affirmative claim actually happened. That's how it works. Your delusions don't count and are ignored.
The perpetrator of the cheating claims that it was fixed? Great. You still have to show that it happened.
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
I notice that you have resorted to "pulling a Cypress", i.e. exhausting every applicable fallacy until nothing remains but declaring that your opponent has admitted defeat.
You have learned well that this works on leftists.
I haven't heard much about Global Warming lately. When is your church projected to be buried and eulogized?
ZenMode
Well-known member
Acknowledging opinion isn't delusion.
Agree. What IS opinion is what people THINK they see vs what they actually saw.
For example, lots of people thought they saw a guy rolling a wagon of ballots into the TCF Center on election night. What they actually saw was a cameraman rolling his camera equipment.
Agree. Eye witness testimony isn't empirical.
They provided sworn affidavits stating what they think they saw.
ZenMode
Well-known member
Nope, just bringing attention to the fact that dans la nuit isn't answering questions.
ZenMode
Well-known member
I'm dismissing anything. I'm acknowledging what it is - people think they saw something.
Some people think they've seen big foot or ghosts or demons or Jesus in a piece of toast.
I'm just asking why he believes it wasn't fixed in 2024. I can provide a source for my belief. Why can't dans la nuit?
Into the Night
Contributor
Void argument fallacy.
Into the Night
Contributor
Pivot fallacy. Evidence is not opinion.
You cannot make any evidence just disappear, Void.
Irrelevant.
YARP
You just conflicted your own argument again, Void. Which is, dude?
Into the Night
Contributor
Into the Night
Contributor
Lie. Argument of the Stone fallacy. RQAA.
ZenMode
Well-known member
Sworn affidavits are what people think they saw. Thinking you saw a guy pulling a wagon full of ballpts doesn't turn camera equipment into ballots.
ZenMode
Well-known member
dans la nuit, the cheese eating surrender monkey, rides again!
ZenMode
Well-known member
I've asked you dozens of questions that you won't answer, dans la nuit.
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
Declaring observations and empirical evidence, e.g. video, to be mere opinion is declaring objective truth to be subjective opinion, and that is delusional.
What IS delusion is pretending to be omniscient and simply declaring that eyewitnesses are somehow mistaken in what they observed.
... or nobody thought that. How many sworn affidavits have you ignored that indicate something different?
What you are actually deluding is some fictional event that no one is considering and for which there are no sworn affidavits.
You are pretending to be omniscient.
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
Nope. You didn't direct any attention to that. You simply declared that he somehow confessed that you had won, i.e. you pulled a Cypress.
ZenMode
Well-known member
There was video of voter fraud that wasn't prosecuted? Link?
Nothing to do with omniscience. Like I said, people swore they saw a man wheeling a wagon full of ballots into TCF Center. That's what sparked the chaos there. You treat eye witness testimony like it's gold and it's not. People make mistakes. People think they see things that they don't actually see.
Have you seen the Melissa Carone testimony in Michigan? She signed an affidavits swearing to all kinds of things. She was wrong.
Again, people think they see a lot of things. People thought they saw suitcases of Biden ballots in Georgia. What they actually saw was the standards storage bins used to store ballots.