How Fauci Is Seen Through A Less Clouded Lens

Jerry Mathers said:
no.

fauci is dancing around about what "gain of function". its not difficult or confusing.

fauci is as smart as bill Clinton being clever about "what the definition of is is".
Click to expand...
"Gain of function" when it comes to viruses and disease is something that will ALWAYS be studied and SHOULD BE and if gov'ts have to do it as part of a black ops program they WILL. What they WILL NOT do is not study it.

that is not the question or issue but because you are a magat and ergo dumb you will not be able to follow what i say next.

The question gov'ts like the US have to wrestle with is how much they all their scientists to just study it versus trigger or push it.

The reason the US and other will always participate in studying it is the same reason gov'ts are all now saying they back AI pushes to super intelligence despite knowing the huge risks.

that Viruses will continue 'gain function' naturally and in enemy labs around the world is as much as a given as that if the US does not pursue AI super intelligence other adverse countries will.

The US simply WILL NOT cede those threats to others while not trying to have a lead position in the research for both defensive and offensive means. THEY WILL NOT and 'gain of function' will always be done, no matter the name they try to hide it under.
 
Punish Fauci. Pursue Fauci. Punish Fauci. Pursue Fauci. Punish Fauci. Pursue Fauci. Punish Fauci. Pursue Fauci. Punish Fauci. Pursue Fauci. Punish Fauci. Pursue Fauci. Punish Fauci. Pursue Fauci. Punish Fauci. Pursue Fauci. [/marquee]
 
martin said:
How Fauci is seen through a less clouded lens:

"Scientific Peer Respect: Within European scientific circles, such as the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Fauci is widely revered for his decades-long career spanning the HIV/AIDS epidemic to COVID-19. European public health agencies have historically viewed his research and leadership as the "gold standard" of medical rigor.

"The "Fauci" Archetype: Fauci became such a prominent symbol of scientific communication during the pandemic that major European media outlets routinely used him as a benchmark. For example, when Karl Lauterbach was appointed Germany’s Health Minister, the European press widely dubbed him “Germany’s Fauci” to denote a deeply qualified, straight-talking public health defender."

Washington Post.
Click to expand...
The Anti-Fachi group is the modern equivalent of a Flat Earther. Because they do not understand the science, they attack it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
ThatOwlWoman said:
Thanks.
This truth is why the MAGATs hate Fauci and want to drag him down to their bottom-of-the-sewer level:

SuoHSjF.png
Click to expand...
In this case, Trump. Fauci is a lying sack of shit whose medical advice may well kill you. Trump you can ignore.
 
Jarod said:
The Anti-Fachi group is the modern equivalent of a Flat Earther. Because they do not understand the science, they attack it.
Click to expand...
Yea, right...

I ignored all of Fauci's advice and didn't get Chinese Disease even though I was out and about everyday on service calls. On the other hand, Joke Bribem, aka Autopen, took all of Fauci's advice and got it three times.
 
"the 6-foot social distancing rule, which the CDC originally recommended, had not been backed by a clinical trial. This is despite constant claims that COVID-19 protocols were based on science."

The above sentence is from the opinion piece, @Sailor cited, it is a great example of how people are tricked if they are not critical thinkers...

"Backed by clinical Trials" is not the same as "based on science".

You see, science is a much broader category. Something can easily, in fact usually is, backed by science yet not backed by a clinical trial. There is much more that Science can support other than something having been backed by a clinical trial. Very few things, other than drugs ar ebacked by clinical trials. That's because clinical trials are very expensive and unless there is money to be made, nobody is spending the money for a clinical trial. THAT DOES NOT MEAN ITS NOT BACKED BY SCIENCE. Can you understand now?

This is why Randall Paul would not let Fauci explain things, because he could not throw his shade if Fauci were allowed to explain it.

@Sailor
 
T. A. Gardner said:
In this case, Trump. Fauci is a lying sack of shit whose medical advice may well kill you. Trump you can ignore.
Click to expand...
Why would Trump's medical advice, of which he gives often in direct conflict with accepted medical studies not "kill" people?

Are you saying Magats trust and follow Fauci more than they do Trump?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top