Supreme hypocrisy

Crepitus

Well-known member
Contributor
Sent to me as an email, I didn't write it, but I did fact check it.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett went before Congress recently to ask for an additional $14 million in security funding for court employees. She told a personal story about struggling to explain to her 12-year-old son about why mommy had to wear a bulletproof vest to work.

She should have told her son that, when state officials pass sensible gun control laws, she votes to overturn them. She should have told him that, in Wolford v. Lopez, she struck down a law which would have required people to get permission from a property owner before bringing a loaded weapon into a hotel or restaurant. She should have told him that, in Kanter v. Barr, she voted to uphold the rights of some convicted felons to keep their guns.

She should have told him that gun violence is the number one cause of death for children in America, but the courts don’t seem to take that under consideration when they make their rulings.

She should have told him that mommy was going to be just fine because the taxpayers were going to pay lots of money to keep her safe from the gun-violence she enables from her position on the Supreme Court.
 
Would one consider a thread about the 2nd amendment and Supreme Court Judge safety a political thread?
Asking for a friend.
 
Sent to me as an email, I didn't write it, but I did fact check it.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett went before Congress recently to ask for an additional $14 million in security funding for court employees. She told a personal story about struggling to explain to her 12-year-old son about why mommy had to wear a bulletproof vest to work.

She should have told her son that, when state officials pass sensible gun control laws, she votes to overturn them. She should have told him that, in Wolford v. Lopez, she struck down a law which would have required people to get permission from a property owner before bringing a loaded weapon into a hotel or restaurant. She should have told him that, in Kanter v. Barr, she voted to uphold the rights of some convicted felons to keep their guns.

She should have told him that gun violence is the number one cause of death for children in America, but the courts don’t seem to take that under consideration when they make their rulings.


She should have told him that mommy was going to be just fine because the taxpayers were going to pay lots of money to keep her safe from the gun-violence she enables from her position on the Supreme Court.

Do my guns scare you, Creepy?
 
Do my guns scare you, Creepy?
Yea a rube with his popguns


giphy.gif
 
She should have told her son that, when state officials pass sensible gun control laws, she votes to overturn them.
Too funny! Crepitus thinks that the Supreme Court is Congress, and that Justices are legislators! You can't make this shit up.
 
Back
Top