Are you sad about that?
On the claim: “Did someone shoot at Trump? No. So there was no attempt to assassinate.”
Strictly speaking, no one fired a shot at Trump in the Jeanine John Taele incident. Trump was not present when Taele was arrested, and no attack with gunfire occurred. That narrow point is factually correct.
But the rest of the argument is weaker. Authorities did not treat this as ordinary loitering with a gun. According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, FBI, and Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department:
- Taele was observed on the grounds of Trump National Golf Club in Rancho Palos Verdes days before the president’s scheduled visit, photographing and recording security-planning activity while wearing an earpiece.
- He told agents he was State Department security detail.
- He had a loaded magazine with hollow-point rounds in his pocket, a loaded pistol in his vehicle, binoculars, and a badge reading “security protection agent.”
- A search of his home recovered an illegally modified short-barreled AR-platform rifle, additional firearms, body armor, high-capacity magazines, radio devices, and notebooks containing what officials called “concerning statements.”
- He was already out on bail in a prior robbery case.
Federal prosecutors charged him with possession of an unregistered short-barreled rifle (a felony carrying up to 10 years). Officials described the behavior as “troubling,” said it “raised serious red flags,” and noted they were “thankful he was apprehended before the President’s visit.” The investigation into his motives remains open; Secret Service and the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force are involved.
In both legal and ordinary language, an “assassination attempt” or disrupted plot does not require a shot to have been fired. Substantial preparatory steps — scouting security, arming oneself with modified weapons and body armor, claiming official status, and making concerning written statements — can support attempt, conspiracy, or threat-related charges, and are routinely described as foiled assassination efforts when the target is a president.
The claim is true only if one insists that “attempt” means “successful discharge of a firearm at the target.” Under any broader, practical, or investigative standard used by law enforcement here, the conduct was treated as a serious potential threat that was interrupted early.
www.realclearpolling.com
