Democrat voters in Michigan are JUMPING SHIP, saying they will NOT vote for "Abdul" El Sayed — a socialist

I would add to that, that the very education many of the top people in these Islamic terrorist organizations got was from Western universities where they studied for years under radical Leftist professors and academics while surrounded by a heavily radical Leftist student body that radicalized them.

Fact check: "Many of the top people in Islamic terrorist organizations got their education from Western universities where they studied for years under radical Leftist professors and academics while surrounded by a heavily radical Leftist student body that radicalized them."




Partially true on education, but largely false or unsupported on the claimed mechanism of radicalization by radical Leftist professors and student bodies.


Many senior figures and operatives in groups like al-Qaeda and related networks had university educations, frequently in technical or professional fields, and a notable minority studied in the West. This is well-documented and contradicts the older stereotype of terrorists as mostly uneducated madrasa products. However, the specific claim that they were radicalized by radical Leftist professors/academics and a heavily radical Leftist student environment does not hold up as a general pattern.


Education backgrounds (supported)​


  • Osama bin Laden: Studied business administration/economics (and reportedly civil engineering elements) at King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Influenced there by Islamist thinkers linked to the Muslim Brotherhood (including Muhammad Qutb, brother of Sayyid Qutb). Not a Western university.
  • Ayman al-Zawahiri: Medical degree (surgery) from Cairo University; later master's. From a prominent Egyptian family; radicalized early via Islamist ideology (Qutb’s writings) and Egyptian Islamic Jihad circles while studying and practicing medicine in Egypt. Not Western-educated.
  • Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (9/11 operational planner): Mechanical engineering degree from North Carolina A&T State University (U.S.).
  • Mohamed Atta (lead 9/11 hijacker): Architecture from Cairo University; urban planning studies at the Technical University of Hamburg-Harburg (Germany). The Hamburg cell formed while several studied there.
  • Other examples: Ramzi Yousef (1993 WTC) studied engineering in the UK/Wales area; several British plotters (e.g., elements of the 7/7 London bombings, liquid bomb plot, Glasgow airport attempt) attended UK universities; Anwar al-Awlaki studied in the U.S. and was pursuing a PhD at George Washington University at one point; “Jihadi John” (Mohammed Emwazi) studied computer programming at the University of Westminster.

Studies (e.g., Gambetta & Hertog’s work on “Engineers of Jihad,” Bergen analyses of major plots) consistently find that among known Islamist militants with higher education, engineering and other technical degrees are heavily overrepresented relative to population baselines. University attendance rates among militants from Muslim-majority countries are often higher than national averages. Western-educated cases exist and are overrepresented in some high-profile plots, but they are not the majority of “top people” across organizations.


The radicalization mechanism (not supported as claimed)​


The claim that these individuals were radicalized while studying for years under radical Leftist professors and surrounded by a heavily radical Leftist student body lacks evidence as a primary or common pathway.


  • Radicalization for the core historical leaders (bin Laden, Zawahiri, early Egyptian Islamic Jihad figures) occurred primarily through Islamist ideologues (Sayyid Qutb and followers, Muslim Brotherhood networks, Afghan jihad experiences against the Soviets), personal/political grievances, and underground cells—before or outside any Western university setting.
  • For those who attended Western universities, documented radicalization more often involved campus Islamic societies, radical Islamist speakers (e.g., al-Muhajiroun figures in the UK), personal networks, foreign conflicts (Bosnia, Afghanistan, etc.), or online/offline Islamist propaganda—not Leftist faculty or mainstream progressive student culture. Examples include Omar Saeed Sheikh at LSE and various UK cases where Islamic societies hosted hardline preachers.
  • There is no systematic evidence that Western leftist academia systematically produced these jihadist leaders. Some Western university environments have had issues with tolerance of Islamist extremism or antisemitism in certain student groups, and alienation/identity issues can play a role for diaspora students, but the ideology adopted is Islamist/Salafi-jihadist, not leftist. The technical skew (engineers, etc.) is better explained by other factors in the literature (cognitive styles, status frustration, recruitment patterns) than by Leftist professors.

In short: Higher education—including some Western technical degrees—is common among certain jihadist elites and plotters, and universities (especially in the West for some operatives) have sometimes served as recruitment or networking environments. The specific causal story blaming “radical Leftist professors and academics” and a radical Left student body as the radicalizing force is not substantiated by the biographical and research record. Radicalization tracks far more closely with Islamist ideological networks and experiences.



 
Fact check: "Many of the top people in Islamic terrorist organizations got their education from Western universities where they studied for years under radical Leftist professors and academics while surrounded by a heavily radical Leftist student body that radicalized them."




Partially true on education, but largely false or unsupported on the claimed mechanism of radicalization by radical Leftist professors and student bodies.


Many senior figures and operatives in groups like al-Qaeda and related networks had university educations, frequently in technical or professional fields, and a notable minority studied in the West. This is well-documented and contradicts the older stereotype of terrorists as mostly uneducated madrasa products. However, the specific claim that they were radicalized by radical Leftist professors/academics and a heavily radical Leftist student environment does not hold up as a general pattern.


Education backgrounds (supported)​


  • Osama bin Laden: Studied business administration/economics (and reportedly civil engineering elements) at King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Influenced there by Islamist thinkers linked to the Muslim Brotherhood (including Muhammad Qutb, brother of Sayyid Qutb). Not a Western university.
  • Ayman al-Zawahiri: Medical degree (surgery) from Cairo University; later master's. From a prominent Egyptian family; radicalized early via Islamist ideology (Qutb’s writings) and Egyptian Islamic Jihad circles while studying and practicing medicine in Egypt. Not Western-educated.
  • Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (9/11 operational planner): Mechanical engineering degree from North Carolina A&T State University (U.S.).
  • Mohamed Atta (lead 9/11 hijacker): Architecture from Cairo University; urban planning studies at the Technical University of Hamburg-Harburg (Germany). The Hamburg cell formed while several studied there.
  • Other examples: Ramzi Yousef (1993 WTC) studied engineering in the UK/Wales area; several British plotters (e.g., elements of the 7/7 London bombings, liquid bomb plot, Glasgow airport attempt) attended UK universities; Anwar al-Awlaki studied in the U.S. and was pursuing a PhD at George Washington University at one point; “Jihadi John” (Mohammed Emwazi) studied computer programming at the University of Westminster.

Studies (e.g., Gambetta & Hertog’s work on “Engineers of Jihad,” Bergen analyses of major plots) consistently find that among known Islamist militants with higher education, engineering and other technical degrees are heavily overrepresented relative to population baselines. University attendance rates among militants from Muslim-majority countries are often higher than national averages. Western-educated cases exist and are overrepresented in some high-profile plots, but they are not the majority of “top people” across organizations.


The radicalization mechanism (not supported as claimed)​


The claim that these individuals were radicalized while studying for years under radical Leftist professors and surrounded by a heavily radical Leftist student body lacks evidence as a primary or common pathway.


  • Radicalization for the core historical leaders (bin Laden, Zawahiri, early Egyptian Islamic Jihad figures) occurred primarily through Islamist ideologues (Sayyid Qutb and followers, Muslim Brotherhood networks, Afghan jihad experiences against the Soviets), personal/political grievances, and underground cells—before or outside any Western university setting.
  • For those who attended Western universities, documented radicalization more often involved campus Islamic societies, radical Islamist speakers (e.g., al-Muhajiroun figures in the UK), personal networks, foreign conflicts (Bosnia, Afghanistan, etc.), or online/offline Islamist propaganda—not Leftist faculty or mainstream progressive student culture. Examples include Omar Saeed Sheikh at LSE and various UK cases where Islamic societies hosted hardline preachers.
  • There is no systematic evidence that Western leftist academia systematically produced these jihadist leaders. Some Western university environments have had issues with tolerance of Islamist extremism or antisemitism in certain student groups, and alienation/identity issues can play a role for diaspora students, but the ideology adopted is Islamist/Salafi-jihadist, not leftist. The technical skew (engineers, etc.) is better explained by other factors in the literature (cognitive styles, status frustration, recruitment patterns) than by Leftist professors.

In short: Higher education—including some Western technical degrees—is common among certain jihadist elites and plotters, and universities (especially in the West for some operatives) have sometimes served as recruitment or networking environments. The specific causal story blaming “radical Leftist professors and academics” and a radical Left student body as the radicalizing force is not substantiated by the biographical and research record. Radicalization tracks far more closely with Islamist ideological networks and experiences.



In other words, I am generally correct and Grok is just making trivial objections (aka hair splitting, etc.).
 
In other words, I am generally correct and Grok is just making trivial objections (aka hair splitting, etc.).

The guy quotes the full fact-check, then immediately reframes it as “I am generally correct and Grok is just making trivial objections (aka hair splitting).”


That’s the tell. When the education part is conceded (plenty of top jihadis were university-educated, some in the West, heavy engineering skew) but the causal claim about radical Leftist professors and student bodies radicalizing them is rejected as unsupported, the response isn’t “fair point on the mechanism” — it’s “you’re splitting hairs.”


The mechanism was the load-bearing part of the original assertion. Without it, you’re left with “some of them went to university,” which is true but far less interesting (and less politically useful) than the claim that Western leftist academia produced them.


He’s treating any distinction between “educated in the West” and “radicalized by the Western left” as pedantry because the second half is the part that fits the preferred narrative. That’s not hair-splitting. That’s the difference between correlation and the specific causation being asserted.

 
Fact check: "Many of the top people in Islamic terrorist organizations got their education from Western universities where they studied for years under radical Leftist professors and academics while surrounded by a heavily radical Leftist student body that radicalized them."




Partially true on education, but largely false or unsupported on the claimed mechanism of radicalization by radical Leftist professors and student bodies.


Many senior figures and operatives in groups like al-Qaeda and related networks had university educations, frequently in technical or professional fields, and a notable minority studied in the West. This is well-documented and contradicts the older stereotype of terrorists as mostly uneducated madrasa products. However, the specific claim that they were radicalized by radical Leftist professors/academics and a heavily radical Leftist student environment does not hold up as a general pattern.


Education backgrounds (supported)​


  • Osama bin Laden: Studied business administration/economics (and reportedly civil engineering elements) at King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Influenced there by Islamist thinkers linked to the Muslim Brotherhood (including Muhammad Qutb, brother of Sayyid Qutb). Not a Western university.
  • Ayman al-Zawahiri: Medical degree (surgery) from Cairo University; later master's. From a prominent Egyptian family; radicalized early via Islamist ideology (Qutb’s writings) and Egyptian Islamic Jihad circles while studying and practicing medicine in Egypt. Not Western-educated.
  • Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (9/11 operational planner): Mechanical engineering degree from North Carolina A&T State University (U.S.).
  • Mohamed Atta (lead 9/11 hijacker): Architecture from Cairo University; urban planning studies at the Technical University of Hamburg-Harburg (Germany). The Hamburg cell formed while several studied there.
  • Other examples: Ramzi Yousef (1993 WTC) studied engineering in the UK/Wales area; several British plotters (e.g., elements of the 7/7 London bombings, liquid bomb plot, Glasgow airport attempt) attended UK universities; Anwar al-Awlaki studied in the U.S. and was pursuing a PhD at George Washington University at one point; “Jihadi John” (Mohammed Emwazi) studied computer programming at the University of Westminster.

Studies (e.g., Gambetta & Hertog’s work on “Engineers of Jihad,” Bergen analyses of major plots) consistently find that among known Islamist militants with higher education, engineering and other technical degrees are heavily overrepresented relative to population baselines. University attendance rates among militants from Muslim-majority countries are often higher than national averages. Western-educated cases exist and are overrepresented in some high-profile plots, but they are not the majority of “top people” across organizations.


The radicalization mechanism (not supported as claimed)​


The claim that these individuals were radicalized while studying for years under radical Leftist professors and surrounded by a heavily radical Leftist student body lacks evidence as a primary or common pathway.


  • Radicalization for the core historical leaders (bin Laden, Zawahiri, early Egyptian Islamic Jihad figures) occurred primarily through Islamist ideologues (Sayyid Qutb and followers, Muslim Brotherhood networks, Afghan jihad experiences against the Soviets), personal/political grievances, and underground cells—before or outside any Western university setting.
  • For those who attended Western universities, documented radicalization more often involved campus Islamic societies, radical Islamist speakers (e.g., al-Muhajiroun figures in the UK), personal networks, foreign conflicts (Bosnia, Afghanistan, etc.), or online/offline Islamist propaganda—not Leftist faculty or mainstream progressive student culture. Examples include Omar Saeed Sheikh at LSE and various UK cases where Islamic societies hosted hardline preachers.
  • There is no systematic evidence that Western leftist academia systematically produced these jihadist leaders. Some Western university environments have had issues with tolerance of Islamist extremism or antisemitism in certain student groups, and alienation/identity issues can play a role for diaspora students, but the ideology adopted is Islamist/Salafi-jihadist, not leftist. The technical skew (engineers, etc.) is better explained by other factors in the literature (cognitive styles, status frustration, recruitment patterns) than by Leftist professors.

In short: Higher education—including some Western technical degrees—is common among certain jihadist elites and plotters, and universities (especially in the West for some operatives) have sometimes served as recruitment or networking environments. The specific causal story blaming “radical Leftist professors and academics” and a radical Left student body as the radicalizing force is not substantiated by the biographical and research record. Radicalization tracks far more closely with Islamist ideological networks and experiences.



They were radicalized at home. Our colleges do not train terrorists. You went to American Universities; when will you attack?
You cannot stop pretending an incident proves the whole. Perhaps living here and eating pizza made them crazy? It could be the air.
Nope, they were goose-stepped through schools and taught terrorism. I guess we can trust nobody who went to college.
 
The fact is .like you guys, the voters know little about Al Sayed. He is an intelligent, well-spoken man. He has good ideas and works well with others. That is what voters will discover. Because you Trumpys do not value those kinds of values, do not bet that the rest of us do not.
 
They were radicalized at home.

Is that so?

Our colleges do not train terrorists.

Is that right?

You went to American Universities;

Who told you that, Nerdsperg?

when will you attack?

When it suits me.

You cannot stop pretending an incident proves the whole.

I don't recall making such a claim.

Perhaps living here and eating pizza made them crazy? It could be the air.

Think so, Nerdsperg?

Nope, they were goose-stepped through schools and taught terrorism.

Didn't you just deny that happens?

Our colleges do not train terrorists.

I guess we can trust nobody who went to college.

Does it? Are you pretending an "incident makes the whole"?
 
Americans are getting to where the Brits are....it does not matter who we vote for....nothing that matters ever changes.

The system crashed.....Constitutional America is over....both parties now work for the Wall Street Mafia....which owns the Swamp.
 
I would add to that, that the very education many of the top people in these Islamic terrorist organizations got was from Western universities where they studied for years under radical Leftist professors and academics while surrounded by a heavily radical Leftist student body that radicalized them.
Did you go to college? I certainly was not told those lies. There was about zero discussion of Muslim religion and philosophy. We did talk about the explosion of knowledge in the Middle East while Europe was under religious control. When religion has power, the people lose science, philosophy, and real education. The church teaches what to think, not how.
The Middle East's intellectual superiority was destroyed when radical Islam gained power. When religion gets control. it costs a nation a couple of centuries of progress.
 
Did you go to college? I certainly was not told those lies. There was about zero discussion of Muslim religion and philosophy. We did talk about the explosion of knowledge in the Middle East while Europe was under religious control. When religion has power, the people lose science, philosophy, and real education. The church teaches what to think, not how.
The Middle East's intellectual superiority was destroyed when radical Islam gained power. When religion gets control. it costs a nation a couple of centuries of progress.
I went before Islamic terrorism became the worldwide threat it is today. However, you are correct. Islam went 'dark' intellectually in the aftermath of the Mongol invasion of the Middle East in the 12th and 13th centuries. It never recovered.
 
Did you go to college? I certainly was not told those lies. There was about zero discussion of Muslim religion and philosophy. We did talk about the explosion of knowledge in the Middle East while Europe was under religious control. When religion has power, the people lose science, philosophy, and real education. The church teaches what to think, not how.
The Middle East's intellectual superiority was destroyed when radical Islam gained power. When religion gets control. it costs a nation a couple of centuries of progress.
Yup.

Many like to speak of the Roman Empire fall being the result of debauchery...which is laughable. When Rome was at its greatest, making contributions to art, sculpture, philosophy, architecture, law, government, legal structure...it was also at its most debauched.

Then came Christianity to curb that debauchery...and bring morality. And the Roman empire, which had endured for hundred of years, was brought to its knees in a relatively short time...and European culture entered a thousand years of bullshit that was so unproductive it became known as the dark ages.
 
Four days after NBC’s own Steve Kornacki highlighted just how toxic socialism remains with independents, Meet the Press suddenly seemed determined to soften the issue.

When Republican Sen. Jim Banks argued that Democrats are moving toward socialism, NBC could have challenged him with facts, asked Democrats to respond, or simply shown its own polling. Instead, it reached into the archives and trotted out John F. Kennedy talking about Democrats as the party of ideas.

Seriously?

JFK died in 1963. He has absolutely nothing to tell us about what the Democratic Party believes in 2026.

The framing was comical: Meet the Press? More like Meet the Propaganda.
 
Poor maga/alt right ... grasping at straws, trying to substitute the opinions of the few for the many ... and all the while the voting results just makes fools and liars of them.

Mid-terms are coming for ya, baby!
 
image1786362363-jpg.91712


Do they consider that a bad thing, though?
 
Back
Top