The guy conceded, Gore did not challenge the results after the Court ruling, he didn’t pull a Trump, he recognized the importance of the peaceful transition of power in a democracy, your Messiah dumped on that precedent
“Lindell alleges voting irregularities, refuses to concede”
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
Gore did what he did and said what he said, Anchovies. So did the rest.
Keep spinning.
Poor Anchovies.
And he is still incorrect:
“Democrat Stacey Abrams on Friday acknowledged that Republican Brian Kemp will become the next governor of Georgia, ending her bid to become the first African American woman elected to lead a state.”
“The announcement followed more than a week of post-election legal maneuvering from her campaign and allies as they sought to find enough votes to reduce Kemp’s lead and force a December 4 runoff.”
“Abrams was considering further legal challenges as recently as Friday morning, but ultimately made the decision to end her campaign in a fiery speech to supporters at her headquarters in Atlanta.”
Now did she formally and loudly utter the words “I concede,” no, but she did acknowledge the results and ending efforts
Correct, he acknowledged the election and ended any efforts to reverse the results, as I said, unlike your Messiah
She specifically stated in her speech that she was not conceding. You'll say anything to pretend you are right, but in this you are not.
I don't recall having a messiah, Anchovies, and Gore still did what he did and said what he said, along with the rest.
That she dd, but she recognized the results and quickly surrendered any effort to delegitimize the election, something Trump has never done
Thanks, that was easy
Going to "walk your dog" again, Anchovies?
Hillary conceded but constantly told folks there were irregularities, regretted it at every turn, and told others never to concede because of "russian interference", etc. Utter nonsense though it was proven to be... but in her mind, it still is a thing. These same people act as if Trump saying the same thing about Ds is somehow undermining democracy, but when they say it, magically it supports democracy...
Of course. Remember; when they talk about democracy, it's OUR Democracy. Meaning theirs.
Tbird19482
Verified User
You need at lease two brain cells to rub together first to learn something and there isn't a MAGA on here that does.
Is that so?
The shocker is that it was a primary election with Reds only voting. Tough to blame that on the Dems. Buit rightys use the same script. You lose, you were cheated,
Are you under the impression that no Democrats work in the Minnesota Secretary of State's office, Nerdsperg?
Do you not know that same-party races can be gamed to ensure that the opposition faces the weaker candidate, Nerdsperg?
Are you saying that Republicans would never cheat in a primary, Nerdsperg?
Now, because I perceive that you are abysmally stupid, Nerdsperg, I'm not saying any of the above scenarios occurred in this instance.
But the possibilities do exist, hypothetically, don't they, Nerdsperg?
First, the “Russian interference”was anything but proven nonsense, Trump’s upper level campaign leaders secretly meeting with Russians in Trump Tower alone shows it was real
And no Democrat Presidential candidate never said or did anything that directly challenged the peaceful transition of power, a pillar of American democracy, only Trump did, which created the legitimate attacks of undermining democracy