In Merry Olde England during the industrial revolution, everyday was "Bring your child to work day." I thought you Marxists loved that sort of thing, Comrade?
Capitalism cannot fail citizens
- Thread starter Truth Detector
- Start date
In Merry Olde England during the industrial revolution, everyday was "Bring your child to work day." I thought you Marxists loved that sort of thing, Comrade?
You didn’t “notice” shit, you just can’t answer the question because you do know the answer will validate my point
Once again, was child labor common during America’s Gilded Age when pure capitalism reigned, yes or no?
Pre industrialization, and if prosperity ended child labor how was it at its height during the Gilded Age?
America isn’t merry ole England, and those kids weren’t there to watch and learn but to work cause tney were cheaper labor meaning greater profit, the goal of capitalism
Is your lie that average GDP was higher in this fictional "gilded age" you Marxists drone on about?
Yet you lie that Oliver Twist happened in rural Montana.
Your bullshit tropes from the Marxist hate sites are based on Europe during the Industrial Revolution.
evince
Truthmatters
And so what dumb fuck
We are discussing capitalism
When did you idiot cult members decide capitalism is better than any government?
evince
Truthmatters
Where is the post of his that says that you fucking cult bag of lies?
Getting really funny, now, because you can’t just accept the truth, your changing the goal posts, moving from child labor occurring during unrestricted capitalism to introducing GDP, as if GDP is somehow relevant.
And labeling the Gilded Age as fictions again just shows MAGA’s ignorance of American History
Oliver Twist was written long before Montana became a State, and there never were factories in what became Montana at the time, duh
As I clearly showed you, and any person with even the least familiarization of American History knows, child labor was common in America in the last half of the 19th Century when capitalism dominated the economy
As said, if you got nothing factual, move on
Dumbass ass commie moves the goal posts by whining " if prosperity ended child labor how was it at its height during the Gilded Age?" then cries because I point out that prosperity is MUCH higher now.
ROFL
It's a Mark Twain novel, sparky. It deals with one of the most corrupt eras in American history - it was not a time of universal wealth.
Your lack of education does you dirty, Comrade.
I didn't have rich parents like tRump, I had to earn mine.
Unbelievable, compares today’s GDP to that of the late 19th Century and concludes the latter wasn’t the height of unrestricted capitalism because today’s GDP is greater, too funny
Not worth explaining economics nor history to him, it would be like teaching a blind person to drive, but if he is erroneously celebrating today keep in mind since the turn of the 20th Century America has added multiple socialistic guardrails that weren’t present in the 19th Century, so wouldn’t they have contributed to today’s success?
Well, he got one thing right characterizing the era as “most corrupt,” corrupt doe to the free ride of pure capitalism, isn’t falsely called the time of “Robber Barons vs Captains of Industry”
You were lying that we were more prosperous, and yet there was child labor (mostly on farms). Ges, GDP is indeed a measure of prosperity. Your ignorance is exceeded only by your dishonesty.
You have zero understanding of economics. You've read neither Keynes nor Friedman, nor anyone else. You listen to talking heads on MSNBC spew idiocy they got from Krugman and imagine you actually know what the fuck you're talking about. You don't. You are virtually illiterate in regard to macroeconomics, and it glares for all to see.
ROFL
Funny, Twain blamed corrupt politicians and Washington.
Say, you advocate for absolute government and having politicians micromanage every aspect of life, doncha?
You really have a problem processing, never said the Gilded Age was more prosperous, rather, that it was the last era of unrestricted capitalism, which is a fact, and because of such, child labor was common
You were lying that we were more prosperous, and yet there was child labor (mostly on farms). Ges, GDP is indeed a measure of prosperity. Your ignorance is exceeded only by your dishonesty.
You have zero understanding of economics. You've read neither Keynes nor Friedman, nor anyone else. You listen to talking heads on MSNBC spew idiocy they got from Krugman and imagine you actually know what the fuck you're talking about. You don't. You are virtually illiterate in regard to macroeconomics, and it glares for all to see.
ROFL
Funny, Twain blamed corrupt politicians and Washington.
Say, you advocate for absolute government and having politicians micromanage every aspect of lif
Did you really think that States and the Federal Government passed all those Child Labor Laws, socialism, to protect kids working on fames
And not that it matters, but MSNBC doesn’t even exist anymore, and I doubt those talking heads pontificate on Child Labor or the Gilded Age
You are still wasting time
Run it through a translator and post in English. Rules state that some few posts can be in another language, not every post.
ROFL
Lying won't help you - it never doesn.
Are you claiming your account was hacked and it wasn't you who posted;
{Pre industrialization, and if prosperity ended child labor how was it at its height during the Gilded Age?) Post 169?
You can't lie your way out of this.
Laws were passed due to social pressure, in the typical capitalistic way free republics do things.
Changing the name to CCPNow in no way changed what MSNBC is. It is still the official propaganda outlet for Communist China.
You can't get out of this by lying. It hasn't worked, and it won't. You've made stupid claims in your zeal to rewrite history in the image of Karl Marx, and you've been rightfully dragged for that stupidity.